Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-lfk5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-17T22:24:41.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards the characterization and validation of alcohol use disorder subtypes: integrating consumption and symptom data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2013

K. M. Jackson ,
K. K. Bucholz ,
P. K. Wood ,
D. Steinley ,
J. D. Grant  and
K. J. Sher
K. M. Jackson*
Affiliation:
Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
K. K. Bucholz
Affiliation:
Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA Midwest Alcoholism Research Center
P. K. Wood
Affiliation:
Midwest Alcoholism Research Center University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO, USA
D. Steinley
Affiliation:
Midwest Alcoholism Research Center University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO, USA
J. D. Grant
Affiliation:
Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA Midwest Alcoholism Research Center
K. J. Sher
Affiliation:
Midwest Alcoholism Research Center University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO, USA
*
* Address for correspondence: K. M. Jackson, Ph.D., Brown University, Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Box G-S121-4, Providence, RI 02912, USA. (Email: kristina_jackson@brown.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

There is evidence that measures of alcohol consumption, dependence and abuse are valid indicators of qualitatively different subtypes of alcohol involvement yet also fall along a continuum. The present study attempts to resolve the extent to which variations in alcohol involvement reflect a difference in kind versus a difference in degree.

Method

Data were taken from the 2001–2002 National Epidemiologic Survey of Alcohol and Related Conditions. The sample (51% male; 72% white/non-Hispanic) included respondents reporting past 12-month drinking at both waves (wave 1: n = 33644; wave 2: n = 25186). We compared factor mixture models (FMMs), a hybrid of common factor analysis (FA) and latent class analysis (LCA), against FA and LCA models using past 12-month alcohol use disorder (AUD) criteria and five indicators of alcohol consumption reflecting frequency and heaviness of drinking.

Results

Model comparison revealed that the best-fitting model at wave 1 was a one-factor four-class FMM, with classes primarily varying across dependence and consumption indices. The model was replicated using wave 2 data, and validated against AUD and dependence diagnoses. Class stability from waves 1 to 2 was moderate, with greatest agreement for the infrequent drinking class. Within-class associations in the underlying latent factor also revealed modest agreement over time.

Conclusions

There is evidence that alcohol involvement can be considered both categorical and continuous, with responses reduced to four patterns that quantitatively vary along a single dimension. Nosologists may consider hybrid approaches involving groups that vary in pattern of consumption and dependence symptomatology as well as variation of severity within group.

Keywords

Alcoholcategoricalconsumptiondependencetypology

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , January 2014 , pp. 143 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

APA (1980). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edn. American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
APA (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn, revised. American Psychological Association: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Babor, TF, Hofmann, M, DelBoca, FK, Hesselbrock, VM, Hesselbrock, V, Meyer, RE, Dolinsky, ZS, Rounsaville, B (1992). Types of alcoholics: I. Evidence for an empirically derived typology based on indicators of vulnerability and severity. Archives of General Psychiatry 49, 599–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baillie, AJ, Teesson, M (2010). Continuous, categorical and mixture models of DSM-IV alcohol and cannabis use disorders in the Australian community. Addiction 105, 1246–1253.Google Scholar
Bartholomew, DJ (1987). Latent Variable Models and Factor Analysis. Griffin: London.Google Scholar
Bauer, DJ, Curran, PJ (2003). Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: implications for over-extraction of latent trajectory classes. Psychological Methods 8, 338–363.Google Scholar
Beseler, CL, Taylor, LA, Leeman, RF (2010). An item-response theory analysis of DSM-IV Alcohol-Use Disorder criteria and ‘binge’ drinking in undergraduates. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 71, 418–423.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, A (1968). Some latent trait models. In Statistical Theory of Mental Test Scores (ed. Lord, F. M. and Norvick, M. R.), pp. 397–472. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.Google Scholar
Borges, G, Ye, Y, Bond, J, Cherpitel, CJ, Cremonte, M, Moskalewicz, J, Swiatkiewicz, G, Rubio-Stipec, M (2010). The dimensionality of alcohol use disorders and alcohol consumption in a cross-national perspective. Addiction 105, 240–254.Google Scholar
Bucholz, KK, Heath, AC, Reich, T, Hesselbrock, VM, Kramer, JR, Nurnberger, JI Jr., Schuckit, MA (1996). Can we subtype alcoholism? A latent class analysis of data from relatives of alcoholics in a multicenter family study of alcoholism. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research 20, 1462–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, SB, Wood, PK, Heath, A (2009). Decomposing group differences of latent means of ordered categorical variables with the genetic factor model. Behavior Genetics 39, 101–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chung, T, Martin, CS (2001). Classification and course of alcohol problems among adolescents in addictions treatment programs. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research 25, 1734–1742.Google Scholar
Chung, T, Martin, CS (2005). What were they thinking? Adolescents’ interpretations of DSM-IV alcohol dependence symptom queries and implications for diagnostic validity. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 80, 191–200.Google Scholar
Clark, SL, Muthén, B, Kaprio, J, D'Onofrio, BM, Viken, R, Rose, RJ, Smalley, SL (2009). Models and strategies for factor mixture analysis: two examples concerning the structure underlying psychological disorders (http://www.statmodel.com/download/FMA%20Paper_v142.pdf). Accessed 31 August 2011.Google Scholar
Cloninger, CR (1987). A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants. Archives of General Psychiatry 44, 573–588.Google Scholar
Cloninger, CR, Bohman, M, Sigvardsson, S (1981). Inheritance of alcohol abuse: cross-fostering analysis of adopted men. Archives of General Psychiatry 38, 861–869.Google Scholar
Cudeck, R, MacCallum, RC (eds.) (2007). Factor Analysis at 100: Historical Developments and Future Directions. Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
de Bruijn, C, van den Brink, W, de Graaf, R, Vollebergh, WAM (2006). The three year course of alcohol use disorders in the general population: DSM-IV, ICD-10 and the Craving Withdrawal Model. Addiction 101, 385–392.Google Scholar
Edens, EL, Glowinski, AL, Grazier, KL, Bucholz, KK (2008). The 14-year course of alcoholism in a community sample: do men and women differ? Drug and Alcohol Dependence 93, 1–11.Google Scholar
Gillespie, NA, Neale, MC, Legrand, LN, Iacono, WG, McGue, M (2012). Are the symptoms of cannabis use disorder best accounted for by dimensional, categorical, or factor mixture models? A comparison of male and female young adults. Psychology of Addictive Behavior 26, 68–77.Google Scholar
Grant, BF, Dawson, DA, Hasin, DS (2001). The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule–DSM-IV Version (AUDADIS-IV). National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism: Bethesda.Google Scholar
Grant, BF, Moore, TC, Kaplan, KD (2003). Source and Accuracy Statement: Wave 1 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism: Bethesda.Google Scholar
Hasin, DS, Beseler, CL (2009). Dimensionality of lifetime alcohol abuse, dependence and binge drinking. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 101, 53–61.Google Scholar
