Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-76mfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T21:46:40.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Heritage Learners’ versus Second Language Learners’ Source of Errors in Advanced-Level Writing: Case of a Persian Media Course

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Pouneh Shabani-Jadidi
Pouneh Shabani-Jadidi*
Affiliation:
McGill University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the acquisition particularities of advanced-level students. It also investigates the use of content-based—in this case media material—in teaching advanced-level students, as well as the impact of teaching such material on the students’ writing ability and overall proficiency. Finally, the subtle differences between heritage learners and second language learners are analyzed and discussed. Therefore, this research encompasses both a quantitative and a qualitative study of the issue at stake to ensure reliability of the findings. The results of the study suggest that there is no significant difference between the number of errors made by heritage learners and second language learners; however, the sources of these errors are often different. These sources of error and their possible reasons are discussed in this paper.

Keywords

Heritage LearnersSecond Language LearnersMedia PersianAdvanced Level PersianError SourceWritingNewspapers

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Iranian Studies , Volume 51 , Issue 5 , September 2018 , pp. 747 - 778
Copyright
Copyright © Association For Iranian Studies, Inc 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Figure 2 reproduced with permission form the copyright holder from What the Persian Media Says by Pouneh Shabani-Jadidi, ISBN 97811138825567, Routledge, Abingdon, 2015.

References

Abasi, A. R. “The Pedagogical Value of Intercultural Rhetoric: A Report from a Persian-as-a-Foreign-Language Classroom.” Journal of Second Language Writing 21 (2012): 195–220. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.05.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albirini, A., and Benmamoun, E.. “Aspects of Second Language Transfer in the Oral Production of Egyptian and Palestinian Heritage Speakers.” International Journal of Bilingualism 18, 3(2014): 244–273. 10.1177/1367006912441729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albirini, A., Benmamoun, E., and Saadah, E.. “Grammatical Features of Egyptian and Palestinian Arabic Heritage Speakers’ Oral Production.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33 (2011): 273–303. doi: 10.1017/S0272263110000768Google Scholar
Atoofi, S. “Linguistic Markers of Affect in Heritage Persian: A Linguistic Anthropological Study among Persian Heritage Language Students and Their Teachers,” International Journal of Iranian Studies 46, no. 6 (2013): 877–901. doi: 10.1080/00210862.2012.739908Google Scholar
Beeman, W. O. “Affectivity in Persian Language Use.” Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 12 (1988): 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., and Polinsky, M.. “White Papers: Prolegomena to Heritage Linguistics.” Harvard University (2010). Accessed July 4, 2018. https://scholar.harvard.edu/mpolinsky/publications/white-paper-prolegomena-heritage-linguisticsGoogle Scholar
Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., and Polinsky, M.. “Heritage Languages and Their Speakers: Opportunities and Challenges for Linguistics.” Theoretical Linguistics 39, no. 3‒4 (2013): 129–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., and Finegan, E.. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Longman, 1999.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. “Ultimate Attainment in Second Language Attainment.” Language 68, no. 1 (1992): 706–755.Google Scholar
Boon, E., and Polinsky, M.. “From Silence to Voice: Empowering Heritage Language Speakers in the 21st Century.” Harvard University. Observatorio’s Report 2‒6 (2015): 1–19.Google Scholar
Cagri, C., Jackson, S., and Megerdoomian, K.. “Testing the Linguistic Competence of Persian Heritage Speakers.” Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum: Colloquium on Understanding the Interlanguage Systems of Heritage Learners, Urbana-Champaign, IL, 2007.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris, 1981.Google Scholar
Coppieters, R. “Competence Differences between Native and Near-Native Speakers,” Language 63, no. 3 (1982): 544–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. “Cognitive-Psychological Processes in Second Language Learning.” In Handbook of Second Language Teaching, edited by Long, M. and Doughty, C., 119–138. Oxford: Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar
Fani, A. “Persian as a Heritage Language.” Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on the Iranian Diaspora, Iranian Alliances Across the Borders, UCLA, 2012.Google Scholar
Fani, A. “Persian as a Heritage Language.” Peyk 143 (2013): 19–20.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. “Diglossia.” Word 15 (1959): 325–340. doi: 10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702Google Scholar
Fishman, J. A. “300-plus Years of Heritage Language education in the United States.” In Heritage Languages in America: Preserving a National Resource. Language in Education: Theory and Practice, edited by Peyton, J. K., Ranard, D., and McGinni, S., 81–98. Washington, DC: Delta Systems Inc.; McHenry, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics, Center for Applied Linguistics, 2001.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar
Gunning, R. The Art of Writing. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1952.Google Scholar
Laleko, O. “Compositional Telicity and Heritage Russian Aspect.” In Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL) 19, edited by Grosvald, M. and Soares, D., 150–160. Davis, CA: UC Davis, 2008.Google Scholar
Laleko, O. “The Syntax-Pragmatics Interface in Language Loss: Covert Restructuring of Aspect in Heritage Russian.” PhD diss., University of Minnesota, 2010.Google Scholar
Megerdoomian, K. “Linguistic Patterns in Heritage Persian Instruction.” In Proceedings of STARTALK Persian Teacher’s Workshop for Professional Curriculum and Materials Development. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, July 2010. http://www.zoorna.org/papers/LinguisticInstruction-PersianHL.pdf. accessed July 4, 2018.Google Scholar
Modarresi, Y. “The Iranian Community in the United States and the Maintenance of Persian.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 148 (2001): 1–3. doi: 10.1515/ijsl.2001.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., and Bowles, M.. “Negative Evidence in Instructed Heritage Language Acquisition. A Study of Differential Object Marking.” In Selected Papers from SLRF 2007, edited by Bowles, M., Foote, R., and Perpiñán, S., 252–262. Somerville: Cascadila Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Moore, J., and Sadegholvad, E.. “The Linguistic Markers of Persian Heritage Language Speakers: Evidence from the Classroom.” Heritage Language Journal 10‒11 (2013): 83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortazavinia, M. “Second Language Semantics.” In Routledge Handbook of Persian Second Language Acquisition, edited by Shabani-Jadidi, P.. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, forthcoming.Google Scholar
O’Grady, W., Schafer, A., Perla, J., Lee, O.-S., and Wieting, J.. “A Psycholinguistic Tool for the Assessment of Language Loss.” Language Documentation and Conservation 3 (2009): 100–112.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. A Neurolinguistic Theory of Bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M. “Cross-Linguistic Parallels in language Loss.” Southwest Journal of Linguistics 14, no. 1‒2 (1997): 87–123.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. “A Composite Linguistic Profile of a Speaker of Russian in the U.S.” In The Learning and Teaching of Slavic Languages and Cultures: Toward the 21st Century, edited by Kagan, O. and Rifkin, B., 437–465. Bloomington, IN: Slavica, 2000.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M. “Incomplete Acquisition: American Russian.” Journal of Slavic Linguistics 14 (2006): 192–265.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., and Sprouse, R.. “Word Order and Nominative Case in Non-Native Language Acquisition: A Longitudinal Study of (L1 Turkish) German Interlanguage.” In Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar, edited by Hoekstra, T. and Schwart, B. D., 317–368. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedighi, A. “Teaching Persian to Heritage Persian Speakers,” International Journal of Iranian Studies 43‒45 (2010): 681–695.Google Scholar
Sedighi, A. “Persian as a Heritage Language.” In The Oxford Handbook of Persian Linguistics, edited by Sedighi, A. and Shabani-Jadidi, P., 361–387. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shabani-Jadidi, P. What the Persian Media Says. London and New York: Routledge, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shabani-Jadidi, P., and Sedighi, A. “Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages.” In The Oxford Handbook of Persian Linguistics, edited by Sedighi, A. and Shabani-Jadidi, P., 388–408. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer-Assisted Studies of Language and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. “The Neural Basis of Lexicon and Grammar in First and Second Language: The Declarative/Procedural Model.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, no. 4 (2001): 105–122. doi: 10.1017/S1366728901000220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdes, G. “The Teaching of Heritage Languages: An Introduction for Slavic-Teaching Professionals.” In The Learning and Teaching of Slavic Languages and Cultures, edited by Kegan, O. and Rifkin, B., 375–404. Bloomington, IN: SLAVICA, 2000.Google Scholar
White, L. Universal Grammar and Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whong-Barr, M. “What Transfers?” In Paths of Development in L1 and L2 Acquisition, edited by T. Parodi, S. Unsworth, and M. Young-Scholten, 187–199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar