Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-8p85h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-15T14:12:28.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The biophysics of superoxide dismutase-1 and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2019

Gareth S. A. Wright
Affiliation:
Molecular Biophysics Group, Institute of Integrative Biology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK
Svetlana V. Antonyuk
Affiliation:
Molecular Biophysics Group, Institute of Integrative Biology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK
S. Samar Hasnain*
Affiliation:
Molecular Biophysics Group, Institute of Integrative Biology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK
*
Author for correspondence: S. Samar Hasnain, E-mail: s.s.hasnain@liverpool.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Few proteins have come under such intense scrutiny as superoxide dismutase-1 (SOD1). For almost a century, scientists have dissected its form, function and then later its malfunction in the neurodegenerative disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). We now know SOD1 is a zinc and copper metalloenzyme that clears superoxide as part of our antioxidant defence and respiratory regulation systems. The possibility of reduced structural integrity was suggested by the first crystal structures of human SOD1 even before deleterious mutations in the sod1 gene were linked to the ALS. This concept evolved in the intervening years as an impressive array of biophysical studies examined the characteristics of mutant SOD1 in great detail. We now recognise how ALS-related mutations perturb the SOD1 maturation processes, reduce its ability to fold and reduce its thermal stability and half-life. Mutant SOD1 is therefore predisposed to monomerisation, non-canonical self-interactions, the formation of small misfolded oligomers and ultimately accumulation in the tell-tale insoluble inclusions found within the neurons of ALS patients. We have also seen that several post-translational modifications could push wild-type SOD1 down this toxic pathway. Recently we have come to view ALS as a prion-like disease where both the symptoms, and indeed SOD1 misfolding itself, are transmitted to neighbouring cells. This raises the possibility of intervention after the initial disease presentation. Several small-molecule and biologic-based strategies have been devised which directly target the SOD1 molecule to change the behaviour thought to be responsible for ALS. Here we provide a comprehensive review of the many biophysical advances that sculpted our view of SOD1 biology and the recent work that aims to apply this knowledge for therapeutic outcomes in ALS.

Information

Type
Major Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2019
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Dismutation of superoxide anion. (a) The spontaneous dismutation of superoxide to oxygen and hydrogen peroxide (McCord and Fridovich, 1968). (b) Two steps in the SOD1 catalysed dismutation of superoxide which cyclically reduces then oxidises the copper centre (Klug et al., 1972).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. The β-strand, loop and barrel structure of human SOD1. (a) β-barrel component of human SOD1 with approximately 15 Å diameter as described for bovine SOD1 (Thomas et al., 1974). (b) Greek-key assembly of SOD1 β-strands showing loops which facilitate position swap of β-strands 4 and 6 in orange. (c) Arrangement of human SOD1 secondary structures within the β-barrel with residues involved in copper and zinc binding highlighted blue and grey respectively.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Human SOD1 metal binding and dimerisation regions. Upper panel – Copper and zinc coordinating (purple and light blue respectively) sites are linked by His63 (orange). The copper ion (blue) can be found solvent exposed at two positions dependent on oxidation state while the zinc ion (grey) is internalised. Lower panel – Hydrogen bonding (orange) at the SOD1 dimer interface is mediated by backbone interactions of Ile151 with Gly51 and Gly114.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. The relationship between eukaryotic Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase codon conservation and human SOD1 ALS mutations. (a) The frequency of ALS mutations (purple bars), non-ALS polymorphisms (orange spots) and mutations with a disputed role in ALS (green spots) in the human SOD1 primary structure. Known truncation mutants are shown with black arrows and areas that differ from the wild-type sequence following a frame-shift mutation are shown in orange. The SOD1 secondary structure is also shown with β-strands coloured as in Fig. 2. (b) Consensus sequence of eukaryotic CuZnSODs. Light blue indicates identity between human SOD1 and the eukaryotic consensus, dark blue indicates conservative substitutions and orange indicates non-conservative substitutions. (c) Human SOD1 structure showing amino acids with >70% sequence conservation across eukaryotes highlighted in light blue. (d) Human SOD1 amino acids ranked by eukaryotic conservation (light blue). Sites that have at least one ALS-causing mutation are highlighted in purple. Sites that are highly conserved are more likely to have at least one ALS mutation.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. The location of commonly studied ALS mutants within the SOD1 dimer structure. Shown are those mutants that have been described in crystal structures and have phenotypic data available from more than two cases (Wang et al., 2008).

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Local structural destabilisation of SOD1 by ALS mutations in crystallography. Metal binding mutants; Ala4Val shows repulsion around the mutation site while Ile113Thr and Ile149Thr disrupt Van der Waals interactions at the dimer interface and the SOD1 core, respectively. Loop mutants; Gly93Ala causes repulsion between loop III and loop V and Gly37Arg causes repulsion between Loop III and Loop II. β-barrel mutants; Leu38Val disrupts Van der Waals interactions in the SOD1 core and His43Arg breaks a network of stabilising hydrogen bonds. Metal binding-region mutants; Gly85Arg causes repulsion and zinc loop disruption whereas His46Arg prevents copper binding and destabilises the electrostatic loop. Hydrogen bonds are shown in orange lines, repulsive interactions are shown as arrows, Van der Waals interactions are shown as dotted lines.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. The SOD1 folding pathway. Step 1: Nascent and completely unstructured SOD1 folding is nucleated by residues in β-strands 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7. Step 2: The molecular chaperone activity of hCCS then promotes folding of the remaining β-barrel structure and disulphide subloops. Step 3: SOD1 binds zinc and disulphide formation imparts stability on the disulphide sub-loop. This weakens hCCS-SOD1 heterodimer affinity. Step 4: Strong SOD1 interface Gly51-Ile151 hydrogen bonding and a stable dimer interface both promote SOD1 homodimerisation. Steps 5 and 6: hCCS mediated folding can be circumvented through spontaneous β-barrel organisation and zinc binding however the mechanism of disulphide formation, and therefore the formation of a stable dimer interface, through this hCCS-independent route is not entirely clear. SOD1 β-strands are coloured as in Fig. 2.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. The SOD1 disulphide sub-loop dimer interface. (a) The disulphide subloop forms extensive contacts across the SOD1 dimer interface. (b) S–S bond lengths found in all human SOD1 structures in the Protein Data Bank. The 2.02–2.04 Å average for all protein structures (Thornton, 1981; Petersen et al., 1999) is shown in grey. By excluding bond lengths above 2.3 Å the mean SOD1 S–S bond length is found to be 2.08 Å, shown in blue.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. The structure of SOD1 aggregates. (a) SOD1 β-strands in the N-terminal region of the protein are found to be structured in the metal-free state by NMR (Banci et al., 2009). These are also commonly found to form the core of SOD1 aggregates as determined by modelling, antibody reactivity, resistance to proteolytic cleavage and solid-state NMR (green) while the absence of the C-terminal region in truncated forms of SOD1 negates its role in aggregation (red). (b) SOD1 β-strand 3 forms fibril structures with the alignment of each peptide parallel to the direction of strand elongation in contrast to traditional amyloid where the constituent protein or peptide assembles perpendicular to the direction of propagation.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. SOD1 aggregate growth. SOD1 fibril growth is commonly assayed in vitro using a fluorescent dye such as thioflavin T. Fibril growth is preceded by a lag phase where little aggregation takes place. Aggregation is then nucleated in a stochastic process leading to exponential growth. Growth plateaus when all available SOD1 has been incorporated into aggregates. Each process can be modified by changing the SOD1 mutant under investigation, its concentration, adding aggregate seeds or sequestering protein in non-fibrillar aggregates.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Secondary post-translational modifications and drug molecule interactions with human SOD1. Post-translational modifications observed ex vivo or in vitro are listed along with several structures of drug molecule interactions which have been validated crystallographically at Trp32 and Cys111 sites. Cysteinylation of Cys111 is the only native SOD1 post-translational modification which has been crystallographically characterised and was found to be destabilising (Auclair et al., 2013a, 2013b).