Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-f97m6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-10T18:40:59.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Design and optimisation of SMA-activated landing gear door locking mechanism of an air vehicle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2026

Samet Can Akcay
Affiliation:
Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University Mechanical Engineering Department, Türkiye
Mahmut Esad Aslan
Affiliation:
Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University Mechanical Engineering Department, Türkiye
Huseyin Cemal Tastan
Affiliation:
Turkish Aerospace, Ankara, Türkiye
Ahmet Pinarbasi*
Affiliation:
Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University Mechanical Engineering Department, Türkiye
*
Corresponding author: Ahmet Pinarbasi; Email: apinarbasi@aybu.edu.tr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Landing gear door locking mechanisms are commonly actuated using hydraulic/pneumatic or electromechanical systems. However, due to their complex structures, these systems are prone to failure and are not efficient in terms of weight and cost. This study presents the design, optimisation and experimental evaluation of a novel locking mechanism unprecedented globally driven by shape memory alloy (SMA) elements, specifically developed for hook-type landing gear door locking systems used in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The unlocking action is achieved via a NiTi-based SMA spring heated through electrical resistance, while automatic locking is ensured by preloaded tension springs. Two-dimensional kinematic analysis was then conducted to determine the pin locations of the mechanism and optimise the stroke, guaranteeing stable locking/unlocking. Subsequently, a 3D model with a minimal number of components was created, and the force requirements were evaluated through dynamic performance analyses. In prototype tests conducted on a 3D-printed model, the austenite and martensitic phase forces of the SMA over a range of extensions were measured, and the activation–recovery times were refined through iterative testing, which enabled stable locking performance. The system demonstrated competitive activation times compared to conventional solutions, re-locked via assisted cooling, and exhibited reliable switching behaviour. The dynamic analysis results of the designed system aligned well with data obtained from physical testing, validating the stability of the design. Overall, the results indicate that SMA-based actuators offer a lighter, more compact and energy-efficient alternative to traditional actuation methods in aerospace applications.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society
Figure 0

Table 1. Comparative analysis of SMA-based actuators and mechanisms in aerospaceTable 1 long description.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Figure 1 long description.Overall view of the landing gear compartment with integrated lock mechanism.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Figure 2 long description.Technical drawing of the landing gear door lock mechanism.

Figure 3

Table 2. Physical properties of the SMA actuator

Figure 4

Figure 3. Figure 3 long description.Landing gear door lock mechanism.

Figure 5

Figure 4. Figure 4 long description.Self-locking mechanism. (a) Locked state (b) unlocked state (c) self-locking state.

Figure 6

Figure 5. Figure 5 long description.Secondary safety lock.

Figure 7

Table 3. Preliminary FMEA for the locking mechanismTable 3 long description.

Figure 8

Figure 6. Figure 6 long description.Overall view of the cooling system.

Figure 9

Figure 7. Ventilation grills.

Figure 10

Figure 8. Figure 8 long description.Locked state.

Figure 11

Figure 9. Figure 9 long description.Unlocked state.

Figure 12

Figure 10. Figure 10 long description.Free body diagram of the lock mechanism.

Figure 13

Figure 11. Figure 11 long description.Dynamic analysis results indicating stable system operation based on minimum activation and maximum resistance force.

Figure 14

Figure 12. SMA stroke analysis.

Figure 15

Figure 13. Figure 13 long description.SMA force analysis.

Figure 16

Figure 14. Prototype test setup front view.

Figure 17

Figure 15. Figure 15 long description.Prototype test setup rear view.

Figure 18

Table 4. Number of turns - SMA activation force/dynamometer test

Figure 19

Figure 16. Figure 16 long description.Laboratory test setup.

Figure 20

Table 5. Tension spring - activation force/dynamometer test

Figure 21

Figure 17. Figure 17 long description.Experimental test results showing SMA activation force and resistance force for different extensions.

Figure 22

Table 6. Extension - SMA activation force/dynamometer testTable 6 long description.

Figure 23

Table 7. Extension - SMA resistance force/dynamometer testTable 7 long description.

Figure 24

Table 8. Activation time tests under varying current and voltageTable 8 long description.

Figure 25

Figure 18. Figure 18 long description.Mechanical behaviour of NiTi wire. (a) Residual strain; (b) recovered strain; (c) direct transformation stress and (d) dissipated energy versus function of the number of cycles [44].