No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Mutualism: a model for managing risk in P2P sharing
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 October 2024
Abstract
This article explores how the risk structure currently adopted by the sharing economy, in particular the highly formalised and contrived systems of contract constructed by platforms, is largely constituted by the rules of property law. This effectively ties sharing activities to the old model of private property and its accompanying boundaries of privatised risk and value and undermines the efforts of collaboration to supersede those boundaries through peer-to-peer co-production of value. This article aims towards presenting an alternative model of risk distribution for the sharing economy that is more reflective of its collaborative nature. To this end, I will draw on ideas from commons and mutualism and propose the possibility of creative use of contracts to stipulate positive duties and obligations between collaborative partners as a device to construct a collective and/or mutual risk system.
Information
- Type
- Article
- Information
- International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 20 , Special Issue 4: Property in the Sharing Economy: Paradox, Disruption, and Institutional Design , December 2024 , pp. 476 - 495
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Albrecht, P and Huggenberger, M (2017) The fundamental theorem of mutual insurance. Insurance, Mathematics & Economics 75, 180–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansari, S, Wijen, F and Gray, B (2013) Constructing a climate change logic: An institutional perspective on the ‘Tragedy of the Commons’. Organization Science 24, 1014–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnott, RJ and Stiglitz, JE (1988) The basic analytics of moral hazard. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 90, 383–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ault, W (2006). Open-Field Farming in Medieval Europe: A Study of Village By-laws, 1st edn. Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berke, D (2016) Products liability in the sharing economy. Yale Journal on Regulation 33, 603–653.Google Scholar
Bettini, F (2016) The rise of community land trusts in Europe. Available at https://labgov.city/theurbanmedialab/the-rise-of-community-land-trust-in-europe/ (accessed 15 November 2023).Google Scholar
Birchall, J (2010) People-Centred Businesses: Co-Operatives, Mutuals and the Idea of Membership. Book, Whole. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9780230295292
Google Scholar
Botsman, R and Rogers, R (2011) What’s Mine Is Yours: How Collaborative Consumption Is Changing the Way We Live. New York: Collins.Google Scholar
Bradley, K and Pargman, D (2017) The sharing economy as the commons of the 21st century. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society 10, 231–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
By Rotation (nd) Terms. Available at www.byrotation.com/terms (accessed 15 November 2023).Google Scholar
Claeys, ER (2014) Productive use in Acquisition, Accession, and Labour Theory. In Penner, JE and Smith, HE (eds), Philosophical Foundations of Property Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cobb, C (2016) Ecological and Georgist economic principles: A comparison. In Farley, J and Malghan, D (eds), Beyond Uneconomic Growth. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Cohen, GA (1995) Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, DH, Epstein, G and Mcginnis, MD (2014) Digging deeper into Hardin’s pasture: The complex institutional structure of ‘the tragedy of the commons’. Journal of Institutional Economics 10, 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, JD, Weiss, MA and Zi, H (1999) Organizational form and efficiency: The coexistence of stock and mutual property-liability insurers. Management Science 45, 1254–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daston, L (1988) Classical Probability in the Enlightenment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekking, FM, Kraaikamp, C, Lopuhaä, HP et al (2005) The law of large numbers. In Dekking, FM, Kraaikamp, C, Lopuhaä, HP, et al (eds), A Modern Introduction to Probability and Statistics: Understanding Why and How. London: Springer, 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demsetz, H (1967) Toward a theory of property rights. The American Economic Review 57, 347–359. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1821637
Google Scholar
Evans, DS (2003) The antitrust economics of multi-sided platform markets. Yale Journal on Regulation 20, 325.Google Scholar
Evans, DS and Schmalensee, R (2016) Matchmakers: The New Economics of Multisided Platforms. London: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, M and Chuang, J (2005) Overcoming free-riding behavior in peer-to-peer systems. SIGecom Exchanges 5, 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getaround (nd) Insurance. Available at https://getaround-assets.gumlet.io/legal/2022-12-22/1_Getaround-UK-Apollo-Third-Party-Motor-Liability-and-Damage-xs-GBP-5K-Certificate-of-Motor-Insurance_22-12-22.pdf (accessed 15 November 2023).Google Scholar
Giaccotto, C, Lin, X and Zhao, Y (2020) Term structure of discount rates for firms in the insurance industry. Insurance, Mathematics and Economics 95, 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, RJ and Pitts, SM (eds) (2012) Short term risk models. In Risk Modelling in General Insurance: From Principles to Practice (International Series on Actuarial Science). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 90–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunter, U (2018) What makes an Airbnb host a superhost? Empirical evidence from San Francisco and the Bay Area. Tourism Management 66, 26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, SL and Mooney, CW (1994) A property-based theory of security interests: Taking debtors ’ choices seriously. Virginia Law Review 80, 2021–2072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, J (2006) The benefits of cooperation. Philosophy and Public Affairs 34, 313–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinsohn, G and Steiger, O (2013) Ownership Economics: On the Foundations of Interest, Money, Markets, Business Cycles and Economic Development. Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohfeld, WN and Cook, WW (1978) Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning. Book, Whole. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/wesley-hohfeld-a-century-later/some-fundamental-legal-conceptions-as-applied-in-judicial-reasoning/B4545D9FEE968E4B9FEA49C248683FAA
Google Scholar
Honore, AM (1961) Ownership. In Guest, AG (ed), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hopkin, P (2018) Fundamentals of Risk Management: Understanding, Evaluating and Implementing Effective Risk Management, 5th edn. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Huurne, M, Ronteltap, A, Corten, R et al (2017) Antecedents of trust in the sharing economy: A systematic review. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 16, 485–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, KT (2016) Economy of mutuality: Merging financial and social sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 133, 499–517. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24703718
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassim, ZAM (2012) The primary insurance models. In Gönülal SO (ed), Takaful and Mutual Insurance. Directions in Development –
Finance. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 21–30.Google Scholar
Kreiczer-Levy, S (2024) Property and use in the access economy. International Journal of Law in Context 20.Google Scholar
Kochan, DJ (2017) ‘I Share, Therefore It’s Mine’. University of Richmond Law Review 51, 909.Google Scholar
Labaeye, A (2019) Sharing cities and commoning: An alternative narrative for just and sustainable cities. Sustainability 11, 4358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeuwen, MHD (2016) Mutual insurance 1550–2015: From guild welfare and friendly societies to contemporary micro-insurers. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/continuity-and-change/article/abs/marco-h-d-van-leeuwen-mutual-insurance-15502015-from-guild-welfare-and-friendly-societies-to-contemporary-microinsurers-london-and-new-york-palgrave-2016-pages-xiii-321-including-figures-3-tables-40-75-hardback-7150-ebook/CFB5DA3759BB7C971609E5B22A0846E9
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Library of Things (nd) Terms of borrowing. Available at https://www.libraryofthings.co.uk/terms-of-borrowing (accessed 15 November 2023).Google Scholar
Locke, J (1690) Two Treatises of Government: Second Treatise, An Essay Concerning the True Original Extent, and End of Civil Government. London: Awnsham Churchill.Google Scholar
Love Home Swap (nd) Terms and conditions. Available at https://www.lovehomeswap.com/terms-and-conditions (accessed 15 November 2023).Google Scholar
Martin, CJ (2016) The sharing economy: A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism? Ecological Economics 121, 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McArthur, E (2015) Many-to-many exchange without money: Why people share their resources. Consumption Markets & Culture 18, 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPeak, AA (2016) Sharing tort liability in the new sharing economy. Connecticut Law Review 49, 171.Google Scholar
