Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-nlwjb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-13T05:57:38.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prevalence of fatigue in adults with congenital heart disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2021

Linda Ternrud
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Department of Clinical Science, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Joanna Hlebowicz*
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Department of Clinical Science, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Camilla Sandberg
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
Bengt Johansson
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden Department of Surgery and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
David Sparv
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Department of Clinical Science, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
*
Author for correspondence: J. Hlebowicz, Department of Cardiology, Skåne University Hospital, Entrégatan 7, 221 85 Lund, Sweden. Tel: +46 46 170000; Fax: + 46 46 137658. E-mail: joanna.hlebowicz@med.lu.se
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aims:

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to examine the prevalence of the multidimensional phenomenon of fatigue in adults with congenital heart disease.

Background:

Adults with congenital heart disease are a growing population, and patient-reported outcomes can provide valuable information about the patient’s experience of living with CHD. Fatigue is a multidimensional phenomenon that can be described as an overwhelming feeling of exhaustion with a reduced capacity of mental and physical work. Fatigue can be observed clinically in adults with congenital heart disease, but the actual prevalence is unknown.

Methods:

Fatigue was assessed by the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory which enables the respondent to report the presence of fatigue according to five dimensions: “general fatigue,” “physical fatigue,” “mental fatigue,” “reduced motivation,” and “reduced activity.” The questionnaire was sent to 463 patients in Lund and Umeå. Four groups with complex CHD and two groups with moderately complex CHD were included. The reliability (internal consistency) of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory was tested for all dimensions and groups of diagnosis.

Results:

The response rate was 56.6% (n= 262). In patients with complex CHD, 40.0–59.4% reported severe to very severe general fatigue, and patients with a single ventricle reported the highest prevalence (59.4%). Among patients with complex CHD, 29.2–40.0% reported severe to very severe mental fatigue. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory had a high reliability measured with Cronbach’s alpha.

Conclusions:

The study findings show a relatively high prevalence of fatigue in adults with congenital heart disease, and general fatigue was the most prevalent. Further studies are needed regarding fatigue and its causes and consequences in adults with congenital heart disease.

Relevance to clinical practice:

The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory proved to be an instrument with high reliability and low internal loss, which suggests that the instrument may be suitable to use as a patient-reported outcome in the care of adults with congenital heart disease, preferably at repeated occasions.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Included patients and response rate

Figure 1

Figure 1. Distribution of general fatigue scores in percent in all diagnostic groups. ASO: transposition of the great arteries operated with arterial switch; ccTGA: congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries; CoA: coarctatio aortae; TCPC: total cavopulmonary connection; ToF: tetralogy of Fallot.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Distribution of physical fatigue scores in percent in all diagnostic groups. ASO: transposition of the great arteries operated with arterial switch; ccTGA: congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries; CoA: coarctatio aortae; TCPC: total cavopulmonary connection; ToF: tetralogy of Fallot.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Distribution of mental fatigue scores in percent in all diagnostic groups. ASO: transposition of the great arteries operated with arterial switch; ccTGA: congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries; CoA: coarctatio aortae; TCPC: total cavopulmonary connection; ToF: tetralogy of Fallot.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Distribution of reduced motivation scores in percent in all diagnostic groups. ASO: transposition of the great arteries operated with arterial switch; ccTGA: congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries; CoA: coarctatio aortae; TCPC: total cavopulmonary connection; ToF: tetralogy of Fallot.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Distribution of reduced activity scores in percent in all diagnostic groups. ASO: transposition of the great arteries operated with arterial switch; ccTGA: congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries; CoA: coarctatio aortae; TCPC: total cavopulmonary connection; ToF: tetralogy of Fallot.

Figure 6

Table 2. Fatigue score for each dimension and diagnostic group with test of significance

Figure 7

Table 3. Internal consistency measured with Cronbach’s alpha