X-ray diffraction

XRD patterns of raw powdered samples showed high purity of smectites. C5 was the purest sample, with 89% smectite and a small amount of palygorskite as impurity. Dolomite was the major non-clay mineral identified in three of the studied samples, except for C5, in which this carbonate was absent (Fig. 1; Table 1). The sample YA3 had the smallest smectite content (≈43%). The purest sample was C5; its XRD pattern showed the characteristic asymmetric and broad bands corresponding to the hk0 reflections of smectites together with a broad basal 001 reflection. This sample presented a shoulder in the broad 001 reflection located at 8.26°2θ (10.69 Å) that could correspond to 110 of palygorskite. KT4 and YA3 were similar; both had dolomite impurities, which were more abundant in the YA3 sample (15% and 19%, respectively). In both samples, there was a minor reflection of palygorskite – more intense and better defined in the YA3 sample, minor quantities of quartz (26.6°2θ, 3.34 Å), and a small peak at 12.11°2θ (7.30 Å) corresponding to serpentine. Additionally, quartz, feldspar, chlorite, and illite were identified. These minerals represent the detrital components, whereas smectite and palygorskite were neoformed (Yeniyol, Reference Yeniyol2012). Finally, YD28 presented only minor quantities of dolomite. It stood out with the broad band at small angles, between 4.08°2θ and 8.03°2θ, indicating the small number of layers per coherent scattering domain (CSD) in the smectite (Yeniyol, Reference Yeniyol2014; Yeniyol, Reference Yeniyol2020).

Table 1. Mineralogical composition (in percentages) from XRD

Sme = smectite, Plg = palygorskite, Qz = quartz, Dol = dolomite, Ilt = illite, K-Fsp = potassic felspar, Srp = serpentine; Dol (Ch. A.) is the content in dolomite calculated from the content in CaO of the chemical analysis.

Figure 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of raw samples. Black: C5; blue: KT4; green: YA3; and red: YD28. Sm = smectite, Plg = palygorskite, Qz = quartz, Do = dolomite, Srp = serpentine. Detailed area (inset) contains the smectite 060 d-spacings.

Oriented aggregates and their treatments (Fig. 2) confirmed smectite as the majority component and the presence of minor amounts of palygorskite in the KT4 and YA3 samples and illite, together with scarce chlorite. Palygorskite in the KT4 and YA3 samples had a 110 reflection at 10.6 Å, which corresponds to a Mg-rich palygorskite (Statopoulou et al., Reference Statopoulou, Suárez, García-Romero, Sánchez del Río, Kacandes, Gionis and Chryssikos2011). This implied that they had some sepiolite polysomes (Suárez and García-Romero, Reference Suárez and García-Romero2011).

Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of the oriented aggregates of the <2 μm fraction. Black: C5; blue: KT4; green: YA3; and red: YD28. (a) Normal environment, (b) ethylene glycol, and (c) heated at 550°C for 2 h.

The Biscaye index of smectites (Biscaye, Reference Biscaye1965) ranges between –0.2 (YD28) and 0.4 (KT4). This implies the presence of smectites with low crystallinity, especially in the YD28 sample, in which, as previously indicated, there was no ordering in the [001] direction, even though the hk0 reflection was explicit (Fig. 1). In that sample, a wide band appeared from 12 Å in oriented aggregates that moved toward smaller angles (~17 Å) in EG as corresponding to smectites. These XRD patterns of YD28 appeared like Pink Clays from Tajo (García-Romero et al., Reference García-Romero, Lorenzo, García-Vicente, Morales, García Rivas and Suárez2021; García-Romero and Suárez, Reference García-Romero and Suárez2022), where saponite appeared as tiny crystals with few 2:1 stacked layers.

The 060 reflection appeared mainly at approximately 1.52 Å in all samples, which implies that all smectites were trioctahedral. Minor differences were observed in this reflection (Fig. 1). C5 and YD28 were explicitly trioctahedral, whereas YA3 and KT4 showed a more dioctahedral component, as could be deduced from the double peak. The d-spacing was not so low as 1.49 Å; however, two maxima were present at 1.528 Å and 1.503 Å (Fig. 1). The major dioctahedral component in the YA3 and KT4 samples was palygorskite, and a minor proportion of illite was also present as revealed by the oriented aggregate patterns. These two samples had chlorite as traces as revealed by the small peak at approximately 14 Å after heating at 550°C and serpentine appearing at 7.28 Å. The presence of the 110 reflection of the palygorskite was visible in the C5 and KT4 raw samples as a shoulder and as a peak in EG patterns, while it appeared as a peak in the YA3 sample.

The mineralogical assemblages found in these samples, formed by trioctahedral smectite with carbonates and sepiolite-palygorskite, are common (Christidis and Huff, Reference Christidis and Huff2015). The neoformation of dolomite and saponite in lacustrine environments, similar to the formation environments of YA3, KT4, and YD28 (Yeniyol, Reference Yeniyol2012; Yeniyol, Reference Yeniyol2014), is frequently encountered in the Mediterranean area. Most of them are considered as Miocene or Pliocene in terms of age (Kadir et al., Reference Kadir, Baş and Karakaş2002; Akbulut and Kadir, Reference Akbulut and Kadir2003; Karakaya and Karakaya, Reference Karakaya and Karakaya2008); however, Holocene sediments with this mineralogical composition have also been identified (Abdelwahab et al., Reference Abdelwahab, Hassan and El-Sabagh2022). The studied samples correspond to a Mg-rich clay paragenesis in which saponite is a major mineral together with fibrous minerals of the sepiolite-palygorskite polysomatic series. In the sample with the greatest palygorskite content, the values for ^IVAl and octahedral vacancies, calculated from the d ₀₀₂ spacing and the equations proposed by Suárez et al. (Reference Suárez, García-Romero, Sánchez del Río, Martinetto and Dooryhée2007) were 0.95 per half unit cell (p.h.u.c.) and 0.65 p.h.u.c., respectively. These corresponded to Mg-palygorskite, which contained a large percentage of sepiolite polysomes (Suárez and García-Romero, Reference Suárez and García-Romero2011; Suárez and García-Romero, Reference Suárez and García-Romero2013).

Chemical analysis

The chemical composition was in accordance with the mineralogical content (Tables 1 and 2), as the logical and most abundant elements included Si, Mg, and Ca, ranging in the case of SiO₂ between 27.6 and 50.65%, MgO between 16.68 and 23.52%, and CaO between 0.34 and 4.68%. The loss on ignition value ranged between 20.16% (C5) and 28.2% (YA3), and its variation was related to both clay minerals and dolomite content (except C5, which does not contain dolomite). The C5 sample was the richest in Fe, being Fe³⁺-majority in comparison with other samples, because FeO was under 1%, even under the limit of detection in the YA3 sample. The sample with a smaller amount of Al₂O₃ was YD28. The contents of minor and trace elements are presented in Table 3. C5 and YD28 showed smaller values than that in KT4 and YA3, with notable exceptions. Cr had concentrations >200 ppm, except in sample YD28, which was also depleted in Co and Ni. Sample C5 stood out for its small values of Sr and Cs on the one hand and a significantly greater value of Ni on the other. Sample KT4 had the greatest concentration of elements belonging to the REE group, followed by sample YA3. The abundance of As is notable, except in sample C5 with <5 ppm, as it appears trioctahedral smectites tend to contain greater quantities of As than dioctahedral smectites (Lorenzo et al., Reference Lorenzo, Sánchez-Santos, Rivas, García-Romero and Suárez2024).

Table 2. Content of major elements in percentage of oxides

LOI = loss on ignition.

Table 3. Content of minor and trace elements in ppm

Data with < symbol indicate that the element was under the detection limit.

VNIR-SWIR spectroscopy

The reflectance spectra of the samples were similar (Fig. 3), without appreciable bands in the visible wavenumber range with two large absorption bands in the NIR region; the first at approximately 1400 nm and the second at 1900 nm, both corresponding to smectites. This is because of the overtones of fundamental stretching vibrations and combinations of stretching and bending modes of the structural OH^– groups bonded to octahedral cations and H₂O present in both the interlayer of smectites and adsorbed on the surface (Bishop et al., Reference Bishop, Madejová, Komadel and Fröschl2002; Madejová et al., Reference Madejová, Gates and Petit2017). Smaller bands owing to M-OH^– vibrations appeared between 2200 and 2400 nm, which depend on the octahedral content. Therefore, the spectra were explicitly marked by the smectites and the major absorption features corresponding to dolomite could not be observed. In dolomite, the characteristic absorption features of carbonates were due to vibrational modes of the CO₃^2– anion with a diagnostic absorption feature in the approximately 2300 nm region and a reflectance decline from 2400 nm (Cloutis et al., Reference Cloutis, Grasby, Last, Léveillé, Osinski and Sherriff2010; Gaffey, Reference Gaffey1986). Additionally, dolomite had small absorption features at approximately 1860, 1980, and 2140 nm. The diagnostic band at 2300 nm could be overlapped with that of trioctahedral smectite; however, the reflectance decline at larger wavenumber was the same in the samples with dolomite (KT4, YA3, and YD28) as in C5, which did not have dolomite. This implies that dolomite impurities did not affect the interpretation of the smectite signal in the spectra. This agrees with Santamaría et al. (Reference Santamaría-López, Suárez and García-Romero2024), who suggested that kaolinite–dolomite mixtures should contain at least 65% dolomite to enable the identification of its characteristic spectral features.

Figure 3. VNIR-SWIR spectra of the studied samples.

In fact, owing to the mineralogical similarities, the spectra of C5 and YD28 constituted one couple whereas KT4 and YA3 constituted another. An extremely wide absorption was observed in the visible region at approximately 536 nm for sample C5; this could be related to the presence of minor quantities of hematite or Fe³⁺ as octahedral cation (Báscones et al., Reference Báscones, Suárez, Ferrer-Juliá, García-Meléndez, Colmenero-Hidalgo and Quirós2020). Focusing on the region between 1000 and 2500 nm, two areas of special interest were present in these samples. First, the band at approximately 1400 nm owing to OH^– vibrations appeared in all samples with two shoulders (Fig. 3), which is the characteristic of trioctahedral smectites and sepiolite. The shoulder at 1390 nm became a peak in the YD28 sample (Fig. 3), which is characteristic of trioctahedral smectites. In the samples with greater impurity content (YA3 and KT4), this effect manifested itself as a shoulder. Another conspicuous region was 2200 to 2400 nm, where various bands (in position and/or intensity) or shoulders were identified – all related to the stretching and bending combinations involving various octahedral cations in clay minerals (Madejová et al., Reference Madejová, Gates and Petit2017). The absorptions (Fig. 3) located at approximately 2350 and 2388 nm were related to trioctahedral 3Mg-OH bonds. Minor effects at 2220 and 2250 nm were due to the presence of octahedral Al and Fe³⁺ cations. These were more intense in YA3 and KT4, whereas those at 2350 and 2388 nm were more intense in C5 and YD28. This is in good agreement with the mineralogy of these two samples, because YA3 and KT4 have more palygorskite and illite in the clay fraction, whereas C5 and YD28 are richer in Mg-smectite.

