Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-8wtlm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-15T19:32:46.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Erratum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information

Type
Erratum
Information
European Journal of Political Research , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , June 2006 , pp. 722
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2006 European Consortium for Political Research

Erratum. European Journal of Political Research 45: 2, 285‐316. Online publication date: 6‐Apr‐2006.

In Table 1 (page 292) and Table 3 (page 305) of the March 2005 issue of this journal, the following errors occurred. In the left‐hand column of the tables, the second occurrence of the words ‘Procedural fairness’ should have been replaced by ‘Public justification’.

The corrected tables are printed below.

Table 1. Components and definition of key concepts employed in the analysis

Table 3. Determinants of willingness to accept the decision outcome

Notes: Dependent variable: Decision acceptance (wave 2). Standard error given in parentheses.

* p < 0.10, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.

[European Journal of Political Research 45: 285‐315, 2006.]

Figure 0

Table 1. Components and definition of key concepts employed in the analysis

Figure 1

Table 3. Determinants of willingness to accept the decision outcome