Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-kn6lq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-18T02:37:24.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors contributing to delayed diagnosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Jern-Lin Leong ,
Kam-Weng Fong  and
Wong-Kein Low
Jern-Lin Leong
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
Kam-Weng Fong
Affiliation:
Department of Therapeutic Radiology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore
Wong-Kein Low*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Wong-Kein Low, Head of Department and Consultant, Department of Otolaryngology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore(169608). Fax: (65) 226-2079
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) can be difficult to diagnose. Not only is the post-nasal space (PNS) inaccessible to examination, it is frequently occupied by normal lympho-epithelium which can make differentiation from NPC difficult. Together with its frequent atypical presentation, it is not surprising that the diagnosis is missed or delayed. This is undesirable as the treatment of early NPC carries an excellent prognosis. The aim of this study is to ascertain the extent of the problem of missed or delayed diagnosis and to study the factors responsible.

This was a retrospective study of all newly diagnosed patients with NPC from the Singapore General Hospital and treated in the Department of Therapeutic Radiology in the year 1996 (1 January-31 December).

A total of 126 patients were studied. Eighteen patients (14.3 per cent) were found to have delayed diagnosis of more than a month. The delay ranged from 1.2 to 25 months (mean 7.2 months). Factors identified which contributed to delayed diagnosis included i) Clinicians not considering a diagnosis of NPC ii) Clinicians suspecting NPC but misled by the results of investigations iii) Patients refusing investigation or defaulting follow-up.

Nearly a fifth of patients with NPC had delayed diagnosis. Many of the factors responsible for the delays appear to be preventable by better patient education and counselling, doctors having sharper clinical acument and skills in NPC diagnosis and the hospital administration having a system of tracking down high risk patients who default.

Keywords

Nasopharyngeal neoplasmsCarcinomaDiagnosis

Information

Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 113 , Issue 7 , July 1999 , pp. 633 - 636
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Presented at the 32nd Singapore-Malaysia Congress of Medicine, Singapore, 13–16 August 1998.

References

Chan, S. H. (1997) Serology. In Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. 2nd Edition. (Chong, V. F. H., Tsao, S. Y., eds.) Armour Publishing Ltd., Singapore, pp 24–28.Google Scholar
Chew, C. T. (1990) Early diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 19: 270–274.Google Scholar
Chia, K. S., Lee, H. P., Seow, A., Shanmugaratnam, K. (1996) Nasopharynx. In Trends in Cancer Incidence in Singapore 1969–92. 4th Edition. Singapore Cancer Registry, Singapore, pp 70–71.Google Scholar
Kaur, A., Chew, C. T., Lim-Tam, S. K. (1993) Fine needle aspiration of 123 head and neck masses – An initial experience. Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore 22: 303–306.Google ScholarPubMed
Liu, M. Y., Chang, Y. L., Ma, J. (1997) Evaluation of multiple antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus as markers for detecting patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Journal of Medical Virology 52: 262–269.Google Scholar
Low, W. K. (1997) The contact bleeding sign of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Head and Neck 19: 617–619.Google Scholar
Neel, H. B. III., Taylor, W. F. (1983) Clinical presentation and diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: current status. In Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma – Current Concepts. Prasad, U., ed.) University Malay Press, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp 1–10.Google Scholar
Sham, J. S. T., Wei, W. I., Kwan, K. H., Chan, C. W., Choi, P. H. K., Choy, D. (1989) Fibre-optic endoscopic examination and biopsy in determining the extent of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 64: 1838–1842.Google Scholar
Skinner, D. W., Van Hasselt, C. A. (1991) Symptomatology. In Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (Van Hasselt, C. A., Gibb, A. G., eds.) 1st Edition. Chinese University Press, Hong Kong, pp 85–91.Google ScholarPubMed
Van Hasselt, C. A., Skinner, D. W. (1990) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An analysis of 100 Chinese patients. South African Journal of Surgery 28(3): 92–94.Google ScholarPubMed
Waldron, J., Van Hasselt, C. A., Wong, K. Y. (1992) Sensitivity of biopsy using local anaesthesia in detecting nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Head and Neck Surgery 14: 24–27.Google Scholar
Woo, J. K. S., Waldron, J. (1991) Diagnosis. In Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (Van Hasselt, C. A., Gibb, A. G., eds.) 1st Edition. Chinese University Press, Hong Kong, pp 93–104.Google Scholar