Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-z2ts4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T05:19:12.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Guidelines for the recognition and management of mixed depression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Stephen M. Stahl*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, California, USA Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom Neuroscience Education Institute, Carlsbad, California, USA
Debbi A. Morrissette
Affiliation:
Neuroscience Education Institute, Carlsbad, California, USA
Gianni Faedda
Affiliation:
Lucio Bini Mood Disorders Center, New York, New York, USA Centro Lucio Bini, Rome, Italy
Maurizio Fava
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Joseph F. Goldberg
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
Paul E. Keck
Affiliation:
Research Institute at the Lindner Center of HOPE, Mason, Ohio, USA
Yena Lee
Affiliation:
Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Gin Malhi
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Ciro Marangoni
Affiliation:
Centro Lucio Bini, Rome, Italy
Susan L. McElroy
Affiliation:
Research Institute at the Lindner Center of HOPE, Mason, Ohio, USA
Michael Ostacher
Affiliation:
VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
Joshua D. Rosenblat
Affiliation:
Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Eva Solé
Affiliation:
Hospital Clinic, Institute of Neuroscience, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Trisha Suppes
Affiliation:
VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA
Minoru Takeshima
Affiliation:
Psychiatry Clinic, Sainen, Kanazawa City, Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan
Michael E. Thase
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, and the Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Eduard Vieta
Affiliation:
Hospital Clinic, Institute of Neuroscience, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Allan Young
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, Kings College, London, United Kingdom
Mark Zimmerman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
Roger S. McIntyre
Affiliation:
Mood Disorders Psychopharmacology Unit, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
*
*Address correspondence to: Stephen M. Stahl, Department of Psychiatry, University of California–San Diego, Neuroscience Education Institute, 1917 Palomar Oaks Way, Suite 200, Carlsbad, California 92008, USA. (Email: smstahl@neiglobal.com)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A significant minority of people presenting with a major depressive episode (MDE) experience co-occurring subsyndromal hypo/manic symptoms. As this presentation may have important prognostic and treatment implications, the DSM–5 codified a new nosological entity, the “mixed features specifier,” referring to individuals meeting threshold criteria for an MDE and subthreshold symptoms of (hypo)mania or to individuals with syndromal mania and subthreshold depressive symptoms. The mixed features specifier adds to a growing list of monikers that have been put forward to describe phenotypes characterized by the admixture of depressive and hypomanic symptoms (e.g., mixed depression, depression with mixed features, or depressive mixed states [DMX]). Current treatment guidelines, regulatory approvals, as well the current evidentiary base provide insufficient decision support to practitioners who provide care to individuals presenting with an MDE with mixed features. In addition, all existing psychotropic agents evaluated in mixed patients have largely been confined to patient populations meeting the DSM–IV definition of “mixed states” wherein the co-occurrence of threshold-level mania and threshold-level MDE was required. Toward the aim of assisting clinicians providing care to adults with MDE and mixed features, we have assembled a panel of experts on mood disorders to develop these guidelines on the recognition and treatment of mixed depression, based on the few studies that have focused specifically on DMX as well as decades of cumulated clinical experience.

Information

Type
Guidelines
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017
Figure 0

Figure 1 Mood disorders spectrum and DSM–5 diagnosis. Mood disorders can be conceptualized as existing along a spectrum that spans from pure unipolar depression with no intra- or inter-episode symptoms of (hypo)mania all the way to threshold level mania.

Figure 1

Figure 2 The probabilistic approach to differential diagnosis. Numerous factors, including early age at onset of first depressive episode, seasonality, antidepressant-induced (hypo)mania, and impulsivity, while not diagnostic of bipolar depression, are less common in pure unipolar depression compared to bipolar spectrum disorders. Moreover, the presence of psychotic features and extensive family history of psychopathology are additional probabilistic factors for BD. Patterns of comorbidity can also be evaluated as substance-use disorders, and several medical disorders (e.g., migraine and metabolic disturbances) are more common in BD when compared to MDD. Although the presence of any of these probabilistic qualities is not pathognomic, accumulation of these factors should alert clinicians to the possibility that their patient may lie along the bipolar spectrum, either with mixed depression or with bipolar depression.

Figure 2

Figure 3 Bipolar spectrum-based first-line monotherapy treatment recommendations.

Figure 3

Figure 4 Treatment algorithm for major depressive episode without mixed features.

Figure 4

Figure 5 Treatment algorithm for major depressive episode with mixed features (DMX).

Figure 5

Figure 6 Relative tolerability of atypical antipsychotics.

Figure 6

Table 1 Recommendations for acute pharmacological treatment of mixed depression a

Figure 7

Table 2 Dosing recommendations for pharmacotherapy of mixed depression

Figure 8

Table 3 Notable side effects associated with mood stabilizers

Figure 9

Table 4 Longitudinal monitoring according to treatment