Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-v2srd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-18T17:03:41.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feedback to first language learners: the role of repetitions and clarification questions*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

M. J. Demetras ,
Kathryn Nolan Post  and
Catherine E. Snow
M. J. Demetras
Affiliation:
The University of Arizona
Kathryn Nolan Post
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Catherine E. Snow
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The conclusion that information regarding the grammatically of children's speech is unavailable in parental input has recently been challenged (Moerk 1983 a, b, Hirsh-Pasek, Treiman & Schneiderman 1984). The present study expanded on this research by broadening the definition of ‘negative feedback’ and by describing individual styles of mother–child dialogues. The purpose was to investigate whether mothers of four 2-year-old children responded differentially to their children's well-formed or ill-formed utterances with explicit and implicit feedback. The middle-class, English-speaking, mother–child dyads were recorded in a naturalistic context at home during play and eating activities. Explicit and implicit feedback were different in terms of the proportion of responses available to the child and their relation to well-formed and ill-formed utterances. The style of response was similar for most analyses across the four mothers.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 1986 , pp. 275 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. & Hanlon, C. (1970). Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech. In Hayes, J. (ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cherry, L. (in press). The role of adult's requests for clarification in the language development of children. In Freedle, R. (ed.), Discourse processing: a multidisciplinary approach, Vol. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Furrow, D., Nelson, K. & Benedict, H. (1979). Mothers' speech to children and syntactic development: some simple relationships. JChLang 6. 423–42.Google ScholarPubMed
Garvey, C. (1979). Contingent queries and their relations in discourse. In Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B. (eds), Developmental pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L., Newport, E. & Gleitman, H. (1984). The current status of the motherese hypothesis. JChLang 11. 43–79.Google ScholarPubMed
Hakuta, K. (1985). Let's ride another horse: Hakuta replies to Berwick and Wexler. ContPsych 30. 249.Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Treiman, R. & Schneiderman, M. (1984). Brown and Hanlon revisited: mother's sensitivity to ungrammatical forms. JChLang 11. 81–8.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). A functional approach to child language. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. & Chalkley, M. (1981). The internal language of children's syntax: the ontogenesis and representation of syntactic categories. In Nelson, K. (ed.), Children's language, Vol. 2. New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
Moerk, E. (1983 a). A behavioural analysis of controversial topics in first language acquisition: reinforcements, corrections, modeling, input frequencies, and the three-term contingency. JPsycholingRes 12. 129–55.Google Scholar
Moerk, E. (1983 b). The mother of Eve – as a first language teacher. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. E., Carskaddon, G. & Bonvillian, J. (1973). Syntax acquisition: impact of experimental variation in adult verbal interaction with the child. ChDev 44. 497–504.Google Scholar
Olsen-Fulero, L. (1982). Style and stability in mother conversational behaviour: a study of individual differences. JChLang 9. 543–64.Google ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S. (1979). Formal models of language learning. Cognition 7. 217–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shatz, M. & Gelman, R. (1973). The development of communication skills: modification in the speech of young children as a function of listener. MonogSocResChDev 38. No. 152.Google ScholarPubMed
Snow, C. E. (1977). Mother's speech research: from input to interaction. In Snow, C. E. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds.), Talking to children: language input and acquisition. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Wexler, K. & Culicover, P. (1980). Formal principles of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar