Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-nf276 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T15:22:32.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of emotion regulation and perpetrator-victim roles in intimate partner violence on mental health problems among men who have sex with men in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2020

D. Wei
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, No.74, Zhongshan second road, Guangzhou, China
F. Hou
Affiliation:
Department of Public Mental Health, Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, No. 1080 Cuizhu Road, Luohu District, Shenzhen, Guangdong518020, China Sun Yat-sen Global Health Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
W. Cao
Affiliation:
Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
C. Hao
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, No.74, Zhongshan second road, Guangzhou, China Sun Yat-sen Global Health Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
J. Gu
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, No.74, Zhongshan second road, Guangzhou, China Sun Yat-sen Global Health Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
L. Peng
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, No.74, Zhongshan second road, Guangzhou, China
J. Li*
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, No.74, Zhongshan second road, Guangzhou, China Sun Yat-sen Global Health Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
*
Author for correspondence: Jinghua Li, E-mail: lijinghua3@mail.sysu.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aims

This study assessed the relationships between different perpetrator-victim roles in intimate partner violence (IPV), emotion regulation (ER) and mental health problems among men who have sex with men (MSM) in China.

Methods

From April to June 2019, 1233 participants were approached via gay-friendly non-governmental organisations in 15 cities across mainland China.

Results

Of the total, 578 eligible participants completed an anonymous online survey. All participants provided informed consent and information about their violent perpetrator-victim role and mental health status. The results revealed a high prevalence of IPV in this study sample, with 32.7% of participants reporting IPV victimisation and 32.5% of participants reporting IPV perpetration during their lifetime. A total of 81 (14.0%) participants were suicidal, 309 (53.5%) participants reported poor general mental health and 208 (36.0%) had significant depressive symptoms. Adjusted logistic regression models revealed that both physical victimisation (adjusted odds ratio [ORa] = 3.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11–9.32) and sexual victimisation (ORa = 2.90, 95% CI = 1.39–6.05) had positive associations with suicidality, and unidirectional and bidirectional psychological perpetration were associated with poor general mental health and significant depressive symptoms. Although high cognitive reappraisal showed a negative association with poor general mental health (ORa = 0.89,95% CI = 0.86–0.92), the correlation with victims of IPV was weaker than it was with non-victims.

Conclusions

This study revealed that different perpetrator-victim roles in different IPV situations should be considered comprehensively in research, prevention and intervention. ER is not enough to buffer the effects of IPV on the mental health of MSM victims.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Socio-demographic Characteristics of sample MSM population

Figure 1

Table 2. Descriptive statistics of lifetime IPV experience

Figure 2

Table 3. Adjusted logistic regression analysis of IPV experience and mental health outcomes

Figure 3

Table 4. Correlations of study variables

Figure 4

Table 5. Final model for cognitive reappraisal and any IPV victimisation predicting poor mental health