Thermal analysis

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential thermal analysis (DTA), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) were also conducted (see Figs S1–S3 in the Supplementary material). The derivative of the TGA curves (DTG) was obtained for each sample (Fig. 4). Thermogravimetric curves showed progressive loss of weight, although with notable differences among the samples. These losses were related to the peaks in DTG and the endothermic effects in DTA and DSC curves, with only an exothermic effect at high temperature (approximately 810°C). Trioctahedral smectites constitute the major component in the samples together with dolomite. Smectites had only three signals in the range of temperature studied: (1) at low temperature, dehydration of adsorbed and interlayer water occurred, which implies endothermic effect and a loss of weight; (2) dehydroxylation occurred at >700°C, and is related to an endothermic effect and loss of weight; and (3) the transformation into an anhydrous phase at >800°C, which was shown as an exothermic effect. Scarce references are available on the thermal behavior of trioctahedral smectites that differ from dioctahedral smectites, in which cis and trans vacants affect the dehydroxylation temperature (Drits et al., Reference Drits, Lindgreen, Salyn, Ylagan and McCarty1998). Dehydroxylation of the octahedral sheet of trioctahedral smectites occurred just before phase transformation at highest temperatures, usually at >700°C. These smectites had no other endothermic or exothermic effect in the region between 100 and 700°C owing to the lack of octahedral vacancies (Steudel et al., Reference Steudel, Friedrich, Schuhmann, Ruf, Sohling and Emmerich2017; Derkowski and Kuligiewicz, Reference Derkowski and Kuligiewicz2023).

Figure 4. DTG of the studied samples.

Conversely, the major impurity present in three samples was dolomite, which had a characteristic endothermic peak due to: (1) thermal decomposition into calcite + MgO (periclase) and (2) the thermal decomposition of calcite at temperatures that depends on CO₂ pressure. The first effect appears as a shoulder or change of inflexion of the second endothermic peak in the DTG curve (Resio, Reference Resio2023). According to Li and Messing (Reference Li and Messing1983), the notable variability in decomposition temperatures of dolomite and differences may be due to experimental factors, such as sample size, grain size, heating rate, atmospheric conditions, and the influence of other minerals, which can affect dolomite decomposition extensively. In the studied samples, the endothermic peak related to dolomite, with an associated loss of weight, is approximately 700°C in the three samples containing dolomite. Dolomite can show an effect under 700°C when ground for several hours (Ozao et al., Reference Ozao, Ochiai, Yamazaki and Otsuka1991). However, the samples studied here were ground within a few minutes. The low temperature for dolomite decomposition is probably related to the influence of clay minerals. The intensity of the major peak (between 650 and 700°C) in the DTG in the three samples with dolomite was in accordance with the proportion of dolomite calculated via both XRD and chemical analysis (Tables 1 and 2). A large correlation was observed between the calculated quantity of dolomite and the intensity of the peak at 700°C in the DTG curve (see Fig. S4 in the Supplementary material). The more intense effect was observed in sample YA3 = 46% dolomite, followed by KT4 = 22% dolomite, and YD28 = 16% dolomite.

In the samples studied, the major effect at the lowest temperature was an endothermic peak at <100°C due to the dehydration of adsorbed and interlayer water, with a loss of weight between 9.77% (YA3) and 12.44% (YD28). This was in good agreement with the content in smectite because these samples contain 43% and 85% smectite, respectively. C5 and YA3 showed a small shoulder in the DTG and ADT at approximately 80°C (Fig. 4; Fig. S1), probably because of the presence of different interlayer cations in the smectite (El-Barawy et al., Reference El-Barawy, Girgis and Felix1986). The YA3 sample and KT4 and C5 with extremely small intensity, also showed a peak or shoulder at approximately 175°C in DTG (Fig. 3), which corresponded to palygorskite dehydration because of the release of zeolitic water in the fibrous mineral (Frost and Ding, Reference Frost and Ding2003). The presence of Mg-palygorskite, identified via XRD, also influenced the region between 200 and 500°C because this mineral has a wide endothermic effect due to the partial dehydration and folding of the structure between 350 and 450°C (Frost and Ding, Reference Frost and Ding2003).