Merrill, TW and Smith, HE (2001) The property/contract interface. Columbia Law Review 101, 773–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miceli, TJ (1997) Economics of the Law: Torts, Contracts, Property, Litigation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mol, JM, Botzen, WJW and Blasch, JE (2020) Behavioral motivations for self-insurance under different disaster risk insurance schemes. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 180, 967–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, H, Wei, W and Miao, L (2019) Complaints and resolutions in a peer-to-peer business model. International Journal of Hospitality Management 81, 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, B and Kuch, D (2015) Radical transactionalism: Legal consciousness, diverse economies, and the sharing economy. Journal of Law and Society 42, 556–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, B and Kuch, D (2020) Diverse legalities: pluralism and instrumentalism. In: The Handbook of Diverse Economies. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. Available at: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781788119955/9781788119955.00047.xml
Google Scholar
Morgan, B (2024) Institutional design in commons-based sharing economies: Platform, care and place. International Journal of Law in Context 20.Google Scholar
Odierno, HS, Kassim, ZAM and Gonulal, SO (2012) Challenges for Takaful going forward. In Gönülal SO (ed), Takaful and Mutual Insurance. Directions in Development –
Finance. Washington DC: The World Bank, 129–142.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, RA (2014) Economic Analysis of Law, 9th edn. New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.Google Scholar
Rejda, GE (2011) Principles of Risk Management and Insurance, 11th edn. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
Rothstein, H, Huber, M and Gaskell, G (2006) A theory of risk colonization: The spiralling regulatory logics of societal and institutional risk. Economy and Society 35, 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saccani, N, Perona, M and Bacchetti, A (2017) The total cost of ownership of durable consumer goods: A conceptual model and an empirical application. International Journal of Production Economics 183, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.09.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schor, JB, Fitzmaurice, C, Carfagna, LB et al (2016) Paradoxes of openness and distinction in the sharing economy. Poetics 54, 66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shed, Share (nd) Terms and conditions. Available at https://www.shareshed.org.uk/terms-and-conditions/ (accessed 15 November 2023).Google Scholar
Sheehan, D (2017) The Principles of Personal Property Law, 2nd edn. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Sheffi, N (2020) We Accept: The Constitution of Airbnb. Transnational Legal Theory 11, 484–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, HE (2002) Exclusion versus governance: Two strategies for delineating property rights. The Journal of Legal Studies 31, 453–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srnicek, N (2017) The challenges of platform capitalism: Understanding the logic of a new business model. Juncture 23, 254–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lend, Style. Terms of service. Available at https://www.stylelend.com/terms (accessed 15 November 2023).Google Scholar
Takasaki, Y (2011) Do the commons help augment mutual insurance among the poor? World Development 39, 429–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, T, Hawlitschek, F and Dann, D (2017) Price determinants on Airbnb: How reputation pays off in the sharing economy. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics 5, 53–80.Google Scholar
Traum, AB (2016) Sharing risk in the sharing economy: Insurance regulation in the age of Uber. Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal 14, 511–544.Google Scholar
Turo (nd) Insurance. Available at https://help.turo.com/en_us/detailed-explanation-of-protection-plans-or-uk-hosts-B16_INxV5 (accessed 15 November 2023).Google Scholar
Turo (nd) Terms of service. Available at https://turo.com/us/en/policies/terms (accessed 15 November 2023).Google Scholar
Vazquez, CG (2020) The sharing revolution: Changing times call for clarifying tort liability. Louisiana Law Review 80, 623.Google Scholar
Wallenstein, J and Shelat, U (2017) What’s next for the sharing economy? Available at https://www.bcg.com/publications/2017/strategy-technology-digital-whats-next-for-sharing-economy (accessed 15 November 2023).Google Scholar
Weber, TA (2014) Intermediation in a sharing economy: Insurance, moral hazard, and rent extraction. Journal of Management Information Systems 31, 35–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinrib, EJ and Oxford University Press (2013) The Idea of Private Law. Rev. Book, Whole. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/book/4099?login=false
Google Scholar
Zhu, S (2023) Collaborative property: P2P sharing as property system. In Bettini, F, Fischer, M, Charles Mitchell, KC, et al. (eds), New Directions in Private Law Theory. London: University College London Press.Google Scholar