Book contents
- Teaching Psychiatry to Undergraduates
- Teaching Psychiatry to Undergraduates
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Section 1 Principles of Medical Education
- Section 2 The Undergraduate Psychiatry Curriculum: Planning and Delivery
- Section 3 Clinical Placements in Psychiatry
- Section 4 Formal Teaching
- Section 5 Materials Development
- Chapter 5.1 Online Learning
- Chapter 5.2 The Flipped Classroom
- Chapter 5.3 Use of Technology and Social Media
- Section 6 Gathering feedback and quality improvement
- Section 7 Student Welfare
- Section 8 Developing as a medical educator
- Index
- References
Chapter 5.1 - Online Learning
from Section 5 - Materials Development
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 October 2022
Book contents
- Teaching Psychiatry to Undergraduates
- Teaching Psychiatry to Undergraduates
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Section 1 Principles of Medical Education
- Section 2 The Undergraduate Psychiatry Curriculum: Planning and Delivery
- Section 3 Clinical Placements in Psychiatry
- Section 4 Formal Teaching
- Section 5 Materials Development
- Chapter 5.1 Online Learning
- Chapter 5.2 The Flipped Classroom
- Chapter 5.3 Use of Technology and Social Media
- Section 6 Gathering feedback and quality improvement
- Section 7 Student Welfare
- Section 8 Developing as a medical educator
- Index
- References
Summary
The development of the internet and growth in technologies has led to the surgency of online learning, including in the field of psychiatry teaching. Online learning provides student with greater flexibility in their learning, particularly for those engaged in postgraduate training, Effective online leaning provision requires planning, time, resources and support. Various approaches can be taken to deliver psychiatry teaching, such as the use of pre-recorded videos of content provision and virtual patient simulations. However, a key element of online learning is communication and collaboration both within the cohort and with the teacher. Teacher presence and input is vital to ensure a quality learning experience. Discussions of cases can also be successfully supported online along with branched decision-making. Communication skills can also be developed online and then augmented with face to face sessions. Blended learning has been successfully implemented in psychiatry teaching, particularly in terms of the flipped classroom approach. Online, blended and hybrid learning are areas of education that have grown in recent years and these approaches can be beneficial in psychiatry teaching.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Teaching Psychiatry to Undergraduates , pp. 122 - 129Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Alexander, S. and Boud, D. (2001). Learners still learn from experience when online. In Stephenson, J (ed.) Teaching and Learning Online: Pedagogies for New Technologies, pp. 3–15. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Bates, A. W. (2005). Technology, E-learning and Distance Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beldarrain, Y. (2012). Distance education trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education, 27 (2): 139–53.Google Scholar
Bell, D. S., Fanarow, G. C. and Hays, R. D. (2000). Self-study from web-based and printed guided materials. A randomised, controlled trial among resident physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine, 132, 938–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, S., Robbins, L. I., Kung, S. (2006). Online resources for assessment and evaluation. Academic Psychiatry, 30, 498–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carr, S. (2000). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. Chronicle of Higher Education, 46 (n.d): A39–A41.Google Scholar
Childress, M. D. and Braswell, R. (2006). Using massively multiplayer online role-playing games for online learning. Distance Education, 27 (2): 187–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruess, R. L., Cruess, S. R., and Steinert, Y. (2018). Medicine and a community of practice: Implications for medical education. Academic Medicine, 93 (2): 185–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, S. (2006). A study of the relationship between student communication interaction and sense of community. The Internet and Higher Education, 9 (3): 153–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lucia, A., Francese, R., Passero, I., and Tortora, G. (2009). Development and evaluation of a virtual campus on Second Life: The case of SecondDMI. Computers and Education, 52 (1): 220–33.Google Scholar
Downes, W. (2007). An introduction to connective knowledge. International Conference on Media, Knowledge and Education – exploring new spaces, relations and dynamics in digital media ecologies (online). https://www.downes.ca/post/33034 (accessed 30 July 2020).Google Scholar
Foster, A., Johnson, T., Liu, H. et al. (2014). Psychiatry clinical simulation online teaching modules: A multi-site prospective study of student assessments. MedEdPublish, 3, 30.Google Scholar
Fulford, C. P. and Zhang, S. (1993). Perceptions of interactions: The critical predictor in distance education. Distance Education, 7, 8–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallupe, R. B., Dennis, A. R., Cooper, W. H., et al. (1992). Electronic brainstorming and group size. The Academy of Management Journal, 35 (2): 350–69. https://doi.org/10.n.d07/256377.Google Scholar
Gunawardena, C. and Zittel, F. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computermediated conferencing environment. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11 (3): 8–26.Google Scholar
