Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-tq7bh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T15:10:52.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiocarbon Dates and the Earliest Colonization of East Polynesia: More than a Case Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Philippe Della Casa
Philippe Della Casa*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Pre-/Protohistory, University of Zurich, Karl-Schmid-Str. 4, CH-8006 Zurich. Email: phildc@access.uzh.ch
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Over the last 30 yr, there has been an ongoing debate on the dates and modes of the earliest colonization of East Polynesia, namely the Cook Islands, the 5 archipelagos of French Polynesia, the Hawai'i Islands, Easter Island, and New Zealand. At least 3 alternative models were proposed by Sinoto, Anderson, Kirch, and Conte, but interestingly all these models basically relied on the same set of roughly 200 radiocarbon dates on various organic materials from archaeological excavations as far back as the 1950s. Some of the models differed by 500–1000 yr—for a proposed initial colonization around the turn of the BC/AD eras, if not considerably later. By comparing the different approaches to this chronological issue, it becomes evident that almost all known problems in dealing with 14C dates from archaeological excavations are involved: stratigraphy and exact location of samples, sample material and quality, inbuilt ages and reservoir effects, lab errors in ancient dates, etc. More recently, research into landscape and vegetation history has produced alternative 14C dating for early human impact, adding to the confusion about the initial stages of island colonization, while archaeological 14C dates, becoming increasingly “young” as compared to former investigations, now advocate a rapid and late (post-AD 900) colonization of the archipelagos. As it appears, the Polynesian case is more than just another case study, it's a lesson on 14C-based archaeological chronology. The present paper does not pretend to solve the problems of early Polynesian colonization, but intends to contribute to the debate on how 14C specialists and archaeologists might cooperate in the future.

Information

Type
Radiocarbon Chronologies of the Neolithic and Metal Ages
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , 2009 , pp. 681 - 693
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Allen, M. 2004. Revisiting and revising Marquesan culture history: new archaeological investigations at Anaho Bay, Nuku Hiva Island. Journal of the Polynesian Society 113(2):143–96.Google Scholar
Anderson, A. 1994. Palaeoenvironmental evidence of island colonization: a response. Antiquity 68:845–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, A. 2001. Mobility models of Lapita migration. In: Clark, G, Anderson, A, Vunidilo, T, editors. The Archaeology of Lapita Dispersal in Oceania. Terra Australis 17. Canberra: ANU. p 15–23.Google Scholar
Anderson, A. 2002. Faunal collapse, landscape change and settlement history in Remote Oceania. World Archaeology 33(3):375–90.Google Scholar
Anderson, A. 2006a. Review of B. Finney 2003, Sailing in the Wake of the Ancestors. Asian Perspectives 45(1):126–7.Google Scholar
Anderson, A. 2006b. Polynesian seafaring and American horizons: a response to Jones and Klar. American Antiquity 71(4):759–63.Google Scholar
Anderson, A, Sinoto, Y. 2002. New radiocarbon ages of colonization sites in East Polynesia. Asian Perspectives 41(2):242–57.Google Scholar
Anderson, A, Conte, E, Kirch, PV, Weisler, MI. 2003. Cultural chronology in Mangareva (Gambier islands), French Polynesia: evidence from recent radiocarbon dating. Journal of the Polynesian Society 112(2):119–40.Google Scholar
Avis, C, Montenegro, A, Weaver, A. 2007. The discovery of western Oceania: a new perspective. Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology 2(2):197–209.Google Scholar
