Hostname: page-component-77c78cf97d-rv6c5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-24T09:00:05.957Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Novel shearing apparatuses in confined flow for investigating recrystallization and fabric evolution processes in mono- and polycrystalline ice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2017

D. Samyn
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka, Japan E-mail: desamyn.geo@zoho.com
N. Azuma
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka, Japan E-mail: desamyn.geo@zoho.com
I. Matsuda
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Mechanical Engineering, Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka, Japan
Y. Osabe
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Mechanical Engineering, Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The orientations of individual crystals within a polycrystalline aggregate subjected to stress have a strong influence on its bulk strain rate and flow behavior. The ability to include the effect of crystal fabric and recrystallization processes in an ice flow law, especially at the bottom of glaciers and ice sheets where temperature is close to the pressure-melting point, is important because the stratigraphy of the ice body may be affected and the paleoclimate reconstruction hampered. We present herein three newly developed deformation apparatuses offering the possibility, from single experiments, of investigating different finite strain stages and their corresponding c-axis fabric and grain texture patterns in various confined, shear flow configurations (simple shear, pure shear and compression/extension bending). The technical set-ups and major advantages compared to classical methods are explained, and results from experiments are discussed in order to illustrate the functioning and purposes of the methods. In all experiments, significant variations in the microstructural development have been observed that reflect the varying orientations of the anisotropy and its relationship to the stress pattern. In monocrystalline ice-bending experiments, the pre-existing c-axis fabric is shown to have a profound influence on the response to stress and possibly to the type of slip system activated.

Information

Type
Instruments and Methods
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 2009
Figure 0

Fig. 1. U-shaped simple shear apparatus. (a) Schematic drawing of the mold. (b) Picture of the toothed wheel and ice specimen. The rotation direction of the drive wheel is clockwise. The horizontal stripe in the upper part of the ice sample is a shear deformation marker within an undeformed region of the specimen. (c) Schematic drawing of the whole system, including the motor and pulleys. (d) Wheel configuration (C is the center of rotation).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Spiral-shaped bending apparatus. (a) Schematic drawing of the mold. (b) Schematic drawing of the whole system, including the motor.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Schematics of the spiral configuration. The spiral-shaped channel is displayed in bold in the upper panel. The lower panel is a blow-up across the channel width.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Pure shear apparatus. (a) Schematic drawing of the mold and the ice specimen at mid-deformation course. (b) Mold configuration. The dashed straight lines along the long axis of the mold interior represent the outer limits for idealized flow conditions. Square insets represent the stress patterns (given by the arrows) and shear planes (given by the dashed lines) in the mold.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Sample layout after deformation. (a) Rotation and deformation partitions. (b) Example of grain outlines (from part 2) obtained by optical microscopy (polycrystalline ice sample). The stress pattern (given by the arrows) and the shear planes (given by the dashed lines) in the mold are represented by the square inset.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Grain size, aspect ratio and elongation direction profiles at the end of various simple shear increments. Red and blue curves represent the log-normal and GEV best-fit probability distributions, respectively.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Fabric Schmidt plots at various shear strain increments (polar equal-area projection). The number of grains analyzed is >80 for each increment. Arrows represent the radial direction at the end of the indicated strain interval, normal to the mean instantaneous flow direction. The reference frame to present the data and that of the corresponding thin sections is identical. The inner circle represents the 458 dip delineation. Square insets represent the stress patterns (given by the arrows) and shear planes (given by the dashed lines) in the mold.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. The c-axis misorientation between neighboring and random pairs of grains.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Misorientations between neighboring pairs of grains (θM-n) and between random pairs of grains (θM-r), from 0 to 36% strain. (a) Continuous distribution functions for all misorientation values; (b) mean probability densities for misorientations less than 15°.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Cross-polarized images of monocrystals at various stages of their path through the spiral bending apparatus. (a) Experiment I; (b) experiment II. Scale is given by the ice specimen width (20 mm). The front sample parts in both experiments are made up of isotropic granular ice and therefore do not reflect the strain undergone by the monocrystals.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Deviation of the monocrystal c-axis orientations from the radial direction, measured from 0 to 225° of rotation.

Figure 11

Fig. 12. Grain size, aspect ratio and elongation direction profiles at various pure shear increments. (a) Deformation in the upper mold (εx(U)); (b) deformation in the lower mold (εx(L)). Red, blue and green curves represent the log-normal, GEV and Rayleigh best-fit probability distributions, respectively.

Figure 12

Fig. 13. Fabric Schmidt plots at various shear strain increments (polar equal-area projection). The number of grains analyzed is >100 for each increment. The center of the diagrams coincides with the mold long axis. U and L stand for deformation in the upper (εx(U)) and lower (εx(L)) mold section, respectively. The inner circle represents the 45° dip delineation.