Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-7zcd7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T20:40:36.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FROM THE EDITORS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2022

A J Timothy Jull  and
Kimberley Elliott
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information

Type
Editorial
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 64 , Issue 3: Seven Decades of Radiocarbon Dating: Remembering the Pioneers & Looking Towards the Future. Part 1 of 2 , June 2022 , pp. 415 - 417
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press for the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona

The Radiocarbon community has sadly lost a number of highly esteemed colleagues in recent years. To commemorate the contributions of these researchers, we set out to prepare a memorial issue. We met virtually several times with our associate editors during 2020–2021 to discuss the content and scope of this collection. During these discussions, the project grew to include retrospective articles about the early years of radiocarbon dating, as well as contributions about radiocarbon’s ever-widening range of applications and their most recent developments.

We are proud to present part 1 of the collection in this issue of Radiocarbon (part 2 will be published in the next issue) as we enter our sixty-fourth year of continuous publication. We honor and appreciate our radiocarbon colleagues, past and present, and thank the authors for their submissions. We are especially grateful for the close collaboration of our associate editors during the preparation of these special issues.

We acknowledge with regret that given the seventy-plus years of radiocarbon history, it would not be possible for us to compile all the memorials and histories in one or even two issues. Therefore, we encourage the submission of additional historical/memorial contributions.

Figure 1

Attendees of the 13th International Radiocarbon Conference, Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia, 1988. See Ines Krajcar Bronić’s memorial article about Dušan Srdoč in this issue for details. (Photo provided by Ines Krajcar Bronić.)

Figure 2

Participants of the 5th AMS Conference, Paris, 1990. Many famous names in radiocarbon were in attendance and are remembered in this collection as well as in past issues of Radiocarbon. (Photo provided by A. J. T. Jull.)

Figure 3

(a) Calib 1987 program disk and (b) Calib 4.1 program diskette. See the article “Evolution of Radiocarbon Calibration” by Paula J Reimer in this issue for details about the history of the calibration program.

At the end of this brief introductory section, we have included a recommended reading list of historical articles. The list is not comprehensive but could serve as a good starting place for readers looking for some background on the radiocarbon method and its evolution.

References

REFERENCES

Arnold, JR, Libby, WF. 1951. Radiocarbon dates. Science 113:111–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broecker, WS, Olson, EA. 1959. Lamont radiocarbon measurements VI. American Journal of Science Radiocarbon Supplement 1:111–132.Google Scholar
de Messières, N. 2001. Libby and the interdisciplinary aspect of radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 43(1):1–5. doi: 10.1017/S003382220003157X (and references therein).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gove, HE. 1996. The Shroud of Turin: relic, icon or hoax? Bristol: Institute of Physics Publishing.Google Scholar
Gove, HE. 2000. Some comments on accelerator mass spectrometry. Radiocarbon 42(1): 127–135. doi: 10.1017/S0033822200053091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jull, AJT. 2009. Preface from the editor. 50th anniversary issue. Radiocarbon 51(1):v. doi: 10.1017/S0033822200033683.Google Scholar
Olson, EA, Broecker, WS. 1959. Lamont radiocarbon measurements V. American Journal of Science Radiocarbon Supplement 1:1–28.Google Scholar
Radiocarbon. 2000. A tribute to Renee Kra: Radiocarbon Managing Editor for 30 years. (Part of a special retrospective issue.) Radiocarbon 42 (1). Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/radiocarbon/issue/543DAF7B3A748CF82AB9F400A0E15459.Google Scholar
Scott, EM, Harkness, DD. 2000. What future for radiocarbon? Radiocarbon 42 (1):173–178. doi: 10.1017/S0033822200053121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, RE. 2014. Passing of the last of the three who established 14C dating: a historical footnote. Radiocarbon 56 (3):913–921. doi: 10.2458/56.17978 (and references therein).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, RE, Bar-Yosef, O. 2014. Radiocarbon dating: an archaeological perspective. 2nd edition. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, RE, Long, A, Kra, RS, editors. 1992. Radiocarbon after four decades: an interdisciplinary perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1 Attendees of the 13th International Radiocarbon Conference, Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia, 1988. See Ines Krajcar Bronić’s memorial article about Dušan Srdoč in this issue for details. (Photo provided by Ines Krajcar Bronić.)

Figure 1

Figure 2 Participants of the 5th AMS Conference, Paris, 1990. Many famous names in radiocarbon were in attendance and are remembered in this collection as well as in past issues of Radiocarbon. (Photo provided by A. J. T. Jull.)

Figure 2

Figure 3 (a) Calib 1987 program disk and (b) Calib 4.1 program diskette. See the article “Evolution of Radiocarbon Calibration” by Paula J Reimer in this issue for details about the history of the calibration program.