Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-l8wb7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-08T02:32:10.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Advances and perspectives on water imbibition behaviours in shales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2026

Xu Yang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory for Mechanics in Fluid Solid Coupling Systems, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China School of Engineering Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Weijun Shen*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory for Mechanics in Fluid Solid Coupling Systems, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China School of Engineering Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Xinyi Wang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory for Mechanics in Fluid Solid Coupling Systems, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China School of Engineering Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Ning Li
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory for Mechanics in Fluid Solid Coupling Systems, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China School of Engineering Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Hongchuan Chen
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory for Mechanics in Fluid Solid Coupling Systems, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China School of Engineering Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
*
Corresponding author: Weijun Shen; Email: wjshen763@imech.ac.cn

Abstract

Content of image described in text.

The characteristically low flowback recovery in shale reservoirs stems from spontaneous imbibition, a governing mechanism for fluid retention and hydrocarbon production. Despite extensive research, the fundamental processes underlying aqueous-phase transport in shales remain poorly understood. This review synthesises recent findings by characterising imbibition as a dynamic, cross-scale transport phenomenon driven by the coupling of capillary suction, chemical potential gradients and clay hydration. Unlike traditional static descriptions of this process, this review highlight how imbibition induces continuous pore-network evolution via hydration-triggered microfracture propagation and mineral-scale blockage. Geological attributes, fluid chemistry and operational parameters are systematically evaluated. We further examine the methodological transition from macroscopic monitoring to in situ visualisation, and from classical analytical solutions to multiphysics numerical frameworks. Lastly, we conclude by identifying critical knowledge gaps and outlining future perspectives in high-pressure high-temperature in situ measurements, multiscale predictive correlations and intelligent fluid systems.

Information

Type
Critical Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Figure 1 long description.Schematic of a mixed-wettability capillary model for shale pores. The model illustrates the coexistence of water-wet (hw$h_{w}$) and oil-wet (ho$h_{o}$) domains within a pore of diameter D and length L. The left-hand panel shows the longitudinal distribution of water and oil with respective contact angles θw$\theta _{w}$ and θo$\theta _{o}$. The right-hand panel defines the wettability fraction fw$f_{w}$, representing the surface heterogeneity that governs the thermodynamic driving force for spontaneous water imbibition (adapted from Pu et al. (2025)).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Figure 2 long description.Representative geometric configurations of capillaries for modelling pore-scale imbibition. The schematic summarises various non-circular and irregular geometries, including angular (triangular, square, rectangular) and axially varying (sinusoidal, convergent–divergent, curved) capillaries. These models are used to characterise the shape factors and corner-flow effects that occur in complex shale pore networks, providing more realistic descriptions than idealised cylindrical tubes (adapted from Cai et al. (2022)).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Figure 3 long description.High-magnitude capillary pressure curves in shale as a function of water saturation. The plots illustrate the relationship between capillary pressure and water saturation at temperatures of 30 and 50 °C. In the low-saturation regime, capillary pressure reaches several hundred MPa, highlighting the immense resistance to fluid flowback within nanoporous shale matrices. These high pressures contribute to the significant retention of fracturing fluids observed in reservoir scales (adapted from Shen et al. (2019a)).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Figure 4 long description.Microscopic mechanisms of the electric double layer and its impact on clay–water interactions in shales. (a) Schematic of the electric potential (ψ$\psi$) distribution near a negatively charged clay surface. The model identifies the compact Stern layer and the diffusive layer, where the potential decays from the surface value (ψ0$\psi _{0}$) towards the bulk solution. (b) Conceptual illustration of clay swelling and dispersion processes. The hydration of clay particles leads to interlayer expansion and subsequent particle separation beyond the slipping plane. In confined nanopores, the overlap of these diffusive layers creates an electrostatic barrier that facilitates ionic sieving and semipermeable membrane behaviour (adapted from Ding et al. (2021) and Wang et al. (2025)).

Figure 4

Figure 5. Figure 5 long description.Schematic of osmotically driven water imbibition in the shale matrix. Low-salinity fracturing fluid interacts with high-salinity formation water . Clay minerals, interspersed among inorganic grains, function as semipermeable membranes. The resulting salinity gradient induces osmotic flux from the fracture into matrix pores. This process complements capillary forces, particularly in clay-rich formations with significant salinity contrasts (adapted from Su et al. (2022)).

Figure 5

Figure 6. Figure 6 long description.Two-dimensional cross-sections and three-dimensional CT reconstructions of shale samples illustrating structural modifications during clay hydration. In the two-dimensional slices of samples, labels A–D denote the expansion of fracture width, while E highlights the formation of new microfractures. The three-dimensional visualisations show the transition from the initial state to the hydrated state, reflecting the enhancement of fracture interconnectivity. The diameter of the circular field of view is 2.55 cm, providing a spatial scale for the observed fracture density.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Figure 7 long description.Schematic illustration of the multistage kinetic mechanisms involved in clay mineral hydration. (A) The non-hydrated state of clay platelets showing the distribution of exchangeable sodium cations. (B) The surface hydration stage, where water molecules adsorb onto hydrophilic sites and form hydration shells around cations, typically resulting in a discrete interlayer expansion. (C) The osmotic hydration stage, characterised by further water influx driven by concentration gradients, leading to more extensive swelling and structural reconfiguration of the clay matrix. These sequential stages collectively govern the hydration kinetics and the resulting modifications to shale transport pathways (adapted from Wysocki et al. (2018)).

Figure 7

Figure 8. Figure 8 long description.Water vapour adsorption–desorption isotherms for shale samples. The plots illustrate the relationship between water content and relative humidity. The significant hysteresis loops demonstrate that the depletion of condensed water from micropores is more difficult than from larger pores, reflecting strong chemical interactions between water molecules and the shale surface (adapted from Ma et al. (2020a)).

Figure 8

Figure 9. Figure 9 long description.Temporal evolution of NMR T2 spectra during spontaneous water imbibition in shale samples. The transverse relaxation time (T2) serves as a proxy for pore size, where shorter times correspond to smaller pores. As indicated by the red dashed arrow, the signal amplitude increases as imbibition time progresses from 1 to 79 min. The initial growth of the peak at T2 < 1 ms demonstrates that smaller pores are preferentially filled due to higher capillary suction, followed by the gradual invasion of water into larger pore spaces. Each curve represents a specific measurement time as detailed in the legend (adapted from Meng et al. (2015)).

Figure 9

Figure 10. Figure 10 long description.Correlations between shale imbibition characteristics and total clay content. (a) Normalised imbibition capacity, defined as the ratio of average imbibed volume to nominal pore volume, as a function of clay concentration. The dashed line indicates a positive trend where imbibed volumes often exceed measured porosity in clay-rich samples. (b) Driving force coefficient versus total clay content, characterising the acceleration of imbibition rates in the presence of hydrophilic clay minerals. Different symbols (S, N, L, H, LM, LY, UY) represent various shale samples with distinct mineralogical compositions (adapted from Ge et al. (2015)).

Figure 10

Figure 11. Figure 11 long description.Contribution of capillary force and osmotic pressure to the total imbibition driving force across different NaCl concentrations. As salinity increases from 0 wt% (deionised water) to 15 wt%, the total driving force decreases from 51 to 45 MPa. This suppression is primarily driven by the reduction in the osmotic component as the salinity contrast between the fracturing fluid and formation water diminishes. Note that hatching patterns are provided to ensure the data are distinguishable in greyscale or for colour-blind readers (adapted from Ding et al. (2022)).

Figure 11

Figure 12. Figure 12 long description.Temporal evolution of spontaneous imbibition rates in Longmaxi shale under varying pressure conditions. The plot compares the imbibition kinetics at 0.1, 5 and 10 MPa. Higher environmental pressures significantly accelerate the initial imbibition rate, although all samples exhibit a characteristic power-law decay over time.

Figure 12

Figure 13. Figure 13 long description.Experimental workflow for spontaneous imbibition testing combined with LF-NMR monitoring in shale samples (adapted from Qian et al. (2021)). The shale sample is first dried, then exposed to the imbibing brine/salt solution, weighed after imbibition and finally analysed by LF-NMR to characterise water distribution and pore-filling behaviour.

Figure 13

Table 1. Cross-method comparison of representative techniques used in shale imbibition studies.

Figure 14

Figure 14. Figure 14 long description.Conceptual model of wetting-phase imbibition in a tortuous capillary with variable cross-sectional geometry (adapted from Tan et al. (2025)). The capillary is discretised into sections with variable cross-sectional geometry. Pore A and pore B denote enlarged pore bodies, while sections 1 to n represent constricted or variable-width segments. The advancing interface separates the wetting phase from the non-wetting phase.

Figure 15

Figure 15. Figure 15 long description.Schematic illustration of the multiphysics driving forces involved in core-scale forced imbibition (adapted from Li et al. (2022)).