Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-4jdj6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-26T02:11:03.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can the unmodified incus be used for a simpler, more cost-effective functional ossicular chain reconstruction? A retrospective clinical study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2022

J A Borgstein ,
R W Grech Open the ORCID record for R W Grech [Opens in a new window]  and
R Celikkol
J A Borgstein*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Tergooi Hospital, Blaricum, the Netherlands Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
R W Grech
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Otolaryngology, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, UK Department of Otolaryngology, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
R Celikkol
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Tergooi Hospital, Blaricum, the Netherlands
*
Author for correspondence: J A Borgstein, Department of Otolaryngology, Tergooi Hospital, Blaricum, the Netherlands E-mail: borgstein@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate patients’ hearing outcomes after ossicular chain reconstruction using unmodified autologous incus.

Methods

A single-centred, retrospective study of patients who underwent incus interposition between June 2010 and October 2017 was conducted at a Dutch secondary referral centre. This paper describes a chart review of patients who presented with erosion of the long process of the incus due to atelectasis or cholesteatoma who were treated with an unmodified incus interposition. The main outcome measures were: post-operative air–bone gap and level of air–bone gap closure.

Results

Thirty-three ears of 32 patients were included. Follow-up duration ranged from six weeks to seven years. A mean post-operative air–bone gap under 25 dB was considered successful; this was achieved in 25 patients (76 per cent), 20 (91 per cent) in the partial ossicular reconstruction prosthesis group and 5 (45 per cent) in the total ossicular reconstruction prosthesis group. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.007).

Conclusion

Successful preservation and improvement of hearing was observed in most patients. As expected, the closure rate in the partial ossicular reconstruction prosthesis group was better. Longer follow-up studies with larger case numbers are needed to assess whether further reconstruction techniques are necessary.

Keywords

StapesIncudomalleolar JointOssicular ChainHearing LossPORPTORPTympanoplasty

Information

Type
Main Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 137 , Issue 2 , February 2023 , pp. 158 - 162
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

J A Borgstein takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Borgstein, J, Achbab, S. Simple ossicular chain reconstruction during ear surgery using tragal cartilage: a retrospective clinical study in thirty-one patients: a clinical audit. Clin Otolaryngol 2017;42:734–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Celenk, F, Baglam, T, Baysal, E, Durucu, C, Karatas, ZA, Mumbuc, S et al. Management of incus long process defects: incus interposition versus incudostapedial rebridging with bone cement. J Laryngol Otol 2013;127:842–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dhanasekar, G, Khan, H, Malik, N, Wilson, F, Raut, VV. Ossiculoplasty: a UK survey. J Laryngol Otol 2006;120:903–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dornhoffer, J. Surgical management of the atelectatic ear. Am J Otol 2000;21:315–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galy-Bernadoy, C, Akkari, M, Mathiolon, C, Mondain, M, Uziel, A, Venail, F. Comparison of early hearing outcomes of type 2 ossiculoplasty using hydroxyapatite bone cement versus other materials. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2014;131:289–92CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, H, Wiet, R. Preferred technique in ossiculoplasty. Oper Tech Otolayngol Head Neck Surg 2003;14:243–610.1053/S1043-1810(03)00096-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, J. The use of tragal cartilage in ossicular reconstruction. Laryngoscope 1976;86:224–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauer, M. Ossiculoplasty: autogenous bone grafts, 34 years experience. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2000;25:257–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fong, J, Michael, P, Raut, V. Titanium versus autograft ossiculoplasty. Acta Otolaryngol 2010;130:554–810.3109/00016480903338131CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mardassi, A, Deveze, A, Sanjuan, M, Mancini, J, Parikh, B, Elbedeiwy, A et al. Titanium ossicular chain replacement prostheses: prognostic factors and preliminary functional results. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2011;128:53–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neudert, M, Zahnert, T, Lasurashvili, N, Bornitz, M, Lavcheva, Z, Offergeld, C. Partial ossicular reconstruction: comparison of three different prostheses in clinical and experimental studies. Otol Neurotol 2009;30:332–810.1097/MAO.0b013e31819679ddCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Reilly, R, Cass, S, Hirsch, B, Kamerer, D, Bernat, R, Poznanovic, S. Ossiculoplasty using incus interposition: hearing results and analysis of the middle ear risk index. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:853–810.1097/01.mao.0000185054.92265.b7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quesnel, S, Teissier, N, Viala, P, Couloigner, V, Van Den Abbeele, T. Long term results of ossiculoplasties with partial and total titanium Vario Kurz prostheses in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2010;74:1226–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sterrer, E, Loader, B. Hearing outcomes of incus-interposition vs titanium-partial ossicular replacement prostheses--hearing outcomes in 115 patients. Clin Otolaryngol 2018;43:332–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borgstein, J, Stoop, E, Halim, A, Feenstra, L. The extraordinary healing properties of the pediatric tympanic membrane: a study of atelectasis in the pediatric ear. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2008;72:1789–93CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed