Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-shngb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T15:18:45.853Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Viroporins: discovery, methods of study, and mechanisms of host-membrane permeabilization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2025

Antonio Alcaraz
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Department of Physics, University Jaume I, Castellón, Spain
José L. Nieva*
Affiliation:
Instituto Biofisika (CSIC-UPV/EHU), University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Bilbao, Spain Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Bilbao, Spain
*
Corresponding author: José L. Nieva; Email: joseluis.nieva@ehu.eus
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ‘Viroporin’ family comprises a number of mostly small-sized, integral membrane proteins encoded by animal and plant viruses. Despite their sequence and structural diversity, viroporins share a common functional trend: their capacity to assemble transmembrane channels during the replication cycle of the virus. Their selectivity spectrum ranges from low-pH-activated, unidirectional proton transporters, to size-limited permeating pores allowing passive diffusion of metabolites. Through mechanisms not fully understood, expression of viroporins facilitates virion assembly/release from infected cells, and subverts the cell physiology, contributing to cytopathogenicity. Compounds that interact with viroporins and interfere with their membrane-permeabilizing activity in vitro, are known to inhibit virus production. Moreover, viroporin-defective viruses comprise a source of live attenuated vaccines that prevent infection by notorious human and livestock pathogens. This review dives into the origin and evolution of the viroporin concept, summarizes some of the methodologies used to characterize the structure–function relationships of these important virulence factors, and attempts to classify them on biophysical grounds attending to their mechanisms of ion/solute transport across membranes.

Information

Type
Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Viroporin classification. (a) Classes I and II comprise most known examples of conventional viroporins, and categorize them according to the number of transmembrane domains (TMDs). They are further divided into subclasses A and B considering the topology adopted in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane after synthesis (N-terminus facing the lumen or cytosolic side of the ER, respectively). These two classes may represent a subfamily within the larger group of integral membrane miniproteins of viral origin (DiMaio, 2014; Opella, 2015). (b) Examples of larger viroporins adopting more complex folds in membranes. Note that potential viroporins containing three TMDs were previously proposed to compose class III (Nieva et al., 2012). (c) At least a case of viroporin that includes two pore-forming domains has been reported in the literature (Gladue et al., 2018a). CoV, coronavirus; FMDV, foot-and-mouth disease virus; HRSV, human respiratory syncytial virus; IAV, influenza A virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; NoV, norovirus; PV, poliovirus.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Electrophysiology and complementary approaches to study viroporin activity in vitro. (a) CSFV p7 ion channel activity in endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-like planar bilayers. Representative traces with current recordings without any protein addition (control) and after the addition of p7 protein show the different magnitudes of current jumps seen in experiments. Histogram of the current jump amplitude fitted to two Gaussian peaks. Current was recorded in 150 mM KCl, pH 5.0 at a potential of −50 mV. Reprinted with permission from Largo et al. (2016). (b) Representative current recordings of SARS-CoV2 E in ERGIC-mimetic lipid bilayers at 100 mM CaCl2 show channel opening events with variable durations and conductance. Histogram of conductance jumps at +100 mV. Solid line indicates Gaussian fitting of the histogram. Reprinted with permission from Dregni et al. (2023). (c) Comparison between vesicle leakage and channel formation induced by CSFV p7. Left: Percentage of planar bilayers displaying IC activity (light gray) is compared to the leakage percentage induced by CSFV-p7 addition to LUV (protein-to-lipid ratio, 1:250) (dark gray). Right: Representative conductance recordings for the same conditions. Reprinted with permission from Largo et al. (2016). (d) Atomic force microscopic images in ER-like lipid bilayers at pH 7.4 in control conditions (left) and in the presence of CSFV p7 at pH 7.4 (center) and pH 5.0 (right). CFSV p7:lipid ratio was 1:800. The color bar indicates the height in the z dimension, being white the highest and black the lowest area. Reprinted with permission from Largo et al. (2021).

Figure 2

Table 1. Viroporins purporting transport properties of conventional ion channels: relevant examples

Figure 3

Table 2. Viroporins displaying features of nonconventional ion channels and pores: relevant examples

Figure 4

Figure 3. Structural features of IAV M2 and SARS-CoV2 E viroporins. (a) Structure of the proton-selective IAV M2. Left: tetrameric bundle structure solved by solid-state NMR spectroscopy in a lipid bilayer (PDB ID: 2L0J). Each monomer includes the transmembrane pore-forming domain (residues 22–46) and an interfacial amphipathic helix (residues 48–58); Right: internal anatomy of the pore-forming domain based on a crystal structure obtained with a resolution of 1.65 Å at the ‘intermediate’ pH 6.5 (PDB ID: 3LBW). Positions of the side-chain layers and water clusters are indicated. (b) Structures of the pore-forming transmembrane domain from SARS-CoV2 E solved by solid-state NMR spectroscopy in ERGIC-like bilayers. Top: a ‘closed’ state is favored at high pH and low Ca2+ concentration (PDB ID: 7K3G). Bottom: ‘open’ state adopted at low pH and high Ca2+ concentration (PDB ID: 8SUZ). Side chains of Leu18 are depicted to illustrate aperture of the pore. Side chains of Phe20, Phe23, and Phe26 undergo conformational changes coupled to the transition. Structure models rendered with Chimera (Pettersen et al., 2004).

Figure 5

Figure 4. Mechanisms of membrane permeabilization by viroporins. Class IA IAV M2 exemplifies the case of a conventional channel, operated by the pH gradient and selective for protons. The structure of the conducting pore is stabilized through interactions of the helix bundle with the surrounding membrane lipids (model based on structure with PDB ID: 2L0J). Class IIB PV 2B, or more generally the 2B protein of enteroviruses, portraits features of a conventional channel that conducts Ca2+, but also behaves as a pore allowing free diffusion of solutes below approximately 1,000 Da, whose aperture seems to depend on anionic phospholipids bearing long, unsaturated acyl chains. 3D structure of PV 2B hairpin transmembrane domain derived from Alpha-Fold (Senior et al., 2020). The more complex pore-forming domain of NoV NS3 assemble pores in the outer mitochondrial membrane that allow leakage of Cytochrome c to the cytosol (monomers based on the PDB ID: 4BTF structure). In analogy with the mitochondrial apoptosis-induced channel, the model proposes the release of the protein (depicted in magenta) through toroidal proteolipidic megapores that depend on cardiolipin (Vandenabeele et al., 2023).