Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-v2srd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-27T09:08:01.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analyzing the seasonality of tuberculosis case notifications in the UK, 2000–2018

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2024

Lisa Glaser
Affiliation:
Travel Health, Zoonosis, Emerging Infections of Pandemic Potential and Respiratory & Tuberculosis Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK and
Ross Harris
Affiliation:
Statistics Production Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
Tehreem Mohiyuddin*
Affiliation:
Travel Health, Zoonosis, Emerging Infections of Pandemic Potential and Respiratory & Tuberculosis Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK and
Jennifer A. Davidson
Affiliation:
Travel Health, Zoonosis, Emerging Infections of Pandemic Potential and Respiratory & Tuberculosis Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK and
Sharon Cox
Affiliation:
Travel Health, Zoonosis, Emerging Infections of Pandemic Potential and Respiratory & Tuberculosis Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK and
Colin N. J. Campbell
Affiliation:
Travel Health, Zoonosis, Emerging Infections of Pandemic Potential and Respiratory & Tuberculosis Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK and
*
Corresponding author: Tehreem Mohiyuddin; Email: Tehreem.Mohiyuddin@ukhsa.gov.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Globally, there is seasonal variation in tuberculosis (TB) incidence, yet the biological and behavioural or social factors driving TB seasonality differ across countries. Understanding season-specific risk factors that may be specific to the UK could help shape future decision-making for TB control. We conducted a time-series analysis using data from 152,424 UK TB notifications between 2000 and 2018. Notifications were aggregated by year, month, and socio-demographic covariates, and negative binomial regression models fitted to the aggregate data. For each covariate, we calculated the size of the seasonal effect as the incidence risk ratio (IRR) for the peak versus the trough months within the year and the timing of the peak, whilst accounting for the overall trend. There was strong evidence for seasonality (p < 0.0001) with an IRR of 1.27 (95% CI 1.23–1.30). The peak was estimated to occur at the beginning of May. Significant differences in seasonal amplitude were identified across age groups, ethnicity, site of disease, latitude and, for those born abroad, time since entry to the UK. The smaller amplitude in older adults, and greater amplitude among South Asians and people who recently entered the UK may indicate the role of latent TB reactivation and vitamin D deficiency in driving seasonality.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Negative binomial regression model fitted onto the monthly aggregate tuberculosis notifications by earliest clinical date.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Negative binomial regression models fitted onto the total monthly aggregate tuberculosis notifications (a) and onto the mean monthly tuberculosis case counts (b) by earliest clinical date and ethnicity. Note axes differ across graphs to better visualize the data being shown.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Negative binomial regression models fitted onto the monthly aggregate tuberculosis notifications by earliest clinical date and by place of birth (a) or presence of social risk factors (b). Data for social risk factors was only available for cases from 2010. Note axes differ across graphs to better visualize the data being shown.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Size of the tuberculosis seasonal effect (amplitude), calculated as the incidence risk ratio (IRR), and 95% confidence interval error bars, for the earliest clinical date and earliest disease date by covariate.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Timing of the tuberculosis seasonal peak (shift) and 95% confidence interval error bars, for the earliest clinical date and earliest disease date by covariate.

Supplementary material: File

Glaser et al. supplementary material

Glaser et al. supplementary material
Download Glaser et al. supplementary material(File)
File 30.3 KB