Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-f97m6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-17T23:15:31.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of emergency department ultrasound machines for the presence of occult blood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2018

Zafrina Poonja ,
Jasmene Uppal ,
Stuart J. Netherton ,
Rhonda Bryce ,
Andrew W. Lyon  and
Bruce Cload
Zafrina Poonja*
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.
Jasmene Uppal
Affiliation:
College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK
Stuart J. Netherton
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK
Rhonda Bryce
Affiliation:
Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK
Andrew W. Lyon
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, SK
Bruce Cload
Affiliation:
Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK
*
Correspondence to: Dr. Zafrina Poonja, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, 790 University Terrace Building, 8303 112 Street, Edmonton, AB T6G 2T4; Email: zafrinapoonja@gmail.com

Abstract

Objectives

Bedside ultrasound in the emergency department is a common diagnostic tool, especially when evaluating trauma patients. Many trauma patients have blood on their chest and abdomen that may contact the probe during examination. The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether occult blood contamination was present on the emergency department ultrasound machine, both after daily use and after use in trauma.

Methods

For a period of 31 days, the ultrasound machine at the trauma centre emergency department in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, was tested once daily and following all Level 1 traumas. The ultrasound machine probes and keyboard were swabbed, and contamination was detected using a commercially available phenolphthalein blood testing kit. Any visible blood contamination was also noted. The machine was then cleaned following each positive test and re-tested to ensure the absence of contamination.

Results

Over the study period, the ultrasound machine tested positive for occult blood contamination on 10% of daily tests and on 43% of assessments after its use in trauma. The curvilinear probe was most frequently contaminated (daily, 6%; trauma, 26%), followed by the keyboard (daily, 3%; trauma, 26%), but both lacked visible contamination.

Conclusions

In this single centre study, there was evidence of occult blood on the emergency department ultrasound machine after both routine use and major trauma cases, highlighting the need for a standardized cleaning and disinfection protocol.

Résumé

Objectif

L’échographie au chevet du patient est un examen de diagnostic courant au service des urgences (SU), surtout dans l’évaluation de cas de trauma. Bon nombre de blessés ont du sang sur la poitrine et l’abdomen, matière susceptible d’entrer en contact avec la sonde au cours de l’examen. L’étude avait donc pour objectif principal la recherche de contamination par du sang occulte sur l’échographe au SU, et ce, tant après l’utilisation quotidienne de l’appareil qu’après son utilisation dans les cas de trauma.

Méthode

L’échographe utilisé au SU du centre de traumatologie de Saskatoon, en Saskatchewan, a fait l’objet d’analyses une fois par jour et après tous les cas de trauma de niveau I, et ce, sur une période de 31 jours. Des prélèvements ont été effectués par écouvillonnage sur les sondes ainsi que sur le clavier de l’appareil, et la recherche de contamination se faisait à l’aide d’une trousse commerciale d’analyse de sang à base de phénolphtaléine. De plus, toute trace visible de contamination par le sang était notée. L’appareil était nettoyé chaque fois que le résultat était positif, et un nouveau prélèvement était effectué pour s’assurer de l’absence de contamination.

Résultats

Des résultats positifs de contamination par du sang occulte ont été enregistrés, sur toute la période d’étude, dans 10% des analyses quotidiennes et dans 43 % des évaluations suivant l’utilisation de l’appareil dans les cas de trauma. La sonde curviligne était très souvent contaminée (prélèvement quotidien : 6%; après un trauma : 26%), suivie du clavier (prélèvement quotidien : 3%; après un trauma : 26%), mais aucune de ces parties ne portait de trace visible de contamination.

Conclusion

Il ressort de cette étude monocentrique qu’il y avait présence de sang occulte sur l’appareil d’échographie au SU, tant après son utilisation quotidienne qu’après son utilisation dans les cas de trauma grave, d’où la nécessité d’un protocole uniforme de nettoyage et de désinfection.

Keywords

blood contaminationemergency departmentoccult contaminationultrasound

Information

Type
Brief Original Contribution
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , May 2019 , pp. 395 - 398
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2018 

CLINICIAN’S CAPSULE

What is known about the topic?

Bedside ultrasound is a frequently used tool in the emergency department (ED), with no standard cleaning protocols in place.

What did this study ask?

Is there visible and occult contamination of the ED ultrasound machine after daily use and in trauma?

What did this study find?

This study found that the ultrasound machine tested positive for occult blood contamination on 10% of daily tests and on 43% of assessments after use in trauma.

Why does this study matter to clinicians?

Standard cleaning practices should be implemented to reduce contamination rates.

INTRODUCTION

The use of bedside ultrasound in the emergency department (ED) is an everyday practice. Its uses include procedural guidance and providing diagnostic information, particularly in trauma.Reference Henneberry, Hanson and Healey 1 , Reference Kim, Theoret and Liao 2 In trauma, a common application is the extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (eFAST), which evaluates the patient’s peritoneal, pericardial, and pleural spaces for free fluid and lung collapse.Reference Rippey and Royse 3

Many trauma patients have blood on their skin in the regions assessed by the eFAST exam. Ultrasound blood contamination is a safety issue for patients and ultrasound users. Despite the lack of apparent gross contamination, practitioners should still practice safe disinfection of the ultrasound after every use, because viruses may be transmitted through dry blood.Reference Nyhsen, Humphreys and Nicolau 4 The presence of occult blood has been shown on medical equipment that contacts patients.Reference Hall 5 The incidence of occult blood contamination of ultrasound machines is not known; however, the presence of visible contamination and bacterial colonization has been shown.Reference Sanz, Theoret and Liao 6 , Reference Shokoohi, Armstrong and Tansek 7 Therefore, the primary goal of this study is to evaluate the trauma centre ED ultrasound machine for the presence of occult and visible blood contamination after routine daily use and its use in traumas.

METHODS

This study occurred over a 31-day period (June 15, 2016, to July 15, 2016) at the Royal University Hospital (RUH), the trauma centre in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. The RUH ED ultrasound machine was tested for visible and occult blood once daily at random times, based on the testers availability, between 0900 and 2359 hours, and after each Level 1 trauma. The machine was inspected for any visible blood and then swabbed to test for occult blood contamination. Four areas on the machine were tested: the linear, cardiac, and curvilinear probes, and the keyboard. If one or more of the four zones were found to be positive for visible or occult blood, the assessment was considered positive. The machine was tested for blood as soon as possible after trauma team use. In our institution, it is the responsibility of the user, not the cleaning staff, to clean the ultrasound machine.

To test for occult blood, the entire ultrasound machine keyboard and probes were swabbed in a predefined pattern using a three-step reduced phenolphthalein test kit based on the Kastle-Meyer reaction (DAVTECH Analytical Services [Canada] Inc.) to test for the presence of hemoglobin on the swab.Reference Louie, Lau and Lee 8 If a positive result was returned, the machine was thoroughly cleaned by the tester in a standard protocol with towels and germicidal wipes, then re-tested to ensure the absence of occult blood contamination. See Appendix 1 for further details.

RESULTS

The ultrasound machine was tested daily 31 times and after 23 Level 1 traumas, resulting in a total of 54 assessments. There was visible blood contamination on two separate occasions, both after a trauma. There was no visible blood contamination on daily inspections. There were three occasions (10% of daily tests) where occult blood was found on daily inspections and 10 occasions (43% of post-trauma tests) where occult blood was found after Level 1 traumas (Table 1). For further detail on location and frequency of contamination, see Appendix 2. After cleaning the ultrasound machine when occult or visible blood was detected, the absence of residual occult blood was confirmed 100% of the time. The ultrasound machine was evaluated for blood within 1 hour of trauma arrival in 82% of cases, and all tests were completed within 2.5 hours of the trauma team’s arrival.

Table 1

Positive tests for visible or occult blood on the ultrasound machine on daily testing (n=31 days) or after Level 1 traumas (n=23 traumas)

* Blood present on multiple areas during a single assessment was considered as one positive assessment.

DISCUSSION

Our results show the presence of visible and occult blood on our ultrasound machine, primarily after traumas. The risk of transmitting a virus through ultrasound procedures is possibleReference Nyhsen, Humphreys and Nicolau 4 ; however, we did not attempt to look for the presence of any blood borne viruses from the samples, because this was not within the scope of this study. Occult blood has been shown to be present on medical equipment that contacts patients,Reference Hall 5 and ultrasound probes have been shown to be contaminated with visible blood, used gel,Reference Sanz, Theoret and Liao 6 and bacteria.Reference Shokoohi, Armstrong and Tansek 7 Although ours is a small study, we feel it adds to the literature that highlights the importance of ultrasound cleaning in the ED. With increasing ultrasound usage, the potential for iatrogenic infection, while still small, may increase. This calls for ultrasound user education and departmental protocols with standard cleaning/disinfecting techniques. Cleaning protocols should be enacted for routine cleaning after every patient encounter. The tools to properly clean the ultrasound machine are already present in the ED, and, although remembering to clean the machine during a busy shift may not be automatic, a protocolized methodology may help improve the machine’s cleanliness. Our finding that germicidal wipes were able to remove all traces of occult blood during the study suggests that this is not difficult to accomplish.

LIMITATIONS

Foremost, this is a single centre, small observational study. We feel the results are valid; however, for more generalizable conclusions, this type of investigation would need to be expanded to multiple trauma centres.

We assumed that the ultrasound was used during each trauma; although, we did not formally document evidence of its use. If the ultrasound was not actually used in all trauma evaluations, the true proportion of trauma-related ultrasound contaminations is expected to be even higher.

Because daily swab assessments were performed only once per day, it is possible that periods of contamination were missed between swabs and that residual contamination from daily use was actually present prior to trauma use. Although this may be a consideration, we feel it does not affect conclusions. If this were true, however, then having occult blood present from daily use is even more alarming.

As with any chemical testing procedure, the potential exists for false negatives and false positives. This is a well-defined procedure for the detection of occult blood,Reference Louie, Lau and Lee 8 and similar studies have been published using the same testing strategy.Reference Hall 5 We feel that the unlikely potential for false negatives and false positives does not impact the overall conclusions of this study.

CONCLUSION

In this single centre study, there was evidence of occult blood on the ED ultrasound machine after routine use and major trauma cases, highlighting the need for a standardized cleaning and disinfection protocol.

Competing interests

None declared.

Financial support

This research received support from the University of Saskatchewan College of Medicine (Dean’s Summer Student Research Project 2016). This study received no funding from commercial sources.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2018.447

References

REFERENCES

1. Henneberry, RJ, Hanson, A, Healey, A, et al. Use of point of care sonography by emergency physicians. CJEM 2012;14(2):106-112, 10.2310/8000.Google Scholar
2. Kim, DJ, Theoret, J, Liao, MM, et al. The current state of ultrasound training in Canadian emergency medicine programs: perspectives from program directors. Acad Emerg Med 2012;19(9):1073-1078, 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01430.x.Google Scholar
3. Rippey, JC, Royse, AG. Ultrasound in trauma. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2009;23(3):343-362.Google Scholar
4. Nyhsen, CM, Humphreys, H, Nicolau, C, et al. Infection prevention and ultrasound probe decontamination practices in Europe: a survey of the European Society of Radiology. Insights Imaging 2016;7(6):841-847, 10.1007/s13244-016-0528-z.Google Scholar
5. Hall, JR. Blood contamination of anesthesia equipment and monitoring equipment. Anesth Analg 1994;78(6):1136-1139.Google Scholar
6. Sanz, GE, Theoret, J, Liao, MM, et al. Bacterial contamination and cleanliness of emergency department ultrasound probes. CJEM 2011;13(6):384-389, 10.2310/8000.2011.110409.Google Scholar
7. Shokoohi, H, Armstrong, P, Tansek, R. Emergency department ultrasound probe infection control: challenges and solutions. Open Access Emerg Med 2015;7:1-9. 10.2147/OAEM.S50360.Google Scholar
8. Louie, RF, Lau, MJ, Lee, JH, et al. Multicenter study of the prevalence of blood contamination on point-of-care glucose meters and recommendations for controlling contamination. Point Care 2005;4(4):158-163, 10.1097/01.poc.0000189933.35225.77.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Positive tests for visible or occult blood on the ultrasound machine on daily testing (n=31 days) or after Level 1 traumas (n=23 traumas)

Supplementary material: File

Poonja et al. supplementary material

Appendix 1

Download Poonja et al. supplementary material(File)
File 12.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Poonja et al. supplementary material

Appendix 2

Download Poonja et al. supplementary material(File)
File 12.7 KB