Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-vgfm9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T01:22:37.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychological assessment of multi-channel cochlear implant patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

D. Yvonne Aplin
D. Yvonne Aplin*
Affiliation:
(Manchester)
*
Dr D. Y. Aplin, Centre for Audioligy, Education of the Deaf and Speed Patthology, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The psychological effects of profound or total acquired deafness can impair cognitive and interpersonal functioning. A cochlear implant has important psychological implications for individuals and usually has a major impact on the lives of implantees and their families. Psychological assessment and monitoring has formed an integral part of the multi-channel cochlear implant programme at Manchester and contributes to team decisions made about the suitability of patients for implant and subsequent progress of implantees. In this paper the major reasons for carrying out psychological assessment on prospective implantees and for monitoring psychological status of implantees are discussed. The main assessment techniques used at Manchester are described. Group findings from the initial assessments of the first 30 cochlear implant patients (including three deaf-blind subjects) are reported.

Keywords

Cochlear implantPsychological tests

Information

Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 107 , Issue 4 , April 1993 , pp. 298 - 304
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

American Speech and Hearing Association (1986) Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Cochlear Implants. ASHA, 29–49.Google Scholar
Aplin, D. Y., Kane, J. M. (1985) Variables affecting pure tone and speech audiometry in experimentally simulated hearing loss. British Journal of Audiology 19: 219–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aplin, D. Y., Rowson, V. J. (1990) Psychological characteristics of children with functional hearing loss. British Journal of Audiology 24: 77–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A. (1987) Beck Depression Inventory Manual. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. New York.Google Scholar
Bedford, A., Foulds, G. A. (1978) The Personal Distress Inventory and Scales. NFER, Windsor.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M. (1982) Test for Reception of Grammar (TROG). MRC, London.Google Scholar
Boyd, P. J., Vidler, M, Hickson, F. S., Aplin, D. Y, Hesketh, A., Ramsden, R. T., Das, V. K. (1990) Rehabilitation of deaf-blind patients using a multichannel cochlear implant. Paper presented at the Second International Cochlear Implant Symposium. Iowa. USA.Google Scholar
Brimer, M. A., Dunn, L. M. (1973) Full Range English Picture Vocabulary Test Manual. Educational Evaluation Enterprises, Newnham, Glos.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B., Eber, H. W., Tatsuoka, M. M. (1970) Handbook for the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16 PF). Champaign, 11: IPAT.Google Scholar
Clark, G. M, O'Loughlin, B. J., Rickards, F. W., Tong, Y. C. Williams, A. J. (1977) The clinical assessment of cochlear implant patients. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 91:(8), 697–708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, G. M., O'Loughlin, B. J., Rickards, F. W., Tong, Y. C, Williams, A. J. (1987) The University of Melbourne Nucleus Multi-Electrode Cochlear Implant. In Pfaltz C. R. (Series Ed.) Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, vol. 38. Karger, Basel.Google Scholar
Conrad, R. (1979) The DeafSchoolchild. Harper and Row. London.Google Scholar
Crary, W. G., Berliner, K. I., Wexler, M., Miller, L. W. (1982) Psychometric studies and clinical interviews with cochlear implant patients. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, (Supp) 91: 55–58.Google ScholarPubMed
Dinner, M. B., Ackley, R. S., Lubinski, D. J., Balkany, T. J., Reeder, P., Genert, L. (1989) Cochlear implants in the workplace: A nationwide survey. Journal of Rehabilitation of the Deaf 22: 3.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C, Pintilliei, D. (1982) British Picture Vocabulary Scale Manual. NFER-Nelson, Windsor.Google Scholar
Elliott, C. D. (1983) British Ability Scales Manual. NFER-Nelson, Windsor.Google Scholar
Epstein, J. (1989) The Story of the Bionic Ear. Hyland House, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., Eysenck, S. B. G. (1963) Eysenck Personality Inventory Manual. Hodder and Stoughton, Sevenoaks.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975) Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Manual. Hodder and Stoughton, Sevenoaks.Google Scholar
Hallam, R. S. (1976) The Eysenck personality scales: stability and change after therapy. Behaviour Research and Therapy 14: 369–372.Google Scholar
Ingham, J. G. (1966) Changes in MPI scores in neurotic patients: a three year follow-up. British Journal of Psychiatry 112: 931–939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, G. A. (1955) The Psychology of Personal Constructs: A Theory of Personality. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
Knutson, J. E, Hinrichs, J. V., Tyler, R. S., Gantz, B. J., Schartz, H. A., Woodworth, G. (1991) Psychological predictors of audiological outcomes of multichannel cochlear implants: preliminary findings. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 100: 817–822.Google Scholar
McKenna, L. (1986) The psychological assessment of cochlear implant patients. British Journal of Audiology 20: 29–34.Google Scholar
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957) The Measurement of Meaning. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
Stephenson, W. (1953) The Study of Behaviour. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. J. (1984) Acquired Hearing Loss. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Thomas, A., Gilhome Herbst, K. (1980) Social and psychological implications of acquired deafness for adults of employment age. British Journal ofAudiology 14: 76–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, R. S., Kelsay, D. K. (1990) Advantages and disadvantages reported by some of the better cochlear implant patients. American Journal of Otology 11: 4Google ScholarPubMed
Vernon, M., Andrews, J. F. (1990) The Psychology of Deafness. Longman, New York.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1974) Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised Manual. Psychological Corporation, New York.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1986) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised, Manual. Psychological Corporation, New York.Google Scholar
Wexler, M., Berliner, K. I., Miller, L. W., Crary, W. G. (1982) Psychological effects of cochlear implant: patient and ‘index rela-tive’ perceptions. AnnalsofOtology, Rhinology and Laryngology, (Supp) 91: 59–61.Google Scholar