Bass, B. 1998. Early Neolithic offshore accounts: remote islands, maritime exploitations, and the trans-Adriatic cultural network. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 11(2):165–90.Google Scholar
Bass, B. 2008. Early Neolithic communities in southern Dalmatia: farming seafarers or seafaring farmers? European Journal of Archaeology 11(2–3):245–65.Google Scholar
Behre, KE. 2007. Evidence for Mesolithic agriculture in and around central Europe? Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 16(2–3):203–19.Google Scholar
Buck, PH. 1938. Vikings of the Sunrise. New York: F.A. Stockes Co.Google Scholar
Burga, C. 1976. Frühe menschliche Spuren in der subalpinen Stufe des Hinterrheins. Geographica Helvetica 2:93–6.Google Scholar
Callaghan, R, Fitzpatrick, SM. 2008. Examining prehistoric migration patterns in the Palauan archipelago: a computer simulated analysis of drift voyaging. Asian Perspectives 47(1):28–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conte, E. 1986. La navigation hauturière: un art disparu. In: La vie quotidienne dans la Polynésie d'autrefois. Encyclopédie de la Polynésie, volume 5. Papeete: Gleizal-multipress.Google Scholar
Conte, E. 1995. Tereraa. Voyage et peuplement des îles du Pacifique. Tahiti: Polymages-Scoop.Google Scholar
Conte, E. 2000. L'archéologie en Polynésie française. Esquisse d'un bilan critique. Tahiti: Aux vent des îles.Google Scholar
Conte, E. 2006. Ethnoarchaeology in Polynesia. In: Lilley, I, editor. Archaeology of Oceania: Australia and the Pacific Islands. Malden: Blackwell. p 240–58.Google Scholar
Coudart, A, Lemonnier, P. 1984. Ethnoarchéologie et ethnologie des techniques. Techniques et Cultures 3:157–69.Google Scholar
Della Casa, P. 2000. Mesolcina praehistorica. Mensch und Naturraum in einem Bündner Südalpental vom Mesolithikum bis in römische Zeit. Universitätsforschungen zur Prähistorischen Archäologie 67. Bonn: Habelt.Google Scholar
Dening, G. 2003. Voyaging the past, present, and future. Historical reenactments on HM Bark Endeavour and the voyaging canoe Hokule'a in the Sea of Islands. In: Nussbaum, FA, editor. The Global Eighteenth Century. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. p 309–24.Google Scholar
Evin, J, Oberlin, C, Daugas, J-P, Salles, J-F, editors. 1999. 14C et Archéologie. Actes du 3ème Congrès International, Lyon 1998. Mémoires de la Société Préhistorique Française 26. Rennes: Université.Google Scholar
Finney, B. 1979a. Voyaging. In: Jennings, JD, editor. The Prehistory of Polynesia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Finney, B. 1979b. Hokule'a: The Way to Tahiti. New York: Dodd Mead.Google Scholar
Finney, B. 2003. Sailing in the Wake of the Ancestors: Reviving Polynesian Voyaging. Honolulu: BP Bishop Museum Press.Google Scholar
Galipaud, J-C. 2006. The first millennium B.C. in remote Oceania: an alternative perspective on Lapita. In: Lilley, I, editor. Archaeology of Oceania: Australia and the Pacific Islands. Malden: Blackwell. p 228–39.Google Scholar
Garanger, J. 1987. Le peuplement de l'Océanie insulaire. L'Anthropologie 91:803–16.Google Scholar
Graves, MW, Addison, DJ. 1995. The Polynesian settlement of the Hawaiian Archipelago: integrating models and methods in archaeological interpretation. World Archaeology 26(3):380–99.Google Scholar
Higham, T, Bronk Ramsey, C, Owen, C, editors. 2004. Radiocarbon and Archaeology. 4th International Symposium, Oxford 2002. Oxford: University School of Archaeology, Monograph 62.Google Scholar
Höpfel, F, Platzer, W, Spidler, K. 1992. Der Mann im Eis 1. Innsbruck: Veröffentlichungen der Universität Innsbruck 187.Google Scholar
Hunt, TL, Lipo, CP. 2006. Evidence for a shorter chronology on Rapa Nui (Easter Island). Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology 3(1):140–8.Google Scholar