At the highest temperatures, dehydroxylation and phase transformation of smectite occurred, as previously mentioned, and a small exothermic peak appeared in the DTA and DSC curves with the loss of weight in the TGA (Figs S1 and S3; Fig. 3), although the loss of weight is smaller than expected according to the mineralogical content of the samples, which could indicate a progressive dehydroxylation of the samples from lower temperatures. On the other hand, the exothermic effect due to the recrystallization of a new phase was present in all samples with small differences in the temperature. In KT4 and YA3, recrystallization appeared at 778°C whereas C5 and YD28 made another couple displaying recrystallization effect at 823°C. DTG curves also displayed structural similarities between KT4 and YA3 on the one hand, and between C5 and YD28 on the other hand (Fig. 4). According to Vogels et al. (Reference Vogels, Kloprogge, Geus and Beers2005), after an initial amorphization, pyroxene- and olivine-like structures could form. The temperature difference required for the phase transformation in these samples could be related to crystal-chemical differences, size of crystals, or the influence of other minerals. According to Drits et al. (Reference Drits, Lindgreen, Salyn, Ylagan and McCarty1998), the more heterogeneous the octahedral composition, the wider the range of smectite dehydroxylation temperature. In this case, the range in dehydroxylation temperatures indicated that the samples are not completely trioctahedral.

Scanning electron microscopy

The samples were studied via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to observe their microstructure. C5 appeared a highly homogeneous material (Fig. 5a), with un-oriented small aggregates of laminar particles with pores of a few hundred nanometers. The samples KT4 and YA3 were mutually similar (Fig. 5b–e). The aggregates of laminar particles in these two samples showed a closer microstructure than in C5, and they surrounded dispersed dolomite crystals that occasionally attained the size of several microns (Fig. 5b). The YD28 sample was completely different, appearing like corrugated textile, where it was impossible to differentiate particles with the level of magnification used (Fig. 5f). This sample showed an open texture like that of the sepiolite shown by García-Romero and Suárez (2013), which were obtained after suspension in water and sedimentation of samples.

Figure 5. Representative images of the samples by SEM. (a) C5; (b) KT4; (c,d,e) YA3; (f) YD28. Dol = dolomite, Plg = palygorskite, Sep = sepiolite.

Furthermore, in C5, KT4, and YA3, isolated fibrous particles or tiny bundles were observed occasionally (Fig. 5b,d,e). However, a unique characteristic of these three samples was the presence of laminar particles that presented fibrous terminations at their edges. The fibers were well developed only in a few cases (Fig. 5e). In all cases, sepiolite-palygorskite fibers were not well developed, lacking the typical bundles that characterize these minerals. However, they appeared intimately related to smectites, exhibiting a narrow textural relationship, which suggested transformation reactions involving smectite and the fibrous mineral.

Transmission electron microscopy and point analyses

The morphology of single crystals of smectites was studied via TEM (Fig. 6). According to mineralogical characterization, the characteristic laminar morphology with diffuse edges were the most abundant in the samples. However, some fibrous crystals were also observed in all samples. The size of smectite crystals rarely exceeded 0.5 μm in their large dimension. KT4 and YA3 also showed scarce surrounded laminar particles of illite, 1–2 μm in size. This mineral was also identified via XRD in these samples.

Figure 6. Representative images of smectites under TEM. (a) C5, (b) C5-Ca, (c) KT4, (d) KT4Ca, (e) YA3, (f) YA3-Ca, (g) YD28, and (h) YD28-Ca.

The samples were analyzed under natural conditions after homoionization with Ca²⁺ to ascertain octahedral Mg²⁺ and interlayer contents (García-Romero et al., Reference García-Romero, Manchado, Suárez and García Rivas2019). No isolated fibers or mixed particles were analyzed. The major element contents in oxides of all smectitic particles analyzed before and after homoionization (Tables S1 and S2 in the Supplementary material) showed large variability. All data were fitted as 2:1 phyllosilicates, for O₂₀(OH)₄ (Table S3 in the Supplementary material). The mean structural formulae were obtained from the mean and standard deviation of the oxide contents and the structural formula fitted from the mean values of major elements contents for both natural and homoionized samples (Table 4).

