Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-r6c6k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-10T21:06:07.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geodynamic evolution of Upper Cretaceous Zagros ophiolites: formation of oceanic lithosphere above a nascent subduction zone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2011

HADI SHAFAII MOGHADAM*
Affiliation:
School of Earth Sciences, Damghan University, Damghan, Iran
ROBERT J. STERN
Affiliation:
Geosciences Dept., University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75083-0688, USA
*
Author for correspondence: hadishafaii@du.ac.ir; hadishafaii@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Zagros fold-and-thrust belt of SW Iran is a young continental convergence zone, extending NW–SE from eastern Turkey through northern Iraq and the length of Iran to the Strait of Hormuz and into northern Oman. This belt reflects the shortening and off-scraping of thick sediments from the northern margin of the Arabian platform, essentially behaving as the accretionary prism for the Iranian convergent margin. Distribution of Upper Cretaceous ophiolites in the Zagros orogenic belt defines the northern limit of the evolving suture between Arabia and Eurasia and comprises two parallel belts: (1) Outer Zagros Ophiolitic Belt (OB) and (2) Inner Zagros Ophiolitic Belt (IB). These belts contain complete (if disrupted) ophiolites with well-preserved mantle and crustal sequences. Mantle sequences include tectonized harzburgite and rare ultramafic–mafic cumulates as well as isotropic gabbro lenses and isolated dykes within the harzburgite. Crustal sequences include rare gabbros (mostly in IB ophiolites), sheeted dyke complexes, pillowed lavas and felsic rocks. All Zagros ophiolites are overlain by Upper Cretaceous pelagic limestone. Limited radiometric dating indicates that the OB and IB formed at the same time during Late Cretaceous time. IB and OB components show strong suprasubduction zone affinities, from mantle harzburgite to lavas. This is shown by low whole-rock Al2O3 and CaO contents and spinel and orthopyroxene compositions of mantle peridotites as well as by the abundance of felsic rocks and the trace element characteristics of the lavas. Similarly ages, suprasubduction zone affinities and fore-arc setting suggest that the IB and OB once defined a single tract of fore-arc lithosphere that was disrupted by exhumation of subducted Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone metamorphic rocks. Our data for the OB and IB along with better-studied ophiolites in Cyprus, Turkey and Oman compel the conclusion that a broad and continuous tract of fore-arc lithosphere was created during Late Cretaceous time as the magmatic expression of a newly formed subduction zone developed along the SW margin of Eurasia.

Information

Type
THE ZAGROS OPHIOLITES
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
Figure 0

Figure 1. Location of the Zagros Ophiolitic Belt as part of the 3000 km long Upper Cretaceous ophiolite belt of SW Asia between Cyprus and Oman (modified after Blome & Irwin, 1985).

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) Map showing the distribution of the inner (Nain–Dehshir–Baft–Shahr-e-Babak) and outer (Kermanshah–Neyriz–Haji–Abad) Zagros ophiolitic belts, the location of the Urumieh–Dokhtar magmatic arc (Eocene–Quaternary), and Main Zagros Thrust (MZT). (b) Schematic cross-section showing the relationship between the outer and the inner Zagros ophiolitic belts and the Zagros thrust–fold belt (after Shafaii Moghadam, Stern & Rahgoshay, 2010). Note that the Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone is shown as exhumed subducted material, as discussed in the text.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Field photographs of Zagros outer belt ophiolites (approximate positions shown in Fig. A10 in online Appendix 1 at http://journals.cambridge.org/geo). (a) Pillow lava sequence of the Kherran to Sartakht section (Kermanshah ophiolite). (b) Sheeted dyke complex in the Kherran to Sartakht section (Kermanshah ophiolite). Late felsic dykes injected into early mafic dykes. (c) Close-up view of contact between dykes in sheeted dyke complex (Kermanshah ophiolite). (d) Upper Cretaceous pillow lava sequence near Siah-Pareh village (section C of Fig. A10 in online Appendix 1 at http://journals.cambridge.org/geo) (Kermanshah ophiolite). (e) Close-up view of fragmented pillow lavas in Dowlat-Abad, Neyriz ophiolite. (f) Tale-Afshari sheeted dyke complex in the Neyriz ophiolite. Late felsic dyke injected into early mafic dyke. (g) Upper Cretaceous boninitic pillow lavas near Avenan village, Haji–Abad ophiolite. (h) Calc-alkaline pillow lavas with intercalation of Upper Cretaceous pelagic limestones near Chale-Mort village (Haji–Abad ophiolite).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Field photographs of Zagros inner belt ophiolites (approximate positions shown in Fig. A11 in online Appendix 1 at http://journals.cambridge.org/geo). (a) Early rodingitized gabbroic sill in mantle harzburgite of the Nain ophiolite. (b) Injection of diabasic dyke into amphibole gabbros, host of the Nain ophiolite sheeted dyke complex. (c) Isolated diabasic dyke in mantle sequence of the Dehshir ophiolite. (d) Late dacitic dykes injected into early diabasic dykes in the Dehshir ophiolite sheeted dyke complex. (e) Rhyolitic dyke injected into volcanic sequence of the Shahr-e-Babak ophiolite. (f) Interbedded andesitic lavas with Upper Cretaceous radiolarites in the Shahr-e-Babak ophiolite. (g) Basaltic sill within pyroclastic rocks of the Balvard–Baft ophiolite. (h) Pyroclastic unit of the Balvard–Baft ophiolite overlain by Upper Cretaceous pelagic limestones.

Figure 4

Table 1. Summary of outer and inner Zagros ophiolitic belt characteristics

Figure 5

Figure 5. Histograms of wt% SiO2 (recalculated 100% anhydrous) for Zagros ophiolite lavas and dykes from sheeted dyke complex. Highly altered samples with high LOI content are not plotted. Most samples have 50–56 wt% SiO2 but there is a significant proportion of samples with > 60 wt% SiO2.

Figure 6

Figure 6. FeOt/MgO v. SiO2 (volatile free, normalized to 100% total) for Zagros OB and IB magmatic rocks. Boundaries between tholeiitic and calc-alkaline suites (thin solid line) and between low-, medium- and high-Fe suites (thick, dashed lines) are from Miyashiro (1974) and Arculus (2003), respectively. For comparison compositional fields from the Kizildag ophiolite, Turkey (Dilek & Thy, 2009), Oman (Godard, Dautria & Perrin, 2003) and IBM fore-arc lavas (Reagan et al. 2010) are shown.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Major element variations (TiO2 v. MgO) of OB and IB mafic rocks and comparisons to Troodos upper and lower lavas (modified after Dilek & Thy, 2009). Troodos upper and lower lava fields are outlined by dashed and dotted lines, respectively.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Chondrite-normalized rare earth element patterns (chondrite abundances are from McDonough & Sun, 1995) and normal mid-ocean ridge basalt (N-MORB)-normalized multi-element patterns (N-MORB concentrations are from Sun & McDonough, 1989) for rock units of outer belt ophiolites. (a, b) Kermanshah ophiolite; (c, d) Neyriz ophiolite; and (e, f) Haji–Abad ophiolite.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Ti v. V diagram (after Shervais, 1982) for Zagros outer belt (a) and inner belt (b) ophiolites. For comparison, fields for the V1 (lower, Geotimes unit) and V2 (upper, Lasail unit) lavas of Oman ophiolite (data from Alabaster, Pearce & Malpas, 1982) and for Mariana fore-arc basalts and boninites (Reagan et al. 2010) are shown.

Figure 10

Figure 10. Chondrite-normalized rare earth element patterns (chondrite abundances are from McDonough & Sun, 1995) and normal mid-ocean ridge basalt (N-MORB)-normalized multi-element patterns (N-MORB concentrations are from Sun & McDonough, 1989) for rock units of inner belt ophiolites. (a, b) Nain ophiolite; (c, d) Dehshir ophiolite; (e, f) Shahr-e-Babak ophiolite; and (g, h) Balvard–Baft ophiolite.

Figure 11

Figure 11. Al2O3 v. CaO compositional plot (volatile free, normalized to 100% total) for Zagros inner and outer belt ophiolitic peridotites. Fields for abyssal and fore-arc peridotites are from Pearce et al. (1992). MARK peridotite data is from Casey (1997). Data for Oman ophiolite harzburgites (Godard, Jousselin & Bodinier, 2000; Girardeau et al. 2002) are shown for comparison. The composition of primitive upper mantle (PUM), fertile MORB mantle (FMM) and mantle residue after 5 to 25% partial melting are from Pearce & Parkinson (1993). Data for the Kermanshah ophiolite from Allahyari et al. (2010) are shown for comparison.

Figure 12

Figure 12. Composition of OB and IB harzburgite pyroxenes. (a) Orthopyroxene Al2O3 v. Mg no. composition diagram. Fields for abyssal peridotites (Johnson, Dick & Shimizu, 1990) and fore-arc peridotites (Ishii et al. 1992) are shown for comparison. (b) Clinopyroxene TiO2 against Al2O3 for OB and IB harzburgites. Comparative fields are shown for abyssal peridotites (abyssal peridotite 1: Hébert, Adamson & Komor, 1990; abyssal peridotite 2: Johnson, Dick & Shimizu, 1990) and fore-arc peridotites (Ishii et al. 1992). The long thin arrow shows changes expected for residual clinopyroxene due to progressive partial melting of peridotite. Short thick arrow shows compositional changes due to re-equilibration of Cpx with percolating melt. Izu–Bonin–Mariana (IBM) and South Sandwich fore-arc harzburgite data are from Parkinson & Pearce (1998) and Pearce et al. (2000), respectively; Mariana Trough (back-arc basin peridotite) data are from Ohara et al. (2002). For comparison we have also plotted data on the Kermanshah peridotite from Allahyari et al. (2010).

Figure 13

Figure 13. (a) Cr no. v. Mg no. diagram (modified after Dick & Bullen, 1984) for spinels in OB and IB harzburgites. (b) Diagram (after Tamura & Arai, 2005, 2006) showing TiO2 against Cr no. of spinels, in order to discriminate between various types of peridotites and links to boninite. Note that spinels plot in fields for both MORB peridotites and fore-arc peridotites. Some data show affinity to boninite. IBM and South Sandwich fore-arc harzburgite data are from Parkinson & Pearce (1998) and Pearce et al. (2000), respectively; Mariana Trough (back-arc basin) peridotite are from Ohara et al. (2002); Oman harzburgite data are from Le Mée, Girardeau & Monnier (2004) and Tamura & Arai (2006).

Figure 14

Figure 14. (a) Al2O3/TiO2 versus TiO2 and (b) Zr versus TiO2 variations for OB and IB magmatic rocks (modified after Bagci, Parlak & Hock, 2008). North Tonga boninites from Falloon & Crawford (1991); IBM fore-arc boninites from Arculus et al. (1992). (c) Th/Yb v. Nb/Yb diagram (after Leat et al. 2004) for OB and IB ophiolites. Most OB and IB mafic rocks have high Th/Yb and plot above the mantle array near the volcanic arc array, with some exceptions that are MORB-like. For comparison data from the Kizildag ophiolite, Turkey (Dilek & Thy, 2009), Oman lavas (Godard, Dautria & Perrin, 2003) and IBM fore-arc lavas (Reagan et al. 2010) are shown.

Figure 15

Figure 15. Nb/Yb v. Nb/La diagram to discriminate between arc-like and non-arc lavas and dykes in the Upper Cretaceous Zagros ophiolites. Nearly all samples (90%) indicate arc-like characteristics while only 10% of lavas have a tendency towards non-arc geochemical characteristics.

Figure 16

Figure 16. (a) Major element variations (TiO2 v. MgO) of mafic rocks of Upper Cretaceous Tethyan ophiolites from Troodos, Kizildag, Oman and Baer-Bassit (modified after Dilek & Thy, 2009). (b) Major element variations (TiO2 v. MgO) of Chichijima Island boninites (Ishizuka et al. 2006) and IBM fore-arc lavas (Reagan et al. 2010) are also shown for comparison. Troodos upper and lower lava fields are outlined by dashed and dotted lines, respectively.

Figure 17

Figure 17. Generation of the Upper Cretaceous Zagros ophiolites as a proto-fore-arc formed during subduction initiation, modified after Stern (2004). Left panels are sections perpendicular to the evolving plate boundary and right panels are map views. (a) and (b) show the initial (> 95 Ma) configuration. Two lithospheres of differing density (buoyant Eurasia, dense Tethys) are juxtaposed across a transform fault or fracture zone. (c, d) Old, dense lithosphere sinks asymmetrically, with maximum subsidence nearest the transform fault or fracture zone. Asthenosphere flows over the sinking lithosphere and propagates along the transform/fracture zone. Strong extension in the region above the sinking lithosphere leads to seafloor spreading, forming infant arc crust of the proto-fore-arc. This forms the Zagros ophiolites, ~ 93 Ma ago. (d) shows that this process is asynchronous along the margin; ophiolite ages indicate that subduction propagated from E (Oman) to W (Cyprus) between 95 and 90 Ma. (e, f) Beginning of down-dip motion of the lithosphere marks when true subduction starts (< 90 Ma). Strong extension in the fore-arc and trenchward migration of asthenosphere ends, cooling the sub-fore-arc mantle, which becomes lithosphere; further addition of water leads only to serpentinization. The locus of igneous activity retreats ~ 200 km away from the trench, to the region above where asthenospheric advection continues, forming the Urumieh–Dokhtar arc. This fore-arc today defines the Oman (Om), SW Iran (SI), and Cyprus (Cy) ophiolites. (g) A detailed view of how magmatism in the arc evolves with time: (1) infant arc crust of the fore-arc ophiolite forms by seafloor spreading during the first c. 5 Ma of subduction zone evolution; (2) retreat of magmatic activity away from the trench (Tr) during the second c. 5 Ma; (3) focusing of magmatic activity at the position of the active magmatic arc, resulting in crustal thickening and delamination.

Supplementary material: PDF

Moghadam Supplementary Appendix 1

Moghadam Supplementary Appendix 1

Download Moghadam Supplementary Appendix 1(PDF)
PDF 1.8 MB
Supplementary material: PDF

Moghadam Supplementary Appendix 2

Moghadam Supplementary Appendix 2

Download Moghadam Supplementary Appendix 2(PDF)
PDF 976.8 KB