Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-7262s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-16T02:45:28.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Crystallographic preferred orientation (CPO) patterns in uniaxially compressed deuterated ice: quantitative analysis of historical data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2022

Nicholas J. R. Hunter*
Affiliation:
School of Earth, Atmosphere and Environment, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
Christopher J. L. Wilson
Affiliation:
School of Earth, Atmosphere and Environment, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
Vladimir Luzin
Affiliation:
Australian Centre for Neutron Scattering, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Lucas Heights, NSW 2234, Australia School of Engineering, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: Nicholas J. R. Hunter, E-mail: nicholas.hunter@monash.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Strain, temperature and strain rate are crucial factors governing the development of crystallographic preferred orientations (CPO) in ice. To better understand how CPO patterns change in response to these variables, we performed quantitative analyses on neutron diffraction data between 2010 and 2019, collected in situ during uniaxial compression experiments on deuterium ice. At strains >10% and temperatures <−10°C, the c-axis pattern switches from a single maximum (‘cluster’) to small circle (‘cone’), both oriented parallel to shortening. The diameter and mean width of the cone pattern decrease as strain and/or strain rate increases. Prismatic axis (a and m) patterns are characterised by great circles parallel to the pole figure margin and may be distinguishable from the patterns in ice deformed under simple shear. While strain has the main influence on the degree of preferred orientation (or CPO ‘strength’), both temperature and strain rate have minor influences, which limits the extent to which CPOs can be used to measure strain. As cluster patterns can be observed in the c-axes of ice deformed under both pure and simple shear settings, this may complicate interpretations of flow geometry in terrestrial ice unless the prismatic axis patterns are also considered.

Information

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Common CPO patterns in ice. (a) Empirical CPO observations from ice cores (001 axis only). Modified from Faria and others (2014). (b) Synthesis of common CPO patterns from both natural and experimental studies (refer text for references).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a) Experimental set-up for combined axial compression deformation and in situ CPO acquisition using neutron diffraction. (b) Orientation of D2O samples during deformation experiments. Red arrows signify the shortening axis.

Figure 2

Table 1. Quantitative summary of deformed ice sample characteristics

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Characteristic c-axis CPO patterns for various strains and strain rates. The shortening axis is parallel to the pole figure centre. At zero and low strains, a random distribution characterises the sample. With increased strain, the pattern changes from a weak cluster to a well-defined small circle parallel with the shortening axis, or ‘cone’. Point plots were constructed using random orientations (n = 10 000) from the ODF.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. (a) Mean intensity spectra of samples along the or E–W (X) plane of the pole figure (refer blue arrow in the inset), categorised as a function of strain. With increasing strain, the samples transition from a weak but dominant single peak at 90° (cluster), towards two well-defined peaks at 60° and 120° (cone). (b) Mean intensity spectra of samples, following the same rationale as in (a) but categorised as a function of temperature. (c) CtC ratio compared with the CPO intensity (J-index).

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Characteristic prismatic (110) and (100), or ‘a’ and ‘m’, patterns in ice samples, plotted using mean intensity spectra. The blue arrows in pole figure insets represent the directions from which intensity data were taken. (a) Mean intensity spectra for (110) and (100) collected E–W of the pole figure. In both pole figures, the mean intensity spectra for cone samples (blue lines) exhibit two peaks close 0° and 180°, characteristic of a great circle at the pole figure margin. Mean intensity spectra for cluster sample are flat, due to their weakness of the overall CPO. (b) Mean intensity spectra for (110) and (100) collected around the maximum in each pole figure (about the sample's Z-axis, as defined in Fig. 2b). In most cases, the mean intensity spectrum is flat, indicating no distinct anisotropies.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Relationships between CPO intensity (measured by J-index) and changes in (a) strain (temperature: −7°C), and (b) temperature (strain: 20%). (c) Sensitivity of J-index to strain, based on slopes in (a). Two strain rates (fast: blue line; medium: red line) are presented for comparison.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Influence of increased strain, strain rate and temperature on (a) girdle width and (b) cone width. Strain data are from experiments at −7°C. Temperature data are from experiments at 20% strain. Refer insets for visual definitions of girdle and cone widths.

Supplementary material: File

Hunter et al. supplementary material

Hunter et al. supplementary material

Download Hunter et al. supplementary material(File)
File 468.6 KB