Hackman, M. Z. and Walker, K. B. (1990). Instructional communication in the televised classroom: The effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learning and satisfaction. Communication Education, 39 (3): 196–209.Google Scholar
Hickey, C. M. and McAleer, S. (2017). Designing and developing an online module: A 10-step approach. Academic Psychiatry, 41, 106–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
John-Steiner, V. (2006). Creative collaborations. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapper, C. K. (1988). Lifelong learning and distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 2 (1): 63–72. Available at: www.learntechlib.org/p/139170/ (accessed 27 March 2022).Google Scholar
Kornhaber, R., Betihavas, V., and Baber, R. J. (2015). Ethical implications of digital images for teaching and learning purposes: An integrative review. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 8, 299–305.Google Scholar
Kyaw, B. M., Posadzki, P., Paddock, S., et al. (2019). Effectiveness of digital education on communication skills among medical students: Systematic review and meta-analysis by the digital health collaboration. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21 (8). Available at: www.jmir.org/2019/8/e12967/?amp;utm_medium=twitter#Introduction (accessed 30 October 2020).Google Scholar
Kyei-Blankson, L. and Godwyll, F. (2010). An examination of learning outcomes in hyflex learning environments. The Learning Technology Library (online). Available at: www.learntechlib.org/p/35598/ (accessed 30 July 2020).Google Scholar
Leh, A. S. (2001). Computer-mediated communication and social presence in a distance learning environment. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7 (2): 109–28.Google Scholar
Mankey, V. L. (2011). Using multimodal and multimedia tools in the psychiatric education of diverse learners: Examples from the mental status exam. Academic Psychiatry, 35, 335–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., and Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: when presenting more materials results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 187.Google Scholar
Murray, J. M. D., Hale, F., and Dozier, M. (2015). Use and perception of Second Life by distance learners: Comparison with other communication media. International Journal of E-learning and Distance Education, 30 (2).Google Scholar
Olapiriyakul, K. and Scher, J. M. (2006). A guide to establishing hybrid learning courses: Employing information technology to create a new learning experience, and a case study. The Internet and Higher Education, 3 (4): 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partlow, K. M. and Gibbs, W. J. (2003). Indicators of constructivist principles in internet-based courses. J. Comput. High. Educ. 14 (68). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940939.Google Scholar
Peters, O. (1992). Some observations on dropping out in distance education. Distance Education, 13: n.d4–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 6 (1): 21–40.Google Scholar
Prober, C. G. and Heath, C. (2012). Lecture halls without lectures – a proposal for medical education. New England Journal of Medicine, 366, 1657–9.Google Scholar
Rovai, A. (2002). Building a sense of community at a distance. The International Review of Open and Distributed Learning, 3 (1): 1–16.Google Scholar
Russo, T. C. and Campbell, S. W. (2004). Perceptions of mediated presence in an asynchronous online course: Interplay of communication behaviours and medium. Distance Education, 25 (2): 215–32.Google Scholar
Schmidt, H. G., Rotgans, J. I., Yew, E. H. J. (2011). The process of problem-based learning: What works and why. Medical Education, 45, 792–806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shea, P., Sau, L. C., and Pickett, A. (2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 9 (3): 175–90.Google Scholar
Simkins, S., Maier, M., and Rhem, J. (2009). Just-In-Time Teaching: Across the Disciplines, and Across the Academy (New Pedagogies and Practices for Teaching in Higher Education). Virginia: Stylus Publishing.Google Scholar
Slagter van Tron, P. J. and Bishop, M. J. (2009). Theoretical foundations for enhancing social connectedness in online learning environments. Distance Education, 30 (3): 291–315.Google Scholar
Smith, S., Hanson, J. L., Tewksbury, L. R., et al. (2007). Teaching patient communication skills to medical students: A review of randomized controlled trials. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 30 (1): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strong, K. and Hutchins, H. M. (2009). Connectivism: A theory for learning in a world of growing complexity. Journal of Applied Research in Workplace E-Learning, 1 (1): 53–67.Google Scholar
Vallance, A. K., Hemani, A., Fernandez, V., and Livingstone., D. (2014). Using virtual worlds for role play simulation in child and adolescent psychiatry: An evaluation study. The Psychiatric Bulletin, 8 (5): 204–10.Google Scholar
Walter, D. A., Rosenquist, P. B., and Bawtinhimer, G. (2004). Distance learning technologies in the training of psychiatry residents: A critical assessment. Academic Psychiatry, 28, 60–5.Google Scholar
Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52–90.Google Scholar
Warren, N., Parker, S., Khoo, T., Cabral, S., and Turner, J. (2020). Challenges and solutions when developing online interactive psychiatric education. Australasian Psychiatry, 28 (3): 359–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1039856220901477.Google Scholar
Wiecha, J., Heyden, R., Sternthal, E., and Merialdi, M. (2010). Learning in a virtual world: Experience with using second life for medical education. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 12. e1. 10.2196/jmir.1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.