Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:05:09.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quality of life in patients with mastoid cavities dependent on aural care using COMQ12 - a disease specific PROM

Presenting Author: Codruta Neumann

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2016

Codruta Neumann ,
Alison Liu  and
Toby Vishom
Codruta Neumann
Affiliation:
East Kent Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Alison Liu
Affiliation:
Kings College London Medical School
Toby Vishom
Affiliation:
William Harvey Hospital, Ashford
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Abstracts
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 130 , Supplement S3: Abstracts for the 10th International Conference on Cholesteatoma , May 2016 , pp. S213
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2016 

Learning Objectives: To ascertain the impact of having a mastoid cavity requiring regular aural care in a nurse led clinic on quality of life. This study higlights the need for using PROM in assessing QOL in this population in order to inform decision making when offering revision surgery.

Introduction: Patients with mastoid cavities dependent on aural care experience a significant disruption of their life. We aimed to assess patient reported health and quality of life (QOL) following surgery for Chronic Otitis Media (COM) using a disease specific patient related outcome measure questionnaire along with a generic QOL instrument.

Methods: Patients post surgical treatment of chronic otitis media for mucosal disease or cholesteatoma were recruited from nurse led clinics. All patients had mastoid cavities and no procedure to reduce or obliterate the cavity was undertaken at the time of primary or revision surgery. COMQ12 (chronic ear disease disease specific QOL) and Short Form 36 (SF36) questionnaires were adminstered.

Results: COMQ12 mean score was 14, median 13 (LQ6, UQ21), and range 2–31.SF36 scores were calculated for 8 domains, scored out of 100. Physical Functioning mean = 71 (median = 90, LQ = 35, UQ = 100); Physical role limitation mean = 63 (median = 100, LQ = 25, UQ = 100); Emotional role limitation mean = 79 (median = 100, LQ = 67, UQ = 100); Energy mean = 57 (median = 55, LQ = 50, UQ = 70); Emotional wellbeing mean = 75 (median = 80, LQ = 68, UQ = 92); Social function mean = 80 (median 100, LQ = 63, UQ = 100); Pain mean = 74 (median = 90, LQ = 33, UQ = 100); General health mean = 51 (median = 62.5, LQ = 33, UQ = 62.5).

Conclusions: On COMQ12 the most troublesome ear specific symptoms were difficulty in hearing in background noise and the TV, discharge and tinnitus. The frequency of symptoms impacted mainly on time of work and need for medication. On SF36 energy showed least variation, with most patients affected to some degree. Patients generally had good emotional wellbeing, social function, and had little pain. Physical functioning and role limitation scored high, with more variability.