Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-4lrz4 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2026-03-26T11:32:56.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Exploring reverse silicate weathering across geological time: a review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2025

Andre Baldermann*
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Geosciences, Graz University of Technology and NAWI Graz Geocenter, Graz, Austria
Santanu Banerjee
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India
Stefan C. Löhr
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Adelaide, Engineering North, North Terrace Campus, Adelaide, SA, Australia
Maxim Rudmin
Affiliation:
Division for Geology, School of Earth Sciences & Engineering, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia
Laurence N. Warr
Affiliation:
Institute of Geography and Geology, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
Arpita Chakraborty
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India
*
Corresponding author: Andre Baldermann; Email: baldermann@tugraz.at
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Marine clay mineral authigenesis, referred to as reverse (silicate) weathering, is one of the first-order controls on seawater pH through the generation of acidity and thus plays a significant role in controlling carbon cycling between marine sediments, oceans and the atmosphere over geological timescales. Reverse weathering is mainly regulated by the rates of silicate and carbonate weathering on the continents, the reactivity of detritus supplied to the oceans and the rates of seafloor weathering. These processes provide essential dissolved components (e.g. K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Si(OH)4, Al3+, Fe2+/3+) to the marine porewater inventory that cause authigenic clay minerals, such as odinite, glauconite, celadonite and greenalite, to form close to the sediment–seawater interface. Such clay mineral reactions impact the sedimentary cycling versus sequestration of chemical elements, importantly Si, Fe, Mg and K, and consequently contribute to the fluctuations in climate and seawater composition recorded in marine archives over geological time. This review explores the links between reverse silicate weathering and the climate system across geological timescales and provides estimates of the elemental uptake fluxes associated with modern-day clay mineral authigenesis. Novel isotope proxies (e.g. δ41K and δ30Si) and promising new dating techniques (e.g. in situ Rb/Sr geochronology) provide improved constraints on the timing, kinetics and environmental significance of clay mineral reactions on the ocean floor. We also consider recent geoengineering developments linked to reverse weathering reactions, such as ongoing attempts to reduce atmospheric CO2 concentrations via marine alkalinity enhancement and the application of marine clay mineral-based slow-release fertilizers to soils to optimize nutrient availability.

Information

Type
Review Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of the United Kingdom and Ireland.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Illustration showing selected sedimentary environments characterized by authigenic clay mineral formation. Common clay mineral assemblages forming in each depocentre are indicated at the top right. The yellow meandering strands indicate deltas and subaquatic channels. International Mineralogical Association (IMA)-approved clay minerals abbreviations after Warr (2020): Alp = allophane; Bei = beidellite; Brh = berthierine; Cel = celadonite; Chl = chlorite; Chl-Sme = chlorite-smectite; Chm = chamosite; Glt = glauconite; Gre = greenalite; Hsg = hisingerite; Ilt = illite; Ilt-Sme = illite-smectite; Imo = imogolite; Kln = kaolinite; Mns = minnesotaite; Non = nontronite; Odn = odinite; Plg = palygorskite; Sap = saponite; Sep = sepiolite; Sme = smectite; Stp = stilpnomelane; Stv = stevensite; Tlc = talc; Vrm = vermiculite.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Illustration showing the complex interplay between terrestrial (silicate) weathering, marine bioproductivity, reverse weathering reactions, ocean biogeochemistry and atmospheric circulation, which all contribute to Earth’s climatic evolution (after Isson & Planavsky, 2018). The yellow meandering strands indicate deltas and subaquatic channels.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Illustration of the interaction of clay minerals, silicate weathering and atmospheric CO2 levels. (1) Formation of continental surface clay mineral deposits and weathered crusts consumes CO2 and slows down rock alteration; (2) organic–clay minerals complexation fixes carbon and passes it into the oceans; (3) clay mineral buffers aid carbonate mineral precipitation in the marine environment; (4) reverse weathering and clay mineral precipitation occur on the seafloor, releasing CO2; and (5) the release of water and volatiles from clay minerals during subduction enhances crustal melting and volcanism (Warr, 2022, with minor modifications).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Regional response of pedogenic carbonate oxygen isotope (δ18Ocarbonate) geochemistry and silicate-based CIA associated with Cenozoic climate change in the Valley of Lakes, Mongolia (source: Baldermann et al., 2021). Note the high sensitivity of the study site to regional and global climatic variability during this time, which is expressed as a higher abundance of detrital illite (Ilt) versus authigenic illite-smectite (Ilt-Sme) in periods of increased physical versus chemical weathering (see scanning electron microscopy images on the left). Oi-1a/b = Oi-1a/b glaciation (∼34–33 Myr); EOA = early Oligocene aridification (∼31 Myr); OGM = Oligocene glacial maximum (∼28 Myr); LOW = late Oligocene warming (∼25 Myr); Mi-1 = Mi-1 glaciation (∼23 Myr). Aqu = Aquitanian; Bar = Bartonian; Bur = Burdigalian; Cha = Chattian; Lan = Langhian; Lut = Lutetian; Pri = Priabonian; Rup = Rupelian; Ser = Serravallian; V-PDB = Vienna Peedee Belemnite; Ypr = Ypresian.

Figure 4

Figure 5. (a) Relationship between the evolution of marine siliceous organisms, the dissolved Si concentration in the ocean (data source: Conley et al., 2017) and the abundance of glauconite in the geological record (data source: Banerjee et al., 2016) from the early Precambrian to the present. The glauconite abundance (in %) is expressed by the logarithm of the actual number of occurrences in different intervals divided by the time duration. The sedimentation and early diagenetic re-mineralization of biogenic opal probably provided porewater Si(OH)4 favouring clay mineral authigenesis. (b) Photomicrograph showing authigenic greenalite (Gre; marked with white arrow) embedded in a greyish chert and reddish hematite matrix from the Late Archean Kushtagi-Hungund Schist Belt (India). (c) Artificially coloured scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy mineral map displaying authigenic saponite (Sap) hosted in a blueish dolomite matrix from the Ediacaran Doushantuo Formation (China). (d) Photomicrograph showing glauconite (Glt; marked with white arrow) growing in foraminiferous ooze in Pleistocene–Holocene-aged Ivory Coast–Ghana Marginal Ridge sediments. Images (b)–(d) are provided by AB.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Temporal distribution of authigenic clay minerals found in different sedimentary environments across geological time. The occurrence of authigenic clay minerals is provided in Table S1; however, the nature of kaolinite is disputed – it can be of detrital or authigenic origin. Note that glauconite is the most abundant authigenic clay mineral across time, whereas chamosite is particularly abundant in the Palaeozoic.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Stratigraphic distribution of common clay minerals found in various sedimentary environments. Kaolinite is not shown because the great majority of kaolinite occurrences are considered to be of detrital rather than marine authigenic origin. The numbers at the top represent the numbers of published occurrences of specific authigenic clay minerals provided in Table S1.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Transmission electron microscopy and scanning electron microscopy images of common authigenic clay minerals formed during reverse weathering across geological time. (a) Fibrous berthierine (Bth) crystals (∼7 Å) infilling ooids (inset image) from the Oligocene channel ironstones of the Lisakovsk deposit in Kazakhstan (Rudmin et al., 2021). (b) Lath-like celadonite (Cel) particles occurring in interstitial and void spaces in green bole beds (inset image) within the Late Cretaceous Deccan Volcanic Province in India. This Cel formed in a non-marine environment, but it otherwise precipitated under submarine conditions (Singh et al., 2022). (c) Microcrystalline chamosite (Chm) and siderite (Sd) spar from the Middle Triassic Kremikovtsi Sedimentary Exhalative Siderite Iron Formation in Bulgaria (Damyanov & Vassileva, 2001). (d) Lath-like glauconite (Glt) infilling foraminifera tests (inset image) at the Ivory Coast basin close to the Ghana continental margin (Baldermann et al., 2013). (e) Fibrous greenalite (Gre) crystals in polygon-shaped quartz (Qz) grains from the Proterozoic-aged Brockman Iron Formation in Australia (Rasmussen et al., 2021). (f) Honeycomb-like saponite (Sap) aggregates covering the surface of altered basalt grains (Voigt et al., 2020). Coloured stars in the low-resolution images indicate the positions of regions of interest used for high-resolution imaging.

Figure 8

Figure 9. Illustration showing potential environmental geochemical and isotopic proxies recorded in glauconite and surrounding sediments. Red text indicates primary proxies of high significance; blue text indicates secondary proxies of lower significance (i.e. these are often influenced by other environmental controls and therefore difficult to interpret). Ap = apatite; Dol = dolomite; Ilt = illite.

Figure 9

Figure 10. (a) Field-scale (carbonate) alkalinity enhancement test site situated in the pioneer vegetation zone of salt marshes in Portugal. (b) Illustration showing mineral reactions and element transfer at the interface between (1) seawater and substrate (deployment: reactive mafic rock rich in olivine), (2) substrate and biologically active top layer and (3) top layer and marsh sediments. Olivine dissolution consumes CO2 and liberates carbonate alkalinity and elements, causing smectite formation. (c) Evolution of the alkalinity profiles in sediment porewater with time at control sites without deployments (marked by the geogenic background curve with a low alkalinity) and at deployment sites (marked by the green curve with a ∼2.5-fold higher alkalinity due to enhanced olivine weathering). Note that the deployment sites approach the geogenic background alkalinity level in a relatively short timeframe, which suggests that reverse weathering takes place (i.e. CO2 release).

Supplementary material: File

Baldermann et al. supplementary material

Baldermann et al. supplementary material
Download Baldermann et al. supplementary material(File)
File 845.5 KB