Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-nf276 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-18T10:19:56.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) and investigations of the ice–ocean interface in Antarctic and Arctic waters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2017

J.A. Dowdeswell
Affiliation:
Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1ER, UK E-mail: jd16@cam.ac.uk
J. Evans
Affiliation:
Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1ER, UK E-mail: jd16@cam.ac.uk
R. Mugford
Affiliation:
Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1ER, UK E-mail: jd16@cam.ac.uk
G. Griffiths
Affiliation:
National Marine Facilities, National Oceanography Centre, Universtiy of Southampton, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK
S. McPhail
Affiliation:
National Marine Facilities, National Oceanography Centre, Universtiy of Southampton, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK
N. Millard
Affiliation:
National Marine Facilities, National Oceanography Centre, Universtiy of Southampton, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK
P. Stevenson
Affiliation:
National Marine Facilities, National Oceanography Centre, Universtiy of Southampton, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK
M.A. Brandon
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK
C. Banks
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK
K.J. Heywood
Affiliation:
School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
M.R. Price
Affiliation:
School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
P.A. Dodd
Affiliation:
School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
A. Jenkins
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environmental Research Council, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
K.W. Nicholls
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environmental Research Council, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
D. Hayes
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environmental Research Council, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
E.P. Abrahamsen
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environmental Research Council, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK
P. Tyler
Affiliation:
Deep-Sea Biology Group, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK
B. Bett
Affiliation:
Deep-Sea Biology Group, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK
D. Jones
Affiliation:
Deep-Sea Biology Group, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK
P. Wadhams
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK Laboratoire d’Océanographie de Villefranche, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, UMR 7093, BP 28, 06234 Villefranche-sur-Mer Cedex, France
J.P. Wilkinson
Affiliation:
Scottish Association for Marine Science, Dunstaffnage Marine Laboratory, Dunbeg, Oban, Argyll PA37 1QA, UK
K. Stansfield
Affiliation:
Ocean Observing and Climate Group, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK
S. Ackley
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78249, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Limitations of access have long restricted exploration and investigation of the cavities beneath ice shelves to a small number of drillholes. Studies of sea-ice underwater morphology are limited largely to scientific utilization of submarines. Remotely operated vehicles, tethered to a mother ship by umbilical cable, have been deployed to investigate tidewater-glacier and ice-shelf margins, but their range is often restricted. The development of free-flying autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) with ranges of tens to hundreds of kilometres enables extensive missions to take place beneath sea ice and floating ice shelves. Autosub2 is a 3600 kg, 6.7 m long AUV, with a 1600 m operating depth and range of 400 km, based on the earlier Autosub1 which had a 500 m depth limit. A single direct-drive d.c. motor and five-bladed propeller produce speeds of 1–2 m s−1. Rear-mounted rudder and stern-plane control yaw, pitch and depth. The vehicle has three sections. The front and rear sections are free-flooding, built around aluminium extrusion space-frames covered with glass-fibre reinforced plastic panels. The central section has a set of carbon-fibre reinforced plastic pressure vessels. Four tubes contain batteries powering the vehicle. The other three house vehicle-control systems and sensors. The rear section houses subsystems for navigation, control actuation and propulsion and scientific sensors (e.g. digital camera, upward-looking 300 kHz acoustic Doppler current profiler, 200 kHz multibeam receiver). The front section contains forward-looking collision sensor, emergency abort, the homing systems, Argos satellite data and location transmitters and flashing lights for relocation as well as science sensors (e.g. twin conductivity–temperature–depth instruments, multibeam transmitter, sub-bottom profiler, AquaLab water sampler). Payload restrictions mean that a subset of scientific instruments is actually in place on any given dive. The scientific instruments carried on Autosub are described and examples of observational data collected from each sensor in Arctic or Antarctic waters are given (e.g. of roughness at the underside of floating ice shelves and sea ice).