Irwin, G. 1992. The Prehistoric Exploration and Colonisation of the Pacific. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, G. 1998. The colonization of the Pacific: chronological, navigational and social issues. Journal of the Polynesian Society 107:111–44.Google Scholar
Irwin, G. 2008. Pacific seascapes, canoe performance, and a review of Lapita voyaging with regard to theories of migration. Asian Perspectives 47(1):12–27.Google Scholar
Jennings, JD, editor. 1979. The Prehistory of Polynesia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, TL, Klar, KA. 2005. Diffusionism reconsidered: linguistic and archaeological evidence for prehistoric Polynesian contact with southern California. American Antiquity 70(3):457–84.Google Scholar
Jones, TL, Klar, KA. 2006. On open minds and missed marks: a response to Atholl Anderson. American Antiquity 71(4):765–70.Google Scholar
Kennett, DJ, Winterhalder, B. 2008. Demographic expansion, despotism and the colonisation of East and South Polynesia. In: Clark, G, Foss Leach, B, O'Connor, S, editors. Islands of Inquiry. Colonisation, Seafaring and the Archaeology of Maritime Landscapes. Terra Australis 29. Canberra: ANU. p 87–96.Google Scholar
Kirch, PV. 1984. The Evolution of the Polynesian Chiefdoms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirch, PV. 1986. Rethinking East Polynesian prehistory. Journal of the Polynesian Society 95:9–40.Google Scholar
Kirch, PV. 2000. On the Road of the Winds. An Archaeological History of the Pacific Islands before European Contact. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kirch, PV, Ellison, J. 1994. Palaeoenvironmental evidence for human colonization of remote Oceanic islands. Antiquity 68(259):310–21.Google Scholar
Kirch, PV, Green, RC. 2001. Hawaiki, Ancestral Polynesia. An Essay in Historical Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirch, PV, Kahn, JG. 2007. Advances in Polynesian prehistory: a review and assessment of the past decade (1993–2004). Journal of Archaeological Research 15(3):191–238.Google Scholar
Kirch, PV, McCoy, MD. 2007. Reconfiguring the Hawaiian cultural sequence: results of re-dating the Halawa dune site (MO-A1-3), Moloka'i island. Journal of the Polynesian Society 116(4):385–406.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 1972. We, the Navigators. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.Google Scholar
Reitmaier, T, Walser, C. 2008. Archäologie an der Grenze—Zum neuen Forschungsprojekt “Rückwege” in der Silvretta. Montfort, Vierteljahresschrift für die Geschichte und Gegenwart Vorarlbergs 60:7–15.Google Scholar
Rolett, BV. 1993. Marquesan prehistory and the origins of East Polynesian culture. Journal de la Société des Océanistes 96:29–47.Google Scholar
Sharp, A. 1956. Ancient Voyagers in the Pacific. Polynesian Society Memoir 32. Wellington.Google Scholar
Sinoto, YH. 1970. An archaeologically based assessment of the Marquesas Islands as a dispersal center in East Polynesia. Pacific Anthropological Records 11:105–32.Google Scholar
Spriggs, M, Anderson, A. 1993. Late colonization of East Polynesia. Antiquity 67(255):200–17.Google Scholar
Thomas, T. 2008. The long pause and the last pulse: mapping East Polynesian colonisation. In: Clark, G, Foss Leach, B, O'Connor, S, editors. Islands of Inquiry. Colonisation, Seafaring and the Archaeology of Maritime Landscapes. Terra Australis 29. Canberra: ANU. p 97–112 Google Scholar
Tinner, W, Nielsen, E, Lotter, AF. 2007. Mesolithic agriculture in Switzerland? A critical review of the evidence. Quaternary Science Review 26(9–10):1416–31.Google Scholar
Wilmshurst, JM, Anderson, AJ, Higham, T, Worthy, T. 2008. Dating the late prehistoric dispersal of Polynesians to New Zealand using the commensal Pacific rat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 105(22):7676–80.Google Scholar