Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-9prln Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-11T02:04:36.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Provision of undergraduate otorhinolaryngology teaching within General Medical Council approved UK medical schools: what is current practice?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2012

M M Khan  and
S R Saeed
M M Khan*
Affiliation:
Manchester Royal Infirmary/The University of Manchester School of Medicine, Manchester, UK
S R Saeed
Affiliation:
The UCL Ear Institute, Royal National Throat, Nose & Ear Hospital, 330 Gray's Inn Road, London, WC1X 8DA
*
Address for correspondence: Dr M M Khan, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sharoe Green Lane, Preston PR2 9HT, UK E-mail: maha.khan@doctors.org.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

Despite longstanding concern, provision of undergraduate ENT teaching has not improved in response to the aims of the UK General Medical Council's initiative Tomorrow's Doctors. Previous studies have demonstrated poor representation of ENT within the undergraduate curriculum. We aimed to identify current practice in order to establish undergraduate ENT experience across UK medical schools, a timely endeavour in light of the General Medical Council's new 2011–2013 education strategy.

Method:

Questionnaires were sent to ENT consultants, medical school deans and students. All schools with a clinical curriculum were anonymously represented. Our outcome measures were the provision of mandatory or optional ENT placements, and their duration and content.

Results:

A compulsory ENT placement was available to over half (53 per cent) of the students. Ten of the 26 participating schools did not offer an ENT attachment. The mean mandatory placement was 8 days. Overall, 38 per cent of students reported a satisfactory compulsory ENT placement. Most ENT consultants questioned considered that newly qualified doctors were not proficient in managing common ENT problems that did not require specialist referral.

Conclusions:

Little improvement in the provision of undergraduate ENT teaching was demonstrated. An increase in the proportion of students undertaking ENT training is necessary. Time and curriculum constraints on medical schools mean that optimisation of available resources is required.

Keywords

Education, Medical, UndergraduateOtorhinolaryngologyGreat BritainCurriculum

Information

Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 126 , Issue 4 , April 2012 , pp. 340 - 344
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1Neil, JF.Otolaryngology in the curriculum. J R Soc Med 1979;72:551–2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2NHS Staff 2000–2010 Overview. In: http://www.ic.nhs.uk/statistics-and-data-collections/workforce/nhs-staff-numbers/nhs-staff-2000-2010-overview [April 2011]Google Scholar
3Griffiths, E.Incidence of ENT problems in general practice. J R Soc Med 1979;72:740–2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Donnelly, MJ, Quraishi, MS, McShane, DP.ENT and general practice: a study of paediatric ENT problems seen in general practice and recommendations for general practitioner training in ENT in Ireland. Ir J Med Sci 1995;164:209–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Clamp, PJ, Gunasekaran, S, Pothier, DD, Sunders, MW.ENT in general practice: training, experience and referral rates. J Laryngol Otol 2007;121:580–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6General Medical Council. GMC Educational Strategy 2011–2013. London: GMC, 2010Google Scholar
7Mace, AD, Narula, AA.Survey of current undergraduate otolaryngology training in the United Kingdom. J Laryngol Otol 2004;118:217–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Lee, MSW, Montague, M-L, Hussain, SSM.Student-perceived benefit from otolaryngology theatre attendance. J Laryngol Otol 2006;119:293–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Lund, VJ.Otolaryngology in the curriculum – 10 years on: discussion paper. J R Soc Med 1990;83:377–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Sharma, A, Machen, K, Clarke, B, Howard, D.Is undergraduate otorhinolaryngology teaching relevant to junior doctors working in accident and emergency departments? J Laryngol Otol 2006;120:949–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Ranta, M, Hussain, SSM, Gardiner, Q.Factors that inform the career choice of medical students: implications for otolaryngology. J Laryngol Otol 2002;116:839–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Gul, YA, Wan, AL, Darzi, A.Telemedicine in undergraduate teaching of surgery. J Telemed Telecare 1999;5:246–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed