Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-pjp64 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-30T19:34:05.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oligocene-Miocene uplift and denudation of the Afro-Arabian dome inferred from weathering geochemistry of Levant Basin sediments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2026

Adar Glazer*
Affiliation:
Institute of Earth Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
Dov Avigad
Affiliation:
Institute of Earth Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
Navot Morag
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Israel, Israel
*
Corresponding author: Adar Glazer; Email: adar.glazer@mail.huji.ac.il
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Afro-Arabian dome is a broad (4000 × 1500 km) topographic swell extending from Ethiopia to the Eastern Mediterranean, initiated by Late Eocene epeirogeny associated with the Afar plume and further shaped by Oligo-Miocene rifting of the Red Sea. Here, we evaluate stages in the uplift history of Afro-Arabia by analysing the mineralogical and geochemical properties of Oligocene-Miocene sediments from the Levant Basin of the Eastern Mediterranean. Our findings show that the 3-km-thick siliciclastic section in the basin preserves a unique record of the regional-scale uplift in Afro-Arabia, revealing a three-stage evolution: (1) Oligocene sediments (∼33–25 Ma) exhibit extreme weathering signatures reflecting deep chemical alteration of Neoproterozoic basement rocks of the Arabian-Nubian Shield. These sediments record the erosion of widespread Late Cretaceous-Late Eocene etchplains that blanketed the region and were dismantled during early stages of mantle-driven domal uplift; (2) A major transition occurred in the Late Oligocene-Early Miocene (∼25–20 Ma) when sedimentation rates peaked, sediment weathering intensity declined and recycling intensified, reflecting more vigorous erosion as uplift accelerated along the emerging Red Sea Rift shoulders; (3) Since ∼20 Ma, sediments show reduced weathering intensity, reflecting incision through the residual weathering mantle into fresh basement and marking the development of a rugged, high-relief landscape. Together, this record documents a stepwise transition from a deeply weathered, low-relief surface to a high-relief topography, shaped by the combined effects of regional doming and flexural uplift along the Red Sea Rift margins. It provides independent sedimentary constraints on the timing and style of Oligocene-Miocene uplift of Afro-Arabia.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Regional topography, lithologic domains and tectonic framework of Afro-Arabia. (a) Distribution of lateritic cover across Africa, highlighting major Cenozoic domal swells (Afro-Arabian, East African and South African domes) and principal river systems (modified from Chardon (2023)). (b) Simplified stratigraphic column of the Ethiopian-Yemen Plateau illustrating Oligocene continental flood basalts (∼30 Ma) overlying lateritic profiles and older sedimentary and Neoproterozoic basement units. (c) Major lithologic domains of northeast Africa and Arabia. The dashed outline delineates the extent of the Afro-Arabian dome. Also shown are the Oligocene-Miocene sediment transport pathways toward the Levant Basin: the Nile River system from the south (Fielding et al.2018) and the now extinct ‘Hazeva’ fluvial system from the southeast (Zilberman and Calvo, 2013; Morag et al.2021). Topography is from the GEBCO 2023 Grid DTM (GEBCO Compilation Group, 2023). BZOB, Bitlis-Zagros orogenic belt; DST, Dead Sea Transform.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Location map and borehole stratigraphy of the study area. (a) Tectonic framework of the Levant region showing the Levant Basin and positions of the Myra, Dolphin, Leviathan and Karish North boreholes. (b) Simplified lithostratigraphic columns for the three boreholes (after Glazer et al.2024), showing the investigated Oligocene-Miocene siliciclastic section. Symbols denote sampling intervals, colour-coded by age. S.B., seabed; T.D., total depth.

Figure 2

Table 1. Mineralogy and geochemistry of Oligocene-Miocene clay fractions (<2 μm) from the Levant Basin

Figure 3

Figure 3. Clay and silt fractions mineralogical and geochemical ternary plots. (a) Clay fraction plotted in the illite-smectite – illite+chlorite – kaolinite ternary system. (b) Clay fraction plotted in the A-CN-K ternary system. (c) Silt fraction plotted in the A-CN-K ternary system (data from Torfstein and Steinberg (2020). Together, these plots illustrate a progressive shift from kaolinite-rich, high-CIA end-members toward illite-smectite-rich, low-CIA compositions, reflecting decreasing chemical weathering intensity during the Oligocene-Miocene. Lower Miocene samples show an increase in illite content, consistent with enhanced sediment recycling. Comparative data from Krom et al. (1999); Sandler and Herut (2000); Deller (2012); Garzanti et al. (2015).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Major, trace and rare earth element compositions of clay-fraction samples from the Myra, Leviathan and Karish North boreholes. (a) Major and trace element content normalized according to the average upper continental crust composition of Rudnick et al. (2003). (b) Rare earth elements content normalized according to the chondritic composition of Taylor and McLennan (1985). Together, these signatures indicate derivation from a predominantly felsic upper-crustal source, likely the Neoproterozoic Arabian-Nubian Shield. Comparative data from Kessel et al. (1998); Moghazi et al. (1998); Pik et al. (1999); Eyal et al. (2004); Padoan et al. (2011);Garzanti et al. (2015); El-Bialy and Omar (2015); Fielding et al. (2017). ANS, Arabian-Nubian Shield; UCC, upper continental crust.

Figure 5

Figure 5. αAl-normalized element ratios for the clay (a) and silt (b) fractions plotted against sample age, showing differential depletion in alkali and alkaline-earth metals (silt-fraction data calculated after Torfstein and Steinberg (2020). Oligocene sediments exhibit a strong depletion in mobile elements, indicating intense weathering of the source rocks. A shift toward less depleted compositions during the Miocene indicates a reduction in chemical weathering intensity and an increasing contribution from less-altered source material.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Temporal evolution of sedimentary, geochemical and isotopic indicators for the clay (a) and silt (b) fractions, including weathering indices and sediment-recycling proxies (silt-fraction data calculated after Torfstein and Steinberg (2020). Oligocene sediments record intense chemical weathering, expressed by high CIA/CIX values, low WIP and low CaO+Na2O/Al2O3 ratios. Through the Miocene, the record shows a gradual shift toward less-weathered compositions. The Early Miocene is marked by elevated recycling indicators, reflecting increased incorporation of quartz-rich material. Shaded intervals highlight the period of enhanced sediment recycling. ϵNd data from Glazer et al. (2024).

Figure 7

Table 2. Geochemistry of Oligocene-Miocene silt fractions (<63 μm) from the Leviathan borehole

Figure 8

Figure 7. CIA/CIX-WIP relationships for (a) clay and (b) silt fractions (silt-fraction data calculated after Torfstein and Steinberg (2020). Arrows indicate compositional trajectories associated with increasing chemical weathering of UCC rocks and quartz enrichment. Both clay and silt fractions show a negative correlation between CIA/CIX and WIP, reflecting decreasing chemical weathering from the Oligocene to the Late Miocene. Early Miocene silt samples deviate toward lower WIP and greater quartz enrichment, consistent with enhanced sediment recycling.

Figure 9

Figure 8. Temporal variation in CIA/WIP for clay and silt fractions from the Leviathan borehole. Both fractions show a gradual decrease in CIA/WIP through time, reflecting a shift toward less-weathered source compositions. Elevated CIA/WIP values in the silt fraction between ∼24-20 Ma record a phase of pronounced sediment recycling and increased incorporation of quartz-rich material.

Figure 10

Figure 9. Conceptual model for the evolution of topography, weathering, erosion and sediment supply from the Afro-Arabian dome to the Levant Basin. (a) Late Cretaceous-Late Eocene warm, humid conditions produced a thick weathering mantle. (b) Late Eocene-Oligocene domal uplift initiated stripping of this mantle, delivering intensely weathered sediment to the Levant Basin. (c) Early Miocene uplift of the Red Sea Rift flanks enhanced erosion and sediment recycling. Thereafter, erosion penetrated into the Neoproterozoic basement, supplying less-weathered sediment and marking the development of a rugged, high-relief landscape. Present-day elevations along the African Red Sea Rift flank range from ∼400 to ∼2000 m, whereas the main Nile flows at ∼30 to 350 m above sea level.

Figure 11

Figure 10. Representative sedimentary indicators from the Levant Basin (present study) compared with thermochronological data from around the Red Sea (Boone et al.2025). The Oligocene interval exhibits the most intensely weathered compositions, reflecting the stripping of a weathering mantle that developed from the Late Cretaceous to the Late Eocene, before the onset of domal uplift. The Early Miocene is characterized by a pronounced peak in recycling indicators (high CIX/WIP) and elevated sedimentation rates, marking a phase of vigorous erosion associated with uplift of the Red Sea Rift flanks. Following this interval, weathering intensity significantly declines, indicating that erosion had penetrated through the weathering mantle into the underlying Neoproterozoic basement, signalling the development of a rugged, high-relief topography.

Supplementary material: File

Glazer et al. supplementary material 1

Glazer et al. supplementary material
Download Glazer et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 14.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Glazer et al. supplementary material 2

Glazer et al. supplementary material
Download Glazer et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 101 KB