Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-jnbmb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-01T11:06:59.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Women’s mental health: current status and evolutionary perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2026

Carol M. Worthman*
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

Abstract

Women’s mental health is commonly regarded as worse than that of men across most cultures and countries, although the pronounced female disparity for affective disorders, particularly depression and anxiety, is reversed for other mental conditions such as addiction, alcoholism, or autism. Here we probe this puzzle within a life-history adaptationist framework, focusing on the high prevalence of mood disorders among women with the goal to evaluate their adaptive rather than pathological qualities. First, we characterize gender disparities in mental health, particularly mood disorders among women, and review their phenomenology. Then we survey known risks for mood disorder on cultural, ecological, experiential, and physical/physiological dimensions. Next we consider adaptationist explanations for depression, and map women’s life history in non-industrial societies, plotting resources, demands, and selection pressures. Thence we turn to how life-course selection pressures and female adaptive responses to them operate and intersect, illustrated by an example of low birthweight effects. Affective disorders vary in phenotype and prevalence within and across societies and through time, arising from an array of context-sensitive cost–benefit trade-offs for females that operate from birth onwards. Available evidence suggests that the general preponderance of mood disorder among females is adaptive overall albeit via multiple pathways.

Information

Type
Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that no alterations are made and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press or the rights holder(s) must be obtained prior to any commercial use and/or adaptation of the article.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.
Figure 0

Table 1. Prevalence of prominent conditions and their health impact in 2019, by gender. (Source: GBD 2021 Mental Disorders Collaborators, 2022)

Figure 1

Table 2. Ubiquitous and major features of depression: global, non-Western, female, and male (source: Haroz et al., 2017)

Figure 2

Table 3. Conditions contributing to mood disorder

Figure 3

Figure 1. Schematic timeline of women’s life history in pre-industrial societies.

Figure 4

Table 4. Selection pressures from risk factors for mood disorder across the life course

Figure 5

Figure 2. Birthweight, adversity, and depression in girls in the longitudinal Great Smoky Mountains Study, controlling for family psychiatric history. The horizontal arrow indicates marked change in sensitivity to adverse experiences, whereas the vertical arrow illustrates shifts along the reaction norm reflecting the presumed phenotypic responses to adversity that differentiate low from normal birth weight conditions. Birthweight: low ; normal (Costello et al., 2007).