In a recent effort to replicate the results, the authors discovered an error in the code to produce Table 3 of the article. The corrected table and the accompanying text are below (corrected text is in bold). The authors apologize for the error.
p. 594 corrected paragraph
The data also allow us to identify the specific factors potentially undermining valid descriptive inference. In the real world, the costs of behaviour are highly salient. When taking action over grievances, costs include time, money and political risk, among others. Table 3 presents reasons given by respondents for not taking any given action for both hypothetical and real land grievances.33 Strikingly, the lack of power (specifically, “the power of the other party is too great”) is the second single most important reason (reported by 18 27 per cent of respondents) for not taking action in the context of real-world grievances, while it is a minor factor (reported by only 2 3 per cent of respondents) in the hypothetical vignette. The data show, perhaps surprisingly that lack of knowledge is equally less salient for aggrieved households in the real world (23 9 percent, compared to 21 24 per cent responding to the hypothetical vignette), suggesting that, for those who do take action, experiencing a real grievance may drive searches for knowledge and knowledge acquisition, something unanticipated by respondents to the hypothetical vignette. Similarly, time, money and the risk of losing connections are not obstacles to taking action in the context of real-world land disputes. Finally, not surprisingly, 20 21 per cent of respondents to the hypothetical vignette cite the lack of importance (specifically, “too trivial”), while only 6 8 per cent of respondents with real-world grievances cite this reason for taking no action, i.e. “lumping it.”
p. 595 corrected table
Reasons for Taking No Action in Hypothetical and Real-world Land Disputes
Source: Author’s survey.
p. 598 corrected sentence
Yet Indeed, Table 3 2 shows that in the hypothetical scenario, 2 per cent of some respondents cite the lack of money as a reason for not taking action, whereas 6 per cent of no respondents with actual grievances cite the lack of money as a reason for taking no action.
