Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-g98kq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T14:29:44.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Maternal health care in India: access and demand determinants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2013

Perianaygam Arokiasamy
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Development Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Deonar, Mumbai, India
Jalandhar Pradhan*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, National Institute of Technology (NIT), Rourkela, Orissa, India Postdoctoral Researcher, UNFPA/NIDI Resource Flows Project, Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute, Lange Houtstraat, Den Haag, The Netherlands
*
Correspondence to: Dr Jalandhar Pradhan, Assistant Professor, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, National Institute of Technology (NIT), Rourkela, Orissa 769 008, India. Email: jpp_pradhan@yahoo.co.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aim

In this paper, we assess the degree to which the observed consistency in maternal health-care utilization can be accounted for by social and economic demand determinants at individual and household level on the one hand and community access to health services in terms of health, road and education facilities on the other.

Data and methods

Data from the three rounds of national family health survey of India (NFHS-1, -2 and -3) conducted in 1992–93, 1998–99 and 2005–06 are used in this analysis. The results of the analysis are presented in two sections. First, statewise profiles of maternal health-care utilization from NFHS-1, -2 and -3 are presented to compare the trends. Second, the influence of demand and access factors estimated from multi-level logistic regression models are presented for selected states of India.

Results

Results reveal that inequalities in maternal health-care utilization by socio-economic status have narrowed because of the impact of complementing factors of greater community access, and social and economical advancement in the south Indian states, where overall maternal health-care coverage is at the top end of the scale. In contrast, in the demographically lagging northern states of India, which are at the bottom end of the health coverage scale, both access and socio-economic demand determinants indicate greater inequalities in maternal health-care utilization.

Conclusion

Lack of access to health care, slow progress in socio-economic conditions and cultural constraints are major determinants of poor maternal health-care coverage among Indian states.

Information

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 
Figure 0

Table 1 Percent distribution of births whose mothers received recommended maternal health care in major states and India, NFHS-1, -2 and -3 (1992–93, 1998–99 and 2005–06)

Figure 1

Figure 1 Trends in percentage of women receiving ANC (three visits), NFHS-1, -2 and -3, 1992–93, 1998–99, 2005–06. ANC = antenatal care; NFHS = national family health survey.

Figure 2

Figure 2 Trends in coverage of institutional delivery by states and India, NFHS-1, -2 and -3, 1992–93, 1998–99, 2005–06. ANC = antenatal care; NFHS = national family health survey.

Figure 3

Table 2 Percentage of births delivered in medical facilities and assisted by health professionals in states and India, NFHS-1, -2 and -3 (1992–93, 1998–99 and 2005–06)

Figure 4

Table 3 Multilevel logistic regression estimates (coefficients) of full antenatal care usea in rural areas of selected states, 1998–99

Figure 5

Table 4 Multilevel logistic regression estimates (coefficients) of safe delivery coverage in rural areas of selected states, 1998–99

Figure 6

Appendix Table A1 Percentage of full ANCa coverage by demographic and socio-economic factors in selected states, NFHS (1998–99)

Figure 7

Table A2 Percentage of safe deliveriesa by demographic and socio-economic factors in selected states, NFHS (1998–99)

Figure 8

Table A3 Percentage of mothers who received full antenatal carea by access-related factors in rural areas of selected states, 1998–99