Table 4. Major elements (% weight of oxides) from point analyses by AEM, mean values, and standard deviation (SD), and structural formula fitted for O₂₂(OH)₄ from these mean values

ΣIV = number of tetrahedral cations, ΣVI = number of octahedral cations, QIV = tetrahedral charge, QVI = octahedral charge, QL = layer charge, QIL = interlayer charge.

The content of CaO increased in the homoionic samples, confirming the successful exchange of cations. The differences among the samples before and after homoionization indicated that Mg was an interlayer cation in the natural samples, as expected. Therefore, the Ca-samples were suitable for studying the crystal-chemistry of these smectites. The contents in SiO₂, Al₂O₃, Fe₂O₃, and MgO were plotted both for natural and Ca-homoionized smectites (Fig. 7). Greater modification occurred for the YA3 sample after homoionization. The proportion of mean values of these oxides varied in all samples after homoionization. SiO₂ increased in all samples, except for C5, whereas the other oxides decreased, mainly MgO, logically. This indicates that Mg²⁺ was an interlayer cation in natural samples. The samples differed: C5 had the smallest SiO₂ and greatest Fe₂O₃ content, whereas YD28 had the greatest SiO₂ and MgO contents. KT4 and YA3 had the smallest MgO and greatest Al₂O₃ content among these samples. A certain proportion of K⁺ remained after homoionization, mainly in sample KT4 – and to a lesser extent, in YA3 and C5 (Fig. 7; Table S2). This K⁺ must be related to a minor proportion of interstratified mica-type layers in the smectite crystals (Hoang-Minh et al., Reference Hoang-Minh, Kasbohm, Nguyen-Thanh, Nga, Lai, Duong, Thanh, Thuyet, Anh, Pusch, Knutsson and Ferreiro-Mahlmann2019; García-Romero et al., Reference García-Romero, Lorenzo, García-Vicente, Morales, García Rivas and Suárez2021) – even in C5, in which mica had not been identified via XRD.

Figure 7. Chemical data of point analyses for both natural and Ca-homoionic samples. Key: Ca-SAP-HC = Ca-high charge saponite, Ca-SAP-LC = Ca-low charge saponite, Ca-STV-HC = Ca-high charge stevensite, Ca-STV-LC = Ca-low charge stevensite, PLG = palygorskite, SEPI = sepiolite.

The Fe₂O₃ content calculated via AEM was greater in C5, intermediate in KT4 and YA3, and smaller in YD28. This agreed with the depth of the wide absorption feature found at approximately 900 nm in the VNIR-SWIR spectra and with the background in the XRD-patterns that was greater with higher Fe content in the samples owing to the fluorescence of this element.

Considering the Ca-homoionized samples only, the mean formulae obtained of individual point analyses did not fit properly for trioctahedral smectites, except for the C5-Ca sample. In this sample, both the mean formula and all particles analyzed fitted as a low-charge saponite (between –0.40 and –0.54 of layer charge per unit cell), with octahedral Al³⁺ and Fe³⁺, which led to an octahedral occupancy between 5.25 and 5.50 octahedral cations per unit cell (p.u.c.) (Table S4). Additionally, this sample showed the smallest standard deviation values for all structural parameters calculated. However, the point analysis of KT4, YA3, and YD28 did not fit properly as smectite. In the group of formulae obtained for smectites of the KT4 and YA3 samples (Table S4), most particles did not fit as smectites. This is because both the number of silicon atoms, the layer charge, and the number of occupied octahedral positions were not compatible with trioctahedral smectites, nor with any other 2:1 phyllosilicate.

In YA3-Ca, only 27.6% of the particles fitted as saponite. The other particles did not fit as 2:1 minerals because they had >8 Si atoms p.u.c. In fact, the number of tetrahedral positions reached 8.57 p.u.c. This occurred for the YD28 sample; however, in this case, all formulae contained >8 Si atoms p.u.c., with a mean value of 8.25 and a standard deviation of 0.08 (Table S4). After Ca-homoionization, both the values obtained for layer and interlayer charges increased and the number of octahedral cations decreased with respect to the values calculated in the non-homoionic samples (Tables S3 and S4), in accordance with García-Romero et al. (Reference García-Romero, Lorenzo, García-Vicente, Morales, García Rivas and Suárez2021). According to the number of octahedral cations, smectites in the C5-Ca and YD28-Ca samples were explicitly trioctahedral, in good agreement with the 060 reflection in XRD at 1.52 Å. However, the mean formulae fitted for KT4-Ca and YA3-Ca had dioctahedral properties because the numbers of octahedral cations were 4.65 and 4.22, respectively. These values are anomalous because, although they presented a double peak at 1.50–1.52 Å, the second was more intense, and therefore, the smectites – the majority phyllosilicates in those samples – must have been trioctahedral. However, the number of octahedral cations was not the only parameter that failed to fit properly in the mean structural formulae of KT4-Ca and YA3-Ca. These two samples and Y28-Ca had >8 Si atoms (p.u.c.). These structural formulae were obtained via point analysis. Contamination with other mineral particles could not be claimed to explain these anomalous compositions. This is because it occurred for all analyses in the YD28 sample and for most of them in KT4-Ca and YA3-Ca. Additionally, analysis locations were chosen on surfaces of smectitic particles.

Crystal-chemistry of clay minerals is complex. Clay crystals may contain minor quantities of substances adsorbed on their surfaces and frequently appear as interstratified with other clay minerals in such a manner that they are often structurally heterogeneous. The excess of Si could be related to the presence of amorphous silica adsorbed on the surface of the smectitic particles (Moore and Reynolds, Reference Moore and Reynolds1997) or the presence of intergrowth of other minerals with a larger ratio of Si/octahedral cations, such as sepiolite-palygorskite.

To visualize the variability of the composition of the smectitic particles, the results of the point analyses were plotted in two ternary plots together with the composition of ideal sepiolite, palygorskite, and saponite and stevensite of low and high charges (Fig. 7). This plot showed large variability of composition in natural and homoionic samples. The composition of these particles must lie in the region between palygorskite and most magnesian clays (sepiolite, stevensite, and low-charge saponite). Both the mean structural formula and all point analyses of KT4 and YA3 plotted between palygorskite and the region richest in Mg minerals, C5 plotted between high-charge saponite and palygorskite, and YD28 plotted closer to the sepiolite and stevensite. These projections show that the smectitic particles have intermediate composition between laminar and fibrous minerals, although only laminar particles were analyzed.

Final remarks

These samples can be described as bentonites, because their major minerals were trioctahedral smectites, with impurities of dolomite and minor quantities of minerals of the sepiolite-palygorskite series.

The most interesting features were related to the crystal-chemistry of the smectitic particles. All point analyses of smectites in these samples did not fit properly for Mg-smectites, having a composition intermediate between smectites and sepiolite-palygorskite. According to the XRD and the observations under TEM, all samples had a proportion of fibers intimately mixed with the small laminar particles. In a few cases, contamination may have occurred because of the mixture of particles in the analysis. However, the crystal-chemistry of these smectitic particles is complex and the results of the point analysis cannot be explained solely by the possible contamination of fibers. Conversely, it must be related to the structural complexity of these smectites in which intergrowths/interstratification could exist.

This study will contribute to the knowledge of the crystal-chemistry of Mg-smectites. It shows narrow relationships among Mg-smectites and sepiolite-palygorskite. However, more studies on the crystal-chemistry and structure of Mg-clays are needed in order to improve the knowledge of these relationships among Mg-clay minerals.