Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-mblfh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-26T12:07:25.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Groundwater–rock interactions in crystalline rocks: evidence from SIMS oxygen isotope data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2023

Bruce W.D. Yardley*
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Antoni E. Milodowski
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Environmental Science Centre, Nicker Hill, Keyworth, Nottingham, UK
Lorraine P. Field
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Environmental Science Centre, Nicker Hill, Keyworth, Nottingham, UK
Roy A. Wogelius
Affiliation:
School of Earth, Atmospheric, and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
Richard Metcalfe
Affiliation:
Quintessa Limited, Videcom House, Newtown Road, Henley-on-Thames, Oxfordshire, UK
Simon Norris
Affiliation:
Nuclear Waste Services, Building 329, West, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, UK
*
Corresponding author: Bruce W.D. Yardley; Email: b.w.d.yardley@leeds.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The diffusive exchange of dissolved material between fluid flowing in a fracture and the enclosing wallrocks (rock matrix diffusion) has been proposed as a mechanism by which radionuclides derived from a radioactive waste repository may be removed from groundwater and incorporated into the geosphere. To test the effectiveness of diffusive exchange in igneous and metamorphic rocks, we have carried out an investigation of veins formed at low temperatures (<100°C), comparing the oxygen isotopic composition of vein calcite with that of secondary calcite in the wallrocks. Two examples of veins from the Borrowdale Volcanic Group, Cumbria, and one from the Mountsorrel Granodiorite, Leicestershire, UK, have remarkably similar vein calcite compositions, ca. +20‰(SMOW) or greater, substantially heavier than the probable compositions of the host rocks, and these vein calcite compositions are inferred to reflect the infiltrating fluid and the temperature of vein formation. Calcites from the wallrocks are similar to those in veins, with little evidence for exchange with the wallrocks. The results support existing models for this type of vein which suggest low-temperature growth from formation brines originally linked to Permian or Triassic evaporites. The results are consistent with flow through fractures being attenuated through a damage zone adjacent to the fracture and provide no evidence of diffusional exchange with pore waters from wallrocks.

Information

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Crown Copyright - Nuclear Waste Services 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of the United Kingdom and Ireland
Figure 0

Figure 1. Alternative models for interaction between fluid flowing in a fracture and surrounding igneous or metamorphic wallrock. (a) Rock Matrix Diffusion model based on Baker et al. (2002); the wallrocks are assumed to be water saturated throughout, permitting diffusive exchange between wallrock pores and fracture fluid. (b) Fracture Damage Zone model simplified from Metcalfe et al. (2021). Water flows through microcracks and pores in a damage zone around the main fracture, as well as in the fracture itself. Alteration reactions in the damage zone create secondary porosity and permit enhanced diffusion, however there is an abrupt transition from the altered damage zone to unaltered wallrock with little evidence for the introduction of water.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Samples of late-formed (ME 6) carbonate veins with hematitic altered margins, cutting metavolcanic Borrowdale Volcanic Group host rocks (see Figs 4 and 5 for further detail). (a) Sample NSF-9A showing several carbonate–hematite mineralised fractures. This includes a prominent steeply-inclined vein (feature 57/12) with a red hematitic margin, partially mineralised by a fill of calcite and dolomite. One end of the core sample is defined by an open fracture (feature 57/11), which is patchily coated by dolomite and displays a prominent reddened wallrock alteration zone. (b) Section across core sample NSF-9A showing narrow reddened wallrock alteration zones adjacent to fracture features 57/11 and 57/12. (c) Sample RCF-1 showing thin carbonate–hematite vein displaying narrow reddened zones of wallrock alteration. The centre of the vein (upper image) is locally mineralised by coarser calcite (stained pink by Alizarin Red-S dye). The vein margins comprise finely laminated hematite and calcite (lower image). The ‘Feature’ numbers refer to specific fractures recorded in the original UK Nirex Limited borehole core logs.

Figure 2

Figure 3. BSE images of a late-stage carbonate – K-feldspar vein in Mountsorrel Granodiorite (Sample MSG-1). (a) Overview with the vein forming the upper edge of the field of view, and primary minerals (‘1ry’) dominant in the wallrock except where the calcic core of a large plagioclase grain (plag) has been intersected by the vein resulting in extensive alteration to secondary (‘2ry’) products. Yellow boxes denote the areas shown in b and c. (b) Detail of the edge of the altered plagioclase shown in a, the outer albite (ab) rim of the plagioclase is unaltered but internally the plagioclase is replaced by secondary K-feldspar (K-fsp) and dark-grey clay minerals. Black areas are holes and include small secondary pores with the clay and larger holes formed by plucking during preparation. (c) Detail of the vein and its margin. The constituent minerals are calcite (cte, lightest grey), dolomite (dol, darkest grey) and K-feldspar. These are intergrown throughout the vein; K-feldspar also mantles the contact with original plagioclase.

Figure 3

Figure 4. BSE image of the altered margin of intersecting carbonate veins (below and left), Sample NSF-9A. Fine white grains are the iron oxides that cause reddening of the vein margin (see Fig. 2a). White circles are sites of individual ion probe analyses of calcite; the associated numbers are the values of δ18O determined at each spot.

Figure 4

Figure 5. BSE image of a coarse patch in the analysed carbonate vein, Sample RCF-1 (Fig. 2b); the inset shows the same area reimaged after analysis. Iron oxide (Fe-oxide) grains are white, calcite (cte) is slightly lighter grey than dolomite (dol). Circles are sites of individual ion probe analyses of calcite; the associated numbers are the values of δ18O determined at each spot. Points shown in red are anomalously light values, probably due to contamination with iron oxide, which were rejected (see Supplementary Table S1). Inset shows the same area after analysis with the analysis pits. Note that this area is texturally identical to other parts of the vein which give significantly different values (see text).

Figure 5

Figure 6. BSE images of sample MSG-1 (Fig. 3) with examples of ion probe spot analyses of δ18O in calcite. (a) Calcite partially replacing plagioclase in wallrock close to the vein edge. Inset is a SEM image of the same area after analysis showing the ion probe pits. (b) Calcite–dolomite–K-feldspar vein with analyses of calcite from both sides of an altered wallrock fragment.

Figure 6

Table 1. Summary of ion probe oxygen-isotope analyses of vein and matrix calcite. Examples of individual analyses are shown in Figs 4–7 and the full data set is presented in Supplementary Table S1.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Matrix (circle) and vein (diamond) calcite oxygen compositions, summarised in Table 1 and included in Table S1. Each sample has two groups of vein analyses from different portions of the vein.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Oxygen isotope fractionation between calcite and water, from the data compilation of Vho et al. (2019).

Supplementary material: File

Yardley et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Yardley et al. supplementary material(File)
File 35.3 KB