Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-8p85h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-16T04:44:28.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Unravelling the complex sub-ice geology of the Wilkes Subglacial Basin region of East Antarctica from marine sediment provenance analyses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2023

Mayuri Pandey
Affiliation:
Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India
Naresh Chandra Pant*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
Devsamridhi Arora
Affiliation:
National Centre of Experimental Mineralogy and Petrology, University of Allahabad, Allahabad, India
Fausto Ferraccioli
Affiliation:
National Institute of Oceanography and Applied Geophysics - OGS, Sgonico (TS), Italy
Rashmi Gupta
Affiliation:
Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India
Sonalika Joshi
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of India, Jaipur, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Deciphering the sub-ice geology in the Wilkes Subglacial Basin region is important for understanding solid earth-ice sheet evolution and for assessing geological ties between East Antarctica and formerly contiguous Australia. We analyse marine sediment samples derived from drill site U1359 of Integrated Oceanic Drilling Program Expedition 318. Our study reports for the first time that the inland sediment source area comprises a complex mafic igneous terrain and a metamorphosed Precambrian subglacial basement. Pyroxene geochemical analyses confirm the presence of tholeiitic to calc-alkaline basalts. The high-grade part of the subglacial terrain contains upper amphibolite to granulite facies rocks that are comparable to Archaean to Palaeoproterozoic rocks exposed in the Terre Adélie Craton and the formerly adjacent Gawler Craton in Australia. Chemical Th-U-total Pb isochron method (CHIME) ages extracted from a subhedral monazite grain associated with the low-grade biotite-muscovite schist rock fragment provide a unimodal