Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-mzsfj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-18T06:00:12.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Crisis Management Capability of Japan's Self Defense Forces for UN Peacekeeping, Counter-Terrorism, and Disaster Relief

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2013

KATSUMI ISHIZUKA
KATSUMI ISHIZUKA*
Affiliation:
Department of International Business Management, Kyoei University, Japanishizuka@kyoei.ac.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the crisis management capabilities of Japan's Self Defense Forces (SDF) in the areas of United Nations (UN) peacekeeping, counter-terrorism, and disaster relief. The three types of overseas operations were all initiated by Japan as a response to international crises. While SDF crisis management capabilities for UN peacekeeping operations have steadily evolved, room for improvement remains. For example, Japan's commitment to logistic and rapid deployment missions could be strengthened. Regarding the second type of operations, counter-terrorism, Japan's crisis management capabilities were enhanced by the passing of a novel Anti-Terrorism Law in October 2001 after the 9/11 attacks. The law legalized a SDF oil-fuelling mission in the Indian Ocean in support of the US-led war on terror in Afghanistan. Compared to the first two types of missions, SDF crisis management capabilities in disaster relief are the least controversial. This is due to the nature of the SDF as politically neutral and their humanitarian and non-military activities. This article highlights and compares the strengths and weaknesses of Japan's capabilities in the three types of SDF overseas operations. It demonstrates that a number of problem areas remain, including the need for legal amendment as well as the enhancement of public support and political consensus. The Japanese government and the SDF should face up to these challenges so that Japan can become better positioned to react quickly to crisis situations that require the dispatch of the SDF.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Japanese Journal of Political Science , Volume 14 , Special Issue 2: Japan's Crisis Management amid Growing Complexity: In Search of New Approaches , June 2013 , pp. 201 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Kozai, S., Kokuren no heiwa iji katsudou (UN Peacekeeping Operations) (Tokyo: Yuhikaku, 1991), pp. 474–81.Google Scholar

2 Ibid., p. 18.

3 M. Leitenberg, The Participation of Japanese Military Forces in UN Peacekeeping Operations, Maryland/Tsukuba Papers on US–Japan Relations, June 1996, p. 12.

4 The Defense Agency, ‘Defense of Japan: The White Paper of the Defense Agency’, The Japan Times, 1995, p. 99.

5 Writer's field research, Dili, Timor-Leste, September 2002.

6 Department of Peacekeeping Operations, the UN, Troop and Police Contributors, www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/resources/statistics/contributors_archive_shtml. Accessed on 28 February 2013.

7 The Yomiuri Shimbun, 8 December 2012.

8 Ishizuka, K., Ireland and International Peacekeeping Operations 1960–2000: A Study of Irish Motivation (London: Frank Cass, 2005), p. 2.Google Scholar

9 M. Inoue, ‘Japan's Contributions to International Peacekeeping in the 21st Century’, MA thesis, The Faculty of The Elliot School of International Affairs, The George Washington University, pp. 19–20. May 2011.

10 Takahara, T., ‘Japan’, in Findlay, T. (ed.), Challenges for the New Peacekeepers, SIPRI Research Report No. 12 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), Chapter 3, p. 64Google Scholar.

11 A. Duplancher, ‘The Evolution of Japan's Peacekeeping Policy Explained’, unpublished M.Sc. thesis, Institute of International Relations, Leiden University, June 2011, p. 52.

12 The main territorial dispute in the South China Sea is one over the Spratly Islands, involving six sovereign states, namely, China, Taiwan, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Brunei. One of the territorial disputes in the East China Sea is over the Senkaku Islands between China, Taiwan, and Japan.

13 The Yomiuri Shimbun, 21 November 2011.

14 A. Duplancher, ‘The Evolution of Japan's Peacekeeping Policy Explained’, p. 58.

15 Asahi, H., Experiencing Nation-building in the 21st Century, Working Paper, March 2007, Japan Institute of International Affairs, p. 38Google Scholar.

16 The Japan Association for United Nations Studies (JAUNS), Towards a Diplomacy that Strengthens the United Nations: Proposal for Japan's UN Policy, June 2010, p. 11.

17 They are Japan, Australia, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia, South Korea, Malaysia, Mongolia, Nepal, New Zealand, Pakistan, the Philippines, and Thailand.

18 These are integrated planning, mediation, public affairs, DDR, peace-building, rule of law, protection of civilians, gender based violence, security management, humanitarian affairs, and human rights in the context of peace support operations.

19 Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, http://mofa.go.jp/announce/event/2009/10/1196611_1168.html. Accessed on 25 November 2011. See also, US Department of State, Diplomacy in Action, www.state.gov/t/pm/ppa/gpoi. Accessed on 25 November 2011.

20 Duplancher, ‘The evolution of Japan's peacekeeping policy explained’, p. 58.

21 Ishizuka, K., ‘Japan and UN Peace Operations’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 5 (1) (2004): 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22 The International Crisis Group (ICG), ‘China's Growing Role’, The ICG Asian Report, No. 166, 17 April 2009, p. 1.

23 Isobe, K., ‘International Missions and the SDF (in Japanese)’, The Journal of International Security, 36 (1), June 2008: 21–41Google Scholar.

24 As of November 2011, 89 member states joined UNSAS.

25 Ministry of Foreign Affairs, http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/pko/unsas.html. Accessed on 26 November 2011.

26 UN Document S/RES/1368 (2001), 12 September 2001.

27 UN Document S/RES/1371 (2001), 28 September 2001.

28 The Yomiuri Shimbun, 13 September 2001.

29 The Yomiuri Shimbun, 14 September 2001.

30 The Yomiuri Shimbun, 16 September 2001.

31 The Yomiuri Shimbun, 30 October 2001.

32 Eldridge, R. D. and Midford, P., ‘Introduction’, in Eldridge, R. D. and Midford, P. (eds.), Japanese Public Opinion and the War on Terrorism (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), p. 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33 The Yomiuri Shimbun, 18 September 2001.

34 The Japan Times, 30 December 2001.

35 The Madrid train bombing consisted of a series of coordinated bombings against the commuter train system of Madrid, Spain on the morning of 11 March 2004, three days before Spain's general elections, killing 191 people and wounding 1,800. The attacks were directed by an al-Qaeda-inspired terrorist cell, the Abu hafs al-Masri Brigade.

36 Oizumi, K., The Next Target is Japan: Asian Muslim Fundamentalists and Counter-terrorism (Tokyo: Japan Research Institute, 2004), p. 186.Google Scholar

37 Riedel, B., ‘Al Qaeda Strikes Back’, Foreign Affairs, 86 (3) (May/June 2007): 24–40Google Scholar.

38 Yoshida, M., ‘The Practice and Lesson from the International Operations by the Maritime Self-Defense Forces’, The Journal of International Security, 38 (4) (March 2001): 15Google Scholar.

39 Ozawa, I., ‘The Principles of International Security System Should be Created in Japan Now’, Sekai, November 2007, pp. 148–53Google Scholar.

40 Chuokoron, November 2007, p. 46.

41 The Economist, 20 October 2007, p. 18.

42 The Daily Yomiuri, 13 December 2008.

43 The Research Institute for Peace and Security, ‘Japan's Counter-terrorism Policy: Towards Hokkaido-Toyako G8 Sumit’, 30 January 2008, pp. 10–11.

44 A serious problem for the SDF in counter-terrorism operations is the high rate of SDF personnel committing suicide while on duty. The rate is significantly higher when compared to the US, for instance. K. Kurata, ‘Public opinions criticizing on the War on Terror’, Chikyuza, January 2008, http//chikyuza.net/modules/news3/article.php?storyid-293. Accessed on 15 July 2012.

45 K. Yanagisawa, K. ‘Review of the 30 Years History of Japan's Disaster Relief’, Gaiko (Diplomacy), 7 (2011): 56.

46 Y. Nakauchi, ‘The History of Japan's Disaster Relief and the Current Issues’, Legislation and Research, No. 323, December 2011, p. 5.

47 The Daily Yomiuri, 31 January 1995.

48 The Yomiuri Shimbun, 10 December 1995.

49 The Daily Yomiuri, 30 October 2004.

50 The Daily Yomiuri, 11 January 2005.

51 Ibid., pp. 10–11.

52 The Daily Yomiuri, 2 February 2012.

53 Nakauchi, ‘The History of Japan's Disaster Relief’, pp. 11–12; The Yomiuri Simbun, 10 September, 2010.

54 The Daily Yomiuri, 6 January 2011.

55 The Japan Times, 5 November 2011.

56 It was Japanese Prime Minister Keizo Obuchi who mentioned the term of human security for the first time when he gave a speech titled ‘The Perspective to the 21st Century: Japan and East Asia’ in Singapore in May 1998. Research and Dialogue Project, ‘Global Health, Human Security, and Japan's Contribution’, working paper, April 2008, p. 7.

57 The Yomiuri Shimbun, 23 July, 2012.