Information

Type
Instruments and Methods
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 2008
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) The Autosub AUV being deployed in Courtauld Fjord, East Greenland, from RRS James Clark Ross. Autosub is 6.7 m long. Photograph by J.A. Dowdeswell. (b) The major systems of Autosub2 and the science sensors that were installed for the Autosub polar missions of 2003–05. The vehicle displaced 3.6 t and had a range of 400 km at 1.7 m s−1 with the payload of sensors shown.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Plan view of collision-avoidance behaviour, triggered by detection of a 30 m deep iceberg keel ahead on mission 365 off northeast Greenland (Wadhams and others, 2006). It took three attempts for Autosub to avoid the hazard and continue eastwards on its programmed course. Axes are in decimal degrees north and west.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Autosub surfacing in light sea-ice cover. Note the possibility of damage to antennae protruding from the vehicle.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. The AquaLab water sampler located in the nose of the Autosub vehicle. Individual water-sample bags are visible. Photograph by P. Dodd.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. (a) Multibeam data from mission 382 beneath Fimbul Ice Shelf, East Antarctica, showing ice-shelf draft (m), the track starting beneath the ice shelf (0 km) and ending at the ice front (26 km). (b) 3-D rendering of swath-bathymetric data, showing a portion of the ice base below a flow trace at 20 km, including the smooth base either side of the feature (from Nicholls and others, 2006).

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Examples of EM-2000 swath-bathymetric images of the under surface of sea ice offshore of northeast Greenland. The perspective views are illuminated by a sun elevation of 20°. (a) An embedded multi-year floe with a 33 m deep sea-ice ridge. The floe is surrounded by undeformed shorefast sea ice. (b) A multi-year ridged floe of draft 3–5 m, embedded in undeformed shorefast ice of draft 1.8 m. Fast ice shows a pattern of depressions due to mirroring of surface melt pools. The floe contains a pressure ridge of maximum draft 11 m, which has partly disintegrated into individual ice blocks of diameter 5–20 m (from Wadhams and others, 2006).

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Oceanographic data from mission 382 obtained beneath Fimbul Ice Shelf, Antarctica. (a) Mission trajectory (red and blue lines indicate the outward and return Autosub legs, respectively). The vertical dashed line at 26.5 km gives the position of the ice front, referenced to the turning point in the mission; the horizontal dashed line at 570 m depth shows the depth of a nearby sill at the continental-shelf break. Also shown are the ADCP data illustrating the dramatically reduced range beneath the ice shelf that implies a dearth of appropriately sized scatterers in the water column. The upward-looking instrument operated at 300 kHz and the downward-looking instrument at 150 kHz. The data are for the north– south velocity component (positive northward, approximately perpendicular to the ice front), which have been averaged using a horizontal window 100 m wide. The inset shows the ADCP data in the vicinity of the ice front for the outward leg. (b) Vertically averaged ADCP currents after subtraction of the modelled tide. (c) Salinity (bold) and potential temperature (θ). The thin green near-horizontal dashed line is the freezing point of the water at surface pressure for salinities measured on the outward journey (from Nicholls and others, 2006).

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Cross-section of the current velocity (colour scale in m s−1) into and out of the mouth of Kangerdlussuaq Fjord, East Greenland, acquired from the upward- and downward-looking ADCPs mounted on Autosub. The Autosub navigated horizontal paths at 70, 190 and 400 m (marked as black lines), descending or rising in between, taking 6 hours to complete the survey. Positive values denote water flowing into the fjord; negative values indicate water flowing out of the fjord. Southwest is to the left and northeast to the right.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Sea-ice velocity from Autosub mission 324. The upward-looking ADCP measured the surface track velocity upon (a) entering the ice pack at 90 m and (b) exiting the ice pack at 90 m. The magnified inset shows a typical segment analyzed here. Note the strong periodicity in both components, as well as mean current towards the southeast (modified from Hayes and others, 2007).

Figure 9

Fig. 10. (a) Mean wave period and (b) significant wave height for Autosub missions 322–324. The label ‘in’ refers to the series collected upon entering the ice pack, while ‘back’ refers to the return series. Period and wave height are derived from the one-dimensional wave spectrum of 512 s blocks (with the exception of the return trip in mission 323 in which 256 s blocks were analyzed).

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Multibeam echo-sounder image of the glacially streamlined sea floor of Kangerdlussuaq Fjord, acquired from a 200 kHz swathbathymetry system mounted on Autosub. The swath width is approximately 200 m. Water depth is 710–840 m. The swathbathymetry data are gridded at a resolution of 1 m in the horizontal. The lower panels show acoustically stratified sediments on the fjord floor, acquired from the chirp 2–16 kHz sub-bottom profiler on Autosub. The acoustic profile is located in the multibeam image.

Figure 11

Fig. 12. Example photograph from Autosub mission 377, showing the floor of outer Kangerdlussuaq Fjord (imaged from an altitude of 9 m at a depth of 564 m). One cobble-sized iceberg-rafted drop-stone, three large burrows and numerous tubeworms are visible. The photograph is about 1 m across.