Hostname: page-component-77c78cf97d-v4t4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-24T04:10:28.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Decoupling of Standard Implementation from Certification: Does Quality of ISO 14001 Implementation Affect Facilities’ Environmental Performance?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Deepa Aravind  and
Petra Christmann
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The literature on certifiable management standards has not paid sufficient attention to implementation of standard requirements in certified firms. Firms that obtain standard certification to achieve the legitimacy benefits of certification may not implement standard requirements sufficiently to realize the standard’s intended performance outcomes. We argue that such decoupling of implementation from certification threatens the effectiveness of certifiable standards as governance mechanisms for firms’ environmental conduct because standard certification may not accurately signal firms’ superior environmental performance to external stakeholders. Empirical findings based on the ISO 14001 standard at the facility level support this view: Quality of standard implementation affects facilities’ environmental performance, and environmental performance of certified and non-certified facilities does not differ significantly for the overall sample and low-quality implementers, while high-quality implementers have better environmental performance than their non-certified counterparts. We provide recommendations for increasing the effectiveness of governance systems for firm conduct based on certifiable standards.

Information

Type
Special Section Accountability in a Global Economy: The Emergence of International Accountability Standards to Advance Corporate Social Responsibility
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , January 2011 , pp. 73 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Ahire, S. L., Waller, M. A., & Golhar, D. Y. 1996. Quality management in TQM versus non-TQM firms: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 13: 8–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, R. N. L., Amaral, D., Darnall, N., Gallagher, D. R., Edwards, D., Hutson, A., D’Amore, C., Sun, L., & Zhang, Y. 2003. Environmental management systems: Do they improve performance? Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
Aravind, D., & Christmann, P. 2007. Substantive versus symbolic implementation of ISO 14001: The Role of Corporate Headquarters. Best Paper Proceedings of the Academy of Management Conference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aravind, D., & Christmann, P. 2008. Institutional and resource-based determinants of substantive implementation of ISO 14001. Best Paper Proceedings of the Academy of Management Conference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balzarova, M. A., & Castka, P. 2008. Underlying mechanisms in the maintenance of ISO 14001 environmental management system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16: 1949–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bansal, P., & Bogner, W. C. 2002. Deciding on ISO 14001: Economics, institutions, and context. Long Range Planning, 35: 269–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bansal, P., & Hunter, T. 2003. Strategic explanations for early adoption of ISO 14001. Journal of Business Ethics, 46: 289–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. 2000. Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 717–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barla, P. 2007. ISO 14001 certification and environmental performance in Quebec’s pulp and paper industry. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 53: 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, V., & Lewis, T. 1994. Outliers in statistical data: New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. 1980. Regression diagnostics. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boiral, O. 2003. ISO 9000: Outside the iron cage. Organization Science, 14: 720–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boiral, O. 2007. Corporate greening through ISO 14001: A rational myth? Organization Science, 18: 127–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boiral, O., & Roy, M.-J. 2007. ISO 9000: Integration rationales and organizational impacts. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 27: 226–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boiral, O., & Sala, J.-M. 1998. Environmental management: Should industry adopt ISO 14001 standards? Business Horizons, 41: 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. T. 1955. The informant in quantitative research. American Journal of Sociology, 60: 339–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. 1959. Convergent and divergent discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56: 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cashore, B. 2002. Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: How non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 15: 503–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. 2001. Globalization and the environment: Determinants of firm self-regulation in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 32: 439–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. 2006. Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: Determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37: 863–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claver, E., & Tari, J. J. 2003. Levels of quality management in certified firms. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 14: 981–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darnall, N. 2001. Adopting ISO 14001: Why some firms mandate certification while others encourage it. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Research Conference for the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management Fall conference, Washington Monarch Hotel, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Darnall, N. 2003. Why U.S. firms certify to ISO 14001: An institutional and resource-based view. Paper presented at the Best Paper Proceedings of the Academy of Management Conference, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
Darnall, N., & Sides, S. 2008. Assessing the performance of voluntary environmental programs: Does certification matter? Policy Studies Journal, 36: 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delmas, M. A. 2002. The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and in the United States: An institutional perspective. Policy Sciences, 35: 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillman, D. A. 2000. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, T. J., & Judge, W. Q. 2001. Total Quality Management implementation and competitive advantage: The role of structural control and exploration. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 158–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ecologia. 2002. An ISO greenhouse gas standard. Opportunity or barrier to sustainable development? http://www.ecologia.org/ems/ghg/ghgstandard.html.Google Scholar
EPA. 2006. Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Program Fact Sheet.Google Scholar
Fowler, F. J. 1993. Survey research methods. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Gaither, N., & Glorfeld, L. 1985. An evaluation of the use of tests of significance in organizational behavior research. Academy of Management Review, 10: 787–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, D. U., & Rasche, A. 2007. Discourse ethics and social accountability: The ethics of SA8000. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17: 187–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Benito, J., & Gonzalez-Benito, O. 2008. Operations management practices linked to the adoption of ISO 14001: An empirical analysis of Spanish manufacturers. International Journal of Production Economics, 113: 60–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, M. W. 1991. Business and environmental ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1: 169–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISO. 2004. Environmental management systems: General guidelines on principles, systems and supporting techniques (ISO 14004: 2004). Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
ISO. 2008. The ISO Survey—2008.Google Scholar
Jiang, R. J., & Bansal, P. 2003. Seeing the need for ISO 14001. Journal of Management Studies, 40: 1047–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
