Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-7fx5l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T19:08:15.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Digital Terrain Models As A Tool For Glacier Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Hermann Rentsch
Affiliation:
Kommission für Glaziologie der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, D-8000 München, Federal Republic of Germany
Walter Welsch
Affiliation:
Institut für Geodäsie, Universität der Bundeswehr München, D-8014 Neubiberg, Federal Republic of Germany
Christian Heipke
Affiliation:
Industrieanlagen-Betriebsgesellschaft mbH, D-8012 Ottobrunn, and Lehrstuhl für Photogrammetrie, Technische Universität München, D-8000 München, Federal Republic of Germany
Maynard M. Miller
Affiliation:
Glaciological and Arctic Science Institute, College of Mines and Earth Resources, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83843, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Digital terrain models (DTM) are a very important tool for all sorts of glacier studies and serve as a basis for many applications. The latest development is the combination of DTM with digital image-processing techniques which enable a much better visualization of the DTM, and thus a better interpretation of glaciological phenomena.

These new technologies have been applied in an investigation of the Vaughan Lewis Icefall, Juneau Icefield, Alaska. A DTM has been produced by means of photogrammetrie measurements, and a glacier-flow velocity of up to 5.70 m d−1 in the steepest part has been derived. The possibilities for the interpretation of the glacier topography have been significantly improved by using digital image-processing algorithms for the visualization of the DTM.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1990
Figure 0

Fig. 1. General DTM data structure combining a quad tree with local triangular networks where non-grid information is available (Ebner and others, 1988).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. The Juneau Icefield, Alaska.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. The Lewis-Gilkey Glacier complex (Coyes, unpublished).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Vaughan Lewis Ice fall (photograph by H. Rentsch).

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Set-up of the terrestrial photogrammetric observations.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Shaded relief in orthogonal projection superimposed with contour lines and ice-movement vectors.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Shaded relief in orthogonal projection superimposed with terrain cover.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Perspective view of the ice fall.