Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-7fx5l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-15T08:23:56.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of model resolution on simulated wind, drifting snow and surface mass balance in Terre Adélie, East Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2017

Jan T.M. Lenaerts
Affiliation:
Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands E-mail: j.lenaerts@uu.nl
Michiel R. Van Den Broeke
Affiliation:
Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands E-mail: j.lenaerts@uu.nl
Claudio Scarchilli
Affiliation:
ENEA, Rome, Italy
Cécile Agosta
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Géophysique de l'Environnement, Grenoble, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents the impact of model resolution on the simulated wind speed, drifting snow climate and surface mass balance (SMB) of Terre Adélie and its surroundings, East Antarctica. We compare regional climate model simulations at 27 and 5.5 km resolution for the year 2009. The wind speed maxima in Terre Adélie and the narrow glacial valleys of Victoria Land are better represented at 5.5 km resolution, because the topography is better resolved. Drifting snow sublimation is >100 mm a-1 in regions with high wind speeds. Our results indicate a strong feedback between topography, wind gradients and drifting snow erosion. As a result, SMB shows much more local spatial variability at 5.5 km resolution that is controlled by drifting snow erosion, whereas the large-scale SMB gradient is largely determined by precipitation. Drifting snow processes lead to ablation in the narrow glacial valleys of Victoria Land. The integrated SMB equals 86 Gt. Although wind climate, drifting snow processes and SMB variability are better represented at 5.5 km, the area-integrated SMB is not significantly different between the simulations at 27 and 5.5 km. A horizontal resolution of 27 km is sufficient to realistically simulate ice-sheet wide SMB.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 2012
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Overview of model domain. Model topography is shown in colors, with scale ranging from 0 to 4000ma.s.l. The position of the model domain on the Antarctic ice sheet is indicated in the inset. The locations and names of the AWSs used for wind speed evaluation (Nos. 1 to 11, Fig. 3) are also given, together with the location of Talos Dome (Fig. 5).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Modeled annual mean (2009) 10m wind speed (contours) and direction (arrows) in RACMO/5.5 (left) and RACMO/27 (right). The locations of the four AWSs in Figure 4a–d are indicated by their respective letters.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Modeled mean (2009) vs observed (mean of instrumental record; Sanz Rodrigo, 2011) 10mwind speed for RACMO/5.5 (dots) and RACMO/27 (triangles), located in Victoria Land (red) and Terre Adélie (blue). The RACMO wind speeds are weighted averages of the four gridpoints surrounding the location of the AWS. Only AWSs with mean observed 10m wind speed >9ms-1 are shown. Their locations and names are given in Figure 1.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Modeled daily mean (2009) vs observed (black dots) 10m wind speed for RACMO/5.5 (red) and RACMO/27 (blue). The RACMO wind speeds are weighted averages of the four gridpoints surrounding the location of the AWS. The AWS locations are shown in Figure 2. Note that there are significant gaps in the observational data for all stations.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Modeled and observed drifting snow occurrence (markers) at Talos Dome during the period May–August 2009, and modeled horizontal snow transport, TRds, during that period (red bars). The location of Talos Dome is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Total (a) SUds and (b) ERds in 2009 as modeled byRACMO/5.5. The location transect shown in Figure 7 is shown by the thick black line.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Horizontal cross section through Terre Adélie (see Fig. 6 for location) of (a) surface elevation, (b) total surface slope in the 1 km DEM (Bamber and others, 2009), RACMO/5.5 and RACMO/27, (c) 10m wind speed and (d) ERds in 2009 from RACMO/5.5 and RACMO/27.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. (a) SMB in 2009 measured by stakes (Agosta and others, 2012) and modeled by RACMO/5.5 (dashed curve) and RACMO/27 (dotted curve). The spatial resolution is 5.5 km, and the modeled data are weighted averages of the four surrounding gridpoints. The vertical dashed bars represent one spatial standard deviation of the observations in both directions. (b) Snowfall, (c) ERdsand (d) SUdsin 2009, modeled by RACMO/5.5 (dashed curve) and RACMO/27 (dotted curve).

Figure 8

Fig. 9. SMB in 2009 as modeled by RACMO/5.5 (left) and RACMO/27 (right). Note that the 5.5 km resolution coastline and topography is shown in both plots. The location of the stake line ('S') is also shown in both plots.

Figure 9

Table 1. Domain-integrated values for the year 2009 of snowfall, rainfall, melt, runoff, refreezing, drifting snow sublimation (SUds), surface sublimation (SUs), total sublimation (SUtot = SUds + SUs) and SMB (SMB) for the RACMO/5.5 and RACMO/27 simulations

Figure 10

Fig. 10. SMB from RACMO/5.5 along Byrd Glacier. (a) Colors: SMB and location of the transect; black lines: height contours at 500m resolution. (b) SMB and its components along the transect.