John, G., & Reve, T. 1982. The reliability and validity of key informant data from dyadic relationships in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 19: 517–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassinis, G., & Vafeas, N. 2006. Stakeholder pressures and environmental performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 145–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. 2000. Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s Responsible Care Program. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 698–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, A. A., Lenox, M. J., & Terlaak, A. 2005. The strategic use of decentralized institutions: Exploring certification with the ISO 14001 management standard. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 1091–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klassen, R. D., & Whybark, D. C. 1999. The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 599–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. 1996. The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 21: 1055–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, D. M., Seo, M. S., & Seo, Y. C. 2002. A study of compliance with environmental regulations of ISO 14001 certified companies in Korea. Journal of Environmental Management, 65: 347–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNamara, G. M., Haleblian, J., & Dykes, B. J. 2008. The performance implications of participating in an acquisition wave: Early mover advantages, bandwagon effects, and the moderating influence of industry characteristics and acquirer characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 113–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melnyk, S. A., Sroufe, R. P., & Calantone, R. 2003. Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21: 329–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendel, P. J. 2002. International standardization and global governance: The spread of quality and environmental management standards. In Hoffman, A. J. & Ventresca, M. J. (Eds.), Organizations, policy, and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives: 407–31. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. 1977. Institutionalized organization: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83: 340–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. W., Scott, W. R., & Deal, T. 1983. Institutional and technical sources of organizational structure: Explaining the structure of educational organizations. In Scott, R. (Ed.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality: 45–67. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Moore, D., Tetlock, P., Tanlu, L., & Bazerman, M. 2006. Conflicts of interest and the case of auditor independence: Moral seduction and strategic issue cycling. Academy of Management Review, 31: 10–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naveh, E., & Marcus, A. A. 2004. When does the ISO 9000 quality assurance standard lead to performance improvement? Assimilation and going beyond. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51: 352–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naveh, E., & Marcus, A. A. 2005. Achieving competitive advantage through implementing a replicable management standard: Installing and using ISO 9000. Journal of Operations Management, 24: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nawrocka, D., & Parker, T. 2009. Finding the connection: Environmental management systems and environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17: 601–07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, D. 1993. The seal of approval (earning ISO certification). Small Business Reports, 18: 57–61.Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. 1994. Psychometric theory, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, D. 2002. Monitoring the monitors: A critique of corporate third-party labor monitoring. In Jenkins, R., Pearson, R. and Seyfang, G. (Eds.), Corporate responsibility and ethical trade: Codes of conduct in the global economy. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, D. 2003. Outsourcing regulation: Analyzing nongovernmental systems of labor standards and monitoring. Policy Studies Journal, 31: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. 2004. Regulatory convergence in nongovernmental regimes? Cross-national adoption of ISO 14001 certifications. Journal of Politics, 66: 885–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. 2005a. Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities’ environmental performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24: 745–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. 2005b. Green clubs and voluntary governance: ISO 14001 and firms’ regulatory compliance. American Journal of Political Science, 49: 235–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, M. 1997. The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
QSU. 2006. ISO 14001 Worldwide Certified Company Directory.Google Scholar
Rao, S. S., Raghunathan, T. S., & Solis, L. E. 1999. The best commonly followed practices in the human resource dimension of quality management in new industrializing countries. The case of China, India and Mexico. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 16: 215–26.Google Scholar
Rappoport, A., & FlahertyM., F. M., F. 1992. Corporate responses to environmental challenges: Initiatives by multinational management. New York: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
Rondinelli, D., & Vastag, G. 2000. Panacea, common sense, or just a label? The value of ISO 14001 environmental management systems. European Management Journal, 18: 494–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 1998. Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 363–75.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russo, M. V. 2001. Institutional change and theories of organizational strategy: ISO 14001 and toxic emissions in the electronics industry. Best Papers Proceedings of the Academy of Management.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, R. W. 1987. The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32: 493–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seddon, J. 1997. Ten arguments against ISO 9000. Managing Service Quality, 7: 162–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sroufe, R. P. 2003. Effects of environmental management systems on environmental management practices and operation. Production and Operations Management, 12: 416–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenzel, P. L. 2000. Can the ISO 14000 series environmental management standards provide a viable alternative to government regulations? American Business Law Journal, 37: 237–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, T. A., Humphrey, C., & Gor, V. 2000. Great expectations: The dubious financial legacy of quality audits. British Journal of Management, 11: 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terlaak, A. 2007. Order without law? The role of certified management standards in shaping socially desired firm behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 32: 968–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. 1983. Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880–1935. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations. 1993. Environmental management in transnational corporations: Report on the benchmark corporate environmental survey. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Van Der Wiele, T., & Brown, A. 1997. ISO 9000 series experiences in small and medium-sized enterprises. Total Quality Management, 8: S300–S304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waddock, S. 2008. Building a new institutional infrastructure for corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22: 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeung, G., & Mok, V. 2005. What are the impacts of implementing ISOs on the competitiveness of manufacturing industry in China? Journal of World Business, 40: 139–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, H., & Schmeidler, P. 2009. Why do standardized ISO 14001 environmental management systems lead to heterogeneous environmetnal outcomes? Business Strategy and the Environment, 18: 469–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucker, L. G. 1987. Institutional theories of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 13: 443–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar