Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-4jdj6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-11T05:56:07.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observing iconic gestures enhances word learning in typically developing children and children with specific language impairment*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2017

SUSANNE VOGT  and
CHRISTINA KAUSCHKE
SUSANNE VOGT*
Affiliation:
University of Applied Sciences Fresenius, Germany
CHRISTINA KAUSCHKE
Affiliation:
Philipps-University Marburg, Germany
*
Address for correspondence: Susanne Vogt, University of Applied Sciences Fresenius – Health & Social Affairs, Limburger Str. 2, Idstein 65510, Germany. e-mail: vogt@hs-fresenius.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research has shown that observing iconic gestures helps typically developing children (TD) and children with specific language impairment (SLI) learn new words. So far, studies mostly compared word learning with and without gestures. The present study investigated word learning under two gesture conditions in children with and without language impairment. Twenty children with SLI (age four), twenty age-matched TD children, and twenty language-matched TD children were taught words that were presented with either iconic or non-iconic gestures. Results showed that children of all groups benefited more successfully from observing iconic gestures for word learning. The iconic gesture advantage was similar across groups. Thus, observing iconic gestures prompts richer encoding and makes word learning more efficient in TD and language impaired children.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 44 , Issue 6 , November 2017 , pp. 1458 - 1484
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

[*]

This research was supported by a grant from the German professional association of logopaedics (dbl) to the first author. Our gratitude goes to all children, parents, speech and language therapists, and nurseries involved in this study. We thank Professor Katharina Rohlfing for valuable advice and Franziska Hofstetter for research assistance. Our thanks are extended to two anonymous reviewers and the editors for providing very constructive feedback to improve the quality of this paper.

References

REFERENCES

Alt, M., Meyers, C. & Alt, P. M. (2013). Using ratings to gain insight into conceptual development. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 56, 1650–61.Google Scholar
Beattie, G. & Shovelton, H. (2006). When size really matters: how a single semantic feature is represented in the speech and gesture modalities. Gesture 6, 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M. (2014). Ten questions about terminology for children with unexplained language problems. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 49, 381–415.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M. & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Same or different? Psychological Bulletin 130, 858–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botting, N., Riches, N., Gaynour, M. & Morgan, G. (2010). Gesture production and comprehension in children with specific language development. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 28, 51–69.Google Scholar
Capone, N. C. & McGregor, K. K. (2005). The effect of semantic representation on toddlers’ word retrieval. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 48, 1468–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Capone Singleton, N. (2012). Can semantic enrichment lead to naming in a word extension task? American Journal of Speech Language Pathology 21, 279–92.Google Scholar
Conti-Ramsden, G. M. & Botting, N. F. (2004). Characteristics of children with specific lanugage impairment. In Verhoeven, L. & van Balkom, H. (eds), Classification of developmental language disorders (pp. 23–38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ebert, K. D. & Kohnert, K. (2011). Sustained attention in children with primary language impairment: a meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 54, 1372–84.Google Scholar
Eichorn, N., Marton, K., Campanelli, L. & Scheuer, J. (2014). Verbal strategies and nonverbal cues in school-age children with and without specific language impairment (SLI). International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 49, 618–30.Google Scholar
Ellis Weismer, S. & Hesketh, L. H. (1993). The influence of prosodic and gestural cues on novel word acquisition by children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 36, 1013–25.Google Scholar
Engelkamp, J. & Cohen, R. L. (1991). Current issues in memory of action events. Psychological Research 53, 175–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, A. V. (2006). Test for reception of grammar German version – TROG-D. Idstein: Schulz-Kirchner.Google Scholar
Fox, A. V. (2005). Psycholinguistische Analyse kindlicher Sprechstörungen – PLAKSS. Frankfurt/M.: Pearson Assessment.Google Scholar
Frick-Horbury, D. & Guttentag, R. E. (1998). The effects of restricting hand gesture production on lexical retrieval and free recall. American Journal of Psychology 111, 43–62.Google Scholar
Goodrich, W. & Hudson Kam, C. L. (2009). Co-speech gesture as input in verb learning. Developmental Science 12, 81–97.Google Scholar
Gray, S. (2003). Word learning by preschoolers with specific language impairment: What predicts success? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 46, 56–67.Google Scholar
Grimm, H. (2010). Sprachentwicklungstest für drei- bis fünfjährige Kinder – SETK3–5. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Hodges, L., Özçaliṣkan, S. & Williamson, R. (2015). How early do children understand different types of iconicity in gesture? In Proceedings of the 39th Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Horst, J. S., Parsons, K. L. & Bryan, N. M. (2011). Get the story straight: contextual repetition promotes word learning from storybooks. Frontiers in Psychology 2, 1–11.Google Scholar
Horst, J. S. & Samuelson, L. K. (2008). Fast mapping but poor retention by 24-month-old infants. Infancy 13, 128–57.Google Scholar
Hostetter, A. B. (2011). When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 137, 297–315.Google Scholar
Justice, L. M., Meier, J. & Walpole, S. (2005). Learning new words from storybooks: an efficacy study with at-risk kindergartners. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 36, 17–32.Google Scholar
Kastner-Koller, U. & Deimann, P. (2012). Wiener Entwicklungstest – WET. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Kauschke, C. & Siegmüller, J. (2010). Patholinguistische Diagnostik bei Sprachentwicklungsstörungen – PDSS. München: Urban & Fischer Verlag (Elsevier).Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1994). Do gestures communicate? A review. Research on Language and Social Interaction 27, 175–200.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture – visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, E., Pine, K. J. & Ryder, N. (2011). I hear what you say but I see what you mean: the role of gestures in children's pragmatic comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes 26, 149–70.Google Scholar
Krauss, R. M., Chen, Y. & Gottesman, R. F. (2000). Lexical gestures and lexical access: a process model. In McNeill, D. (ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 261–283). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lavelli, M., Barachetti, C. & Florit, E. (2015). Gesture and speech during shared book reading with preschoolers with specific language impairment. Journal of Child Language 42, 1191–218.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. B. (1998). Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. B. (2009). Some reflections on the study of children with specific language impairment. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 25, 169–71.Google Scholar
Lüke, C. & Ritterfeld, U. (2014). The influence of iconic and arbitrary gestures on novel word learning in children with and without SLI. Gesture 14, 203–24.Google Scholar
Madan, C. R. & Singhal, A. (2012). Using actions to enhance memory: effects of enactment, gestures, and exercise on human memory. Frontiers in Psychology 3, 1–4.Google Scholar
Marentette, P. & Nicoladis, E. (2011). Preschoolers’ interpretations of gesture: Label or action associate? Cognition 121, 386–99.Google Scholar
McGregor, K. K., Newman, R. M., Reilly, R. M. & Capone, N. C. (2002). Semantic representation and naming in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 45, 998–1014.Google Scholar
McGregor, K. K., Rohlfing, K. J., Bean, A. & Marschner, E. (2009). Gesture as a support for word learning: the case of under . Journal of Child Language 36, 807–82.Google Scholar
McKean, C., Letts, C. & Howard, D. (2013). Developmental change is key to understanding primary language impairment: the case of phonotactic probability and nonword repetition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 56, 1579–94.Google Scholar
McNeil, N. M., Alibali, M. W. & Evans, J. L. (2000). The role of gesture in children's comprehension of spoken language: now they need it, now they don't. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 24, 131–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: what gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mumford, K. H. & Kita, S. (2014). Children use gesture to interpret novel verb meanings. Child Development 85, 1181–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munro, N., Baker, E., McGregor, K. K., Docking, K. & Arciuli, J. (2011). Iconic gestures support toddlers’ retention of word–referent pairings. In Abstracts for the 12th Congress of the International Association for the Study of Child Language 78–9, 2011, University of Quebec at Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
Namy, L., Campbell, A. L. & Tomasello, M. (2004). The changing role of iconicity in non-verbal symbol learning: a U-shaped trajectory in the acquisition of arbitrary gestures. Journal of Cognition and Development 5, 37–57.Google Scholar
Novack, M. A., Goldin-Meadow, S. & Woodward, A. L. (2015). Learning from gesture: How early does it happen? Cognition 142, 138–47.Google Scholar
Puccini, D. & Liszkowski, U. (2012). 15-month-old infants fast map words but not representational gestures of multimodal labels. Frontiers in Psychology 3, 101.Google Scholar
Raven, J. C., Bulheller, S. & Häcker, H. (2010). Coloured Progressive Matrices – CPM. Frankfurt: Pearson Assessment.Google Scholar
Ruiter, J. P. de (2000). The production of gesture and speech. In McNeill, D. (ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 284–311). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sekine, K., Sowden, H. & Kita, S. (2015). Development of the ability to semantically integrate information in speech and iconic gesture in comprehension. Cognitive Science 39, 1855–80.Google Scholar
Sheng, L. & McGregor, K. K. (2010). Object and action naming in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 53, 1704–19.Google Scholar
So, W. C., Chen-Hui, C. S. & Wei-Shan, J. L. (2012). Mnemonic effect of iconic gesture and beat gesture in adults and children: Is meaning in gesture important for memory recall? Language and Cognitive Processes 27, 665–81.Google Scholar
Stanfield, C., Williamson, R. & Özçaliṣkan, S. (2014). How early do children understand gesture–speech combinations with iconic gestures? Journal of Child Language 41, 462–71.Google Scholar
Tolar, T., Lederberg, A. R., Gokhale, S. & Tomasello, M. (2008). The development of the ability to recognize the meaning of iconic signs. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 13, 225–40.Google Scholar
University of Leipzig (1998–2013). Wortschatzportal (Vocabulary Portal). Online resource: <www.wortschatz.uni-leipzig.de>..>Google Scholar
Yap, D.-F., So, W.-C., Yap, J.-M. M. & Tan, Y.-Q. (2011). Iconic gestures prime words. Cognitive Science 35, 171–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed