Chapter preview

In Chapter 2 the distinction between risk assessment and risk perception is described, and the reasons why both should be understood are considered. In risk assessment, the relationship between risk estimation and risk evaluation is examined. The principles that underlie techniques for risk assessment are outlined and the way they are used in relation to different sorts of hazards are illustrated. It is emphasised that good risk assessment is dependent upon having good information about the hazard, its potential impacts, and the measures that could be used to control both the hazard and its effects. The chapter describes how risk can be expressed (for example, in terms of various measures of fatality, in terms of frequency of occurrence and in terms of tolerability). The psychometric paradigm for the analysis of risk perception is presented and the dimensions along which risks can be characterised are outlined. Research on the tolerability and acceptability of risk is described. The difficulties of comparing risks are explored in the context of methods used to determine the appropriateness of different regimes for allocating limited resources to remediate the hazards. The concept of synergistic risks is introduced. The various criticisms of the psychometric paradigm are summarised.

Distinguishing between risk assessment and risk perception

Complexities emerge when asking people to adopt a shared definition of risk, because in relation to many of the most important hazards there is great uncertainty about how risk can be assessed (the appropriateness and reliability of methods) and how it might be recorded (the language of risk, the measurements of risk).