Heath, AC, Bucholz, KK, Slutske, WS, Madden, PAF, Dinwiddie, SH, Dunne, MP (1994). The assessment of alcoholism in surveys of the general community: what are we measuring? Some insights from the Australian twin panel interview survey. International Review of Psychiatry 6, 295–307.Google Scholar
Jackson, KM, O'Neill, SE, Sher, KJ (2006). Characterizing alcohol dependence: transitions during young and middle adulthood. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 14, 228–244.Google Scholar
Jellinek, EM (1960). The Disease Concept of Alcoholism. Hillhouse: New Haven.Google Scholar
Kahler, CW, Hoeppner, BB, Jackson, KM (2009). A Rasch model analysis of alcohol consumption and problems across adolescence and young adulthood. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research 33, 663–673.Google Scholar
Kahler, CW, Strong, DR (2006). A Rasch model analysis of DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence items in the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 30, 1165–1175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahler, CW, Strong, DR, Papandonatos, GD, Colby, SM, Clark, MA, Boergers, J, Niaura, R, Abrams, DB, Buka, SL (2008). Cigarette smoking and the lifetime alcohol involvement continuum. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 93, 111–120.Google Scholar
Keyes, KM, Geier, T, Brant, BF, Hasin, DS (2009). Influence of a drinking quantity and frequency measure on the prevalence and demographic correlates of DSM-IV alcohol dependence. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 33, 761–771.Google Scholar
Knight, RP (1937). The dynamics and treatment of chronic alcohol addiction. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic 1, 233–250.Google Scholar
Koob, GF, Le Moal, M (2008). Addiction and the brain antireward system. Annual Review of Psychology 59, 29–53.Google Scholar
Kraemer, HC, Kupfer, DJ, Narrow, WE, Clarke, DE, Regier, DA (2010). Moving toward DSM-5: the field trials. American Journal of Psychiatry 167, 1158–1160.Google Scholar
Krueger, RF, Nichol, PE, Hicks, BM, Markon, KE, Patrick, CJ, Iacono, WG, McGue, M (2004). Using latent trait modeling to conceptualize an alcohol problems continuum. Psychological Assessment 16, 107–119.Google Scholar
Kuo, PH, Aggen, SH, Prescott, CA, Kendler, KS, Neale, MC (2008). Using a factor mixture modeling approach in alcohol dependence in a general population sample. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 98, 105–114.Google Scholar
Langenbucher, J, Martin, CS, Labouvie, E, Sanjuan, P, Bavly, L, Pollock, NK (2000). Toward the DSM-V: the withdrawal-gate model versus the DSM-IV in the diagnosis of alcohol abuse and dependence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 68, 799–809.Google Scholar
Langenbucher, JW, Labouvie, E, Martin, CS, Sanjuan, PM, Bavly, L, Kirisci, L, Chung, T (2004). An application of item response theory analysis to alcohol, cannabis, and cocaine criteria in DSM-IV. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 113, 72–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, T-K, Hewitt, BG, Grant, BF (2007). Is there a future for quantifying drinking in the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of alcohol use disorders? Alcohol 42, 57–63.Google Scholar
Lo, Y, Mendell, N, Rubin, DB (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika 88, 767–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubke, GH, Muthén, B (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods 10, 21–39.Google Scholar
Martin, CS, Chung, T, Langenbucher, JW (2008). How should we revise diagnostic criteria for substance use disorders in DSM-V? Journal of Abnormal Psychology 117, 561–575.Google Scholar
Masyn, KE, Henderson, CE, Greenbaum, PE (2010). Exploring the latent structures of psychological constructs in social development using the dimensional–categorical spectrum. Social Development 19, 470–493.Google Scholar
McBride, O, Teesson, M, Baillie, A, Slade, T (2011). Assessing the dimensionality of lifetime DSM-IV alcohol use disorders and a quantity–frequency alcohol use criterion in the Australian population: a factor mixture modelling approach. Alcohol and Alcoholism 46, 333–341.Google Scholar
McCutcheon, AL (1987). Latent Class Analysis. SAGE Publications: Newbury Park.Google Scholar
Millsap, RE, Yun-Tein, J (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research 39, 479–515.Google Scholar
Morey, LC, Blashfield, RK (1981). Empirical classifications of alcoholism: a review. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 42, 925–937.Google Scholar
Moss, HB, Chen, CM, Yi, HY (2010). Prospective follow-up of empirically derived alcohol dependence subtypes in wave 2 of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC): recovery status, alcohol use disorders and diagnostic criteria, alcohol consumption behavior, health status, and treatment seeking. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research 34, 1073–1083.Google Scholar
Muthén, BO (2006). Should substance use disorders be considered as categorical or dimensional? Addiction 101 (Suppl. 1), 6–16.Google Scholar
Muthén, B, Asparouhov, T (2006). Item response mixture modeling: application to tobacco dependence criteria. Addictive Behaviors 31, 1050–1066.Google Scholar
Muthén, LK, Muthén, BO (1998–2010). Mplus User's Guide, 6th edn. Muthén and Muthén: Los Angeles.Google Scholar
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (2005). Helping Patients Who Drink Too Much: A Clinician's Guide, NIH Publication no. 07–3769. NIAAA Publications: Bethesda.Google Scholar
O'Brien, C (2011). Addiction and dependence in DSM-V. Addiction 106, 866–867.Google Scholar
O'Neill, SE, Sher, KJ (2000). Physiological alcohol dependence symptoms in early adulthood: a longitudinal perspective. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 8, 493–508.Google Scholar
Proudfoot, H, Baillie, AJ, Teesson, M (2006). The structure of alcohol dependence in the community. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 81, 21–26.Google Scholar
Rasch, G (1960). Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Denmarks Paedagogiske Institut: Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Robinson, TE, Berridge, KC (2001). Incentive-sensitization and addiction. Addiction 96, 103–114.Google Scholar
Robinson, TE, Berridge, KC (2004). Incentive-sensitization and drug ‘wanting’. Psychopharmacology 171, 352–353.Google Scholar
Sacco, P, Bucholz, KK, Spitznagel, EL (2009). Alcohol use among older adults in the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions: a latent class analysis. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 70, 829–838.Google Scholar
Saha, TD, Chou, SP, Grant, BF (2006). Toward an alcohol use disorder continuum using item response theory: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Psychological Medicine 36, 931–941.Google Scholar
Saha, TD, Stinson, FS, Grant, BF (2007). The role of alcohol consumption in future classifications of alcohol use disorders. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 89, 82–92.Google Scholar
Schmitt, TA (2011). Current methodological considerations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 29, 304–321.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics 6, 461–464.Google Scholar
Sher, KJ, Wolf, ST, Martinez, JA (2009). How can etiological research inform the distinction between normal drinking and disordered drinking? In Handbook of Drug Use Etiology (ed. Scheier, L. M.), pp. 225–246. American Psychological Association: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Spitzer, RL (1999). Harmful dysfunction and the DSM definition of mental disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 108, 430–432.Google Scholar
Stacy, AW, Wiers, RW (2010). Implicit cognition and addiction: a tool for explaining paradoxical behavior. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 6, 551–575.Google Scholar
Steinley, D, Brusco, MJ (2011). Evaluating mixture modeling for clustering: recommendations and cautions. Psychological Methods 16, 63–79.Google Scholar
US Department of Agriculture & US Department of Health and Human Services (2010). Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010, 7th edn. US Government Printing Office: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
US Department of Health and Human Services (2010). Tracking Healthy People 2010. US Government Printing Office: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Vergés, A, Jackson, KM, Bucholz, K, Grant, JD, Trull, TJ, Wood, PK, Sher, KJ (2012). Deconstructing the age-prevalence curve of alcohol use disorders: why ‘maturing out’ is only a small piece of the puzzle. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 121, 511–523.Google Scholar
Vergés, A, Steinley, D, Trull, TJ, Sher, KJ (2010). It's the algorithm! Why differential rates of chronicity and comorbidity are not evidence for the validity of the abuse–dependence distinction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 119, 650–661.Google Scholar
Wakefield, JC (1992). Disorder as harmful dysfunction: a conceptual critique of DSM-III-R's definition of mental disorder. Psychological Review 99, 232–247.Google Scholar
Wechsler, H, Austin, SB (1998). Binge drinking: the five/four measure. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 59, 122–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, BD, Masters, GN (1982). Rating Scale Analysis. MESA: Chicago.Google Scholar
Wu, LT, Woody, GE, Yang, C, Pan, JJ, Blazer, DG (2011). Abuse and dependence on prescription opioids in adults: a mixture categorical and dimensional approach to diagnostic classification. Psychological Medicine 41, 653–664.Google Scholar
Zucker, RA (1987). The four alcoholisms: a developmental account of the etiologic process. In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1986: Alcohol and Addictive Behavior (ed. Rivers, P. C.), pp. 27–83. University of Nebraska Press: Lincoln.Google Scholar