Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-xc2tv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-01-17T10:19:47.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

From overlooked to just right: putting the focus on metronidazole infusion timing for colorectal surgical prophylaxis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2026

Peter Oakes*
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases & International Health, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health, Charlottesville, VA, USA
Lindsay E. Donohue
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
Sunny Chiao
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
Susan Ketcham
Affiliation:
Perioperative Services, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
Traci Hedrick
Affiliation:
Colon and Rectal Surgery, Division of General Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
Rachele Olivier
Affiliation:
Department of Quality and Performance Improvement, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
Amy J. Mathers
Affiliation:
Division of Infectious Diseases & International Health, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health, Charlottesville, VA, USA
*
Corresponding author: Peter Oakes; Email: poakes16@gmail.com

Abstract

Preoperative prophylaxis efficacy depends on antibiotic infusion completion before incision. In our colorectal program, metronidazole often wasn’t completed on time, in contrast to cefazolin. A multidisciplinary effort standardized its administration timing, improving infusion completion rates. We evaluated the impact of this intervention on surgical site infections in colorectal surgery.

Information

Type
Concise Communication
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© University of Virginia, 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Introduction

Both the timing and selection of antimicrobial prophylaxis (AP) reduce the risk of surgical site infections (SSI), but the logistics around varied infusion times are often overlooked. Reference de Jonge, Gans and Atema1 National AP guidelines jointly issued in 2013 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP), the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Surgical Infection Society, and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America recommend that AP should be infused (both initiated and completed) within a 60 min window before incision. Reference Bratzler, Dellinger and Olsen2 However, this recommendation is based primarily on studies focused on first- and second-generation cephalosporins infused via rapid intravenous (IV) push over a number of minutes by an anesthesiologist prior to skin incision. Vancomycin and fluoroquinolones are well known exceptions and are permitted a longer 120 min infusion window, due to rate limitations precluding the ability to completely administer doses in the shorter time frame. Subsequent studies have validated the consequences of failing to adhere to this earlier window for vancomycin, noting increased SSI rates when infusions are initiated too close to the time of incision and describing the significant resource allocation required to coordinate the complex logistics of an operating room setting. Reference Borja, Sharma and Amendolia3,Reference Malhotra, Piazza and Demoor4 Despite the need for slow IV drip administration and a long half-life with active metabolites promoting adequate tissue concentrations for prolonged periods of time, metronidazole (MTZ) has not been clearly specified in this guideline carve-out, and one prior study has noted challenges with completing MTZ infusions prior to skin incision when given as a 30 min infusion by anesthesia in the operating room. Reference Danan, Smith and Kruer5

MTZ IV infusion is only commercially supplied as a diluted and neutralized 500 mg/100 mL solution, as the undiluted reconstituted product is not appropriate for direct IV injection due to its low pH. In the United States, it is indicated for use as preoperative AP in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery (COLO) at a dose of 15 mg/kg (approximately 1 g for a 70 kg patient) infused over 30 – 60 min and completed approximately 1 hour prior to incision, followed by intraoperative re-dosing every 6 hours with 7.5 mg/kg (i.e., ∼500 mg). 6 Alternatively, the 2013 ASHP guidelines suggest an initial MTZ dose of 500 mg preoperatively within 60 min without any intraoperative re-dosing. Reference Bratzler, Dellinger and Olsen2 While institutional practices vary, published evidence to support the safety of infusions over less than 15 – 30 min is sparse. Reference Dellinger7

Although other AP options exist that provide the spectrum of activity required for procedures entering the gastrointestinal tract, the combination of cefazolin and MTZ is preferred by our institution, a 600-bed academic medical center, given studies suggesting lower rates of SSI when compared to cephamycins 6 and the unnecessary additional spectrum of ertapenem. Longitudinal quality and performance improvement efforts around COLO SSI at our institution are coordinated via a multidisciplinary coalition comprising key stakeholders in Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Prevention, Colorectal Surgery, Perioperative Nursing, Anesthesiology, Antimicrobial Stewardship, and Pharmacy. As part of our investigation into opportunities for improvement with respect to AP, we noted that MTZ initiation was frequently documented to be given by anesthesia within just minutes of, or even after, incision in the operating room. Herein, we report the results of a focused intervention to optimize timing of preoperative COLO AP, with a focus on MTZ.

Methods

We postulated that we could improve the number of COLO cases receiving a complete MTZ infusion within an expanded goal time frame of 120 min preincision by shifting administration to a preoperative nursing responsibility (Figure 1). To support this, we updated our electronic medical record (EMR; EPIC, Madison, WI) preoperative COLO order set to include the following MTZ administration instructions: “To be given by preop nurse via infusion pump over 30 min within 120 min PRIOR TO procedure.” Education was provided to all involved services affected by this change, including surgeons, pharmacists, preoperative nursing staff, and anesthesia providers. Following implementation, we compared baseline characteristics, urgency class, rates of correct AP infusion, and incidence of SSI among all patients undergoing COLO procedures in the pre- (6/19/2022 – 10/18/2023) and postintervention (10/19/23 – 2/19/2025) periods using data extracted via custom query of our EMR reporting database supplemented by paired chart review.

Results

Patients in the preintervention group were younger and more likely to undergo an elective procedure (Table 1). In the preintervention group, MTZ doses were seldom initiated and completed within the specified preincision window of 60 min (< 1%, n = 4/671) with a median initiation time of only 13 min, too close to incision to allow for complete infusion (i.e., < 30 mins) (Table 1). Shifting the infusion to preoperative nursing and widening the allowable preincision initiation window significantly improved the proportion of doses at goal postintervention (49%, n = 332/671), with a median MTZ initiation time of 98 min prior to incision. In contrast, there was no change in the proportion of correctly infused cefazolin doses. There was not a significant difference in the incidence of SSI (from 46.5 per 100,000 cases to 50.9 per 100,000 cases).

Table 1. Baseline demographics and outcomes

MTZ, metronidazole; SSI, surgical site infection. Data are reported as n (%), unless otherwise specified.

Discussion

This quality improvement project highlights the importance of paying attention to infusion timing for perioperative antibiotics that are not β-lactams, using MTZ as a case example. Unlike cefazolin, which can be administered rapidly, MTZ requires a longer infusion. Evidence suggests that administering antimicrobials 30 – 120 min before incision is more effective than the previously recommended 15 – 30 min window. When administered in the operating room, infusions were often incomplete at the time of incision, potentially reducing prophylactic effectiveness. Reference Hawn, Richman and Vick8

Optimizing perioperative antimicrobial administration can be challenging and needs to be recognized as a patient priority to get multidisciplinary team engagement to overcome workflow barriers. Reference Tan, Naik and Lingard9 Waiting for completion in the operating room was viewed as impractical due to concerns about workflow and case delays. Not only did this process change improve adherence to prophylaxis principles, it also engaged a broader group of providers in stewardship practices and underscored the importance of considering antibiotic infusion characteristics in perioperative planning. Additionally, the intervention promoted alignment across surgical services to adopt standardized order sets, allowing for better anticipation and delivery of appropriate antibiotics before surgery.

Although no statistically significant reduction in SSI was observed, interpretation is limited by the sample size and a higher proportion of factors associated with increased SSI risk (e.g., urgent cases and older patients) in the postintervention group. Reference Hawn, Richman and Vick8 Importantly, cefazolin administration timing remained unchanged, underscoring that the effect was specific to MTZ and the process change of shifting the administration to a different group of providers and increasing the preincision time frame for initiation to 120 min. While there was a sharp increase in the proportion of MTZ being given too early (as opposed to frequently too late in the preintervention group), its pharmacodynamics and longer half-life favor an earlier rather than later administration time-similar to vancomycin. Reference Bratzler, Dellinger and Olsen2 In summary, recognizing infusion time differences in dual-agent prophylaxis and establishing different practitioners in giving different AP to ensure completion before surgery may be essential to maximize the effectiveness of perioperative antimicrobials.

Figure 1. Schematic detailing change in metronidazole infusion timing and location. (T-0, time of incision; IV, intravenous; MTZ, metronidazole).

Acknowledgments

There was no outside financial support for this study.

Author contribution

PCO: acquisition of the data, analysis and interpretation of the data, aiding in drafting of the manuscript as well as its revision.

LED: Aiding in drafting of the manuscript as well as its revision, provided recommendations from a pharmacy perspective including logistics.

SC: Aiding in manuscript revision, provided recommendations and provided an anesthesiology perspective on systems processes.

SK: Contributed to implementation of changes as outlined above from the perspective of nursing.

TH: Provided a surgical perspective to the above logistical changes.

RO: Contributed to implementation of changes as outlined above from the perspective of nursing. Acted as a coordinator between the various parties.

AJM: As senior investigator, aiding in drafting of the manuscript as well as its revision and directed overall direction of the investigation.

Financial support

PCO was funded by the National Institute of Health (Bethesda, MD, USA) training grant 5T32AI007046.

Competing interests

PCO, LED, SC, SK, TH, RO, and AJM report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

References

de Jonge, SW, Gans, SL, Atema, JJ et al. Timing of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in 54,552 patients and the risk of surgical site infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e6903. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratzler, DW, Dellinger, EP, Olsen, KM et al. American Society of Health-System P, Infectious Diseases Society of A, Surgical Infection S, Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of A. clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2013;14:73156. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2013.9999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borja, AJ, Sharma, N, Amendolia, O et al. Quality initiative for the administration of Vancomycin Prophylaxis in Penicillin-allergic neurosurgery patients. Cureus 2021;13:e18623. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18623.Google Scholar
Malhotra, NR, Piazza, M, Demoor, R et al. Impact of reduced preincision antibiotic infusion time on surgical site infection rates: A retrospective Cohort Study. Ann Surg 2020;271:774780. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danan, E, Smith, J, Kruer, RM et al. Use and effectiveness of peri-operative Cefotetan versus Cefazolin plus Metronidazole for prevention of surgical site infection in abdominal surgery patients. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2018;19:388396. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2018.010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baxter Healthcare Corporation. Metronidazole Injection, USP in plastic container. 2025. Deerfield, IL: Baxter Healthcare Corporation.Google Scholar
Dellinger, EP. Cephalosporin plus Metronidazole for surgical prophylaxis. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2018;19:359361. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2018.023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawn, MT, Richman, JS, Vick, CC et al. Timing of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis and the risk of surgical site infection. JAMA Surg 2013;148:649657. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tan, JA, Naik, VN, Lingard, L. Exploring obstacles to proper timing of prophylactic antibiotics for surgical site infections. Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15:3238. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.01253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Baseline demographics and outcomes

Figure 1

Figure 1. Schematic detailing change in metronidazole infusion timing and location. (T-0, time of incision; IV, intravenous; MTZ, metronidazole).