Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-46n74 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T20:29:17.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tools to improve mine closure: 10 years of research in integration of environment in the mine life cycle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2024

A response to the following question: What is good mine closure?

Isabelle Demers*
Affiliation:
Research Institute on Mines and Environment, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda, QC, Canada
*
Corresponding author: Isabelle Demers; Email: Isabelle.demers@uqat.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mine closure can be approached by several points of view, from the technical, engineering, ecological, up to social and governance aspects. The definition of a good mine closure should cover most, if not all, of these aspects. This article provides a review of technical and engineering-oriented research work as a partial answer to the question ‘what is good mine closure’. The article presents a ten-year research program realized in the framework of a Canada Research Chair in integration of environment in the mine life cycle. Research projects aimed at better planning mine closure and mine site reclamation from the early stages of a mining project life cycle are exposed as possible steps to strive for optimal mine waste management. At the exploration stage, geo-environmental characterization and modeling are proposed as tools to improve mine waste management planification. During mine operations, environmental desulfurization is suggested as a method to reduce environmental risks associated with sulfidic tailings and waste rock. Indeed, research has shown that acid mine drainage and metal leaching can be significantly limited via desulfurization. At the closure stage, desulfurized tailings can be used to replace at least part of natural materials used for reclamation cover systems. Research work done on other types of mine waste, such as waste rock and water treatment sludge, also show good potential for their reuse as closure material. All these tools can be integrated into the mine life cycle to better plan for closure, which ultimately will make mine closure more sustainable.

Information

Type
Impact Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Illustration of the research program topics.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Representation of waste rock characterization in the future open pit Akasaba mine; red zone is the intermediate domain, green zone is the mafic domain, yellow zone is the dacitic domain. Dots represent samples with ratios of neutralization potential RNP > 3 (green) and RNP < 1 (red). (Vermette, 2018).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Geo-environmental modelling process, from static to dynamic mine waste management. Modified from Toubri et al. (2021c).

Figure 3

Table 1. Optimal desulfurization conditions obtained in three studies

Figure 4

Figure 4. Degree of liberation of pyrite and carbonates by size fraction for waste rock from Centinela and Amaruq mines.

Figure 5

Figure 5. pH of column test effluents where desulfurized tailings were placed as cover over sulfidic tailings. T: uncovered tailings 12% S, LC: desulfurized tailings 0.26% S, CMC: desulfurized tailings 0.14% S, GC: desulfurized tailings 0.12% S, WC: desulfurized tailings 0.15% S (modified from Demers et al. 2020).

Figure 6

Figure 6. Gold recovery by cyanidation and gravity processes performed on three desulfurization concentrates.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Field experimental cell representing a monolayer cover made with low-sulfide tailings with elevated water table.

Figure 8

Table 2. Cumulative sulfate release rates per size fraction for three waste rocks (adapted from Sylvain et al. 2023)

Figure 9

Figure 8. Arsenic concentration evolution in leachate from weathering cells kinetic test performed on feed tailings to environmental desulfurization and desulfurized tailings produced with previous treatments: agitation or regrinding. Modified from Skandrani (2019).