Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-tq7bh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T04:53:45.659Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Eclipse drill: A field-portable intermediate-depth ice-coring drill

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Erik W. Blake
Affiliation:
Icefield Instruments Inc., PO Box 5567, Whitehorse, Yukon Y1A 5H4, Canada
Cameron P. Wake
Affiliation:
Climate Change Research Center, Institute of the Study of the Earth, Oceans and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824, U.S.A.
Michael D. Gerasimoff
Affiliation:
Icefield Instruments Inc., PO Box 5567, Whitehorse, Yukon Y1A 5H4, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A derivative of the Danish tipping-lower intermediate-depth ice-coring drill system has been developed for use in remote areas. The system as described is capable of drilling to depths of 250 m, although the drill has been proven to 350 m. The drill system is designed to be transported by hand and consumes 700 W maximum power from a 24 V Ac. battery bank charged by solar panels or a small generator. A field test in the St Elias Mountains, Yukon, produced good-quality core to 161.6 m depth; drilling at 6500 m a.s.l. on Far East Rongbuk Glacier, Mount Everest, produced good core to 42 m depth.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1998
Figure 0

Fig. 1. A perspective view of the lightweight cross-braced winch. The hand crank (not shown), winch drum and winch motor are mounted on the two diagonal braces. The hinged tower (not shown) is mounted at the top of the two L sections.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. A side view of the drill, showing the tower and drill in both horizontal and vertical (drilling) positions. The anti-torque section of the drill is visible at the top. In the horizontal position, a slight downward angle is maintained to facilitate removal of the inner barrel.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Drill advance and cumulative core recovery vs trip number for the July 1996 field test.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Core length vs drill depth for the July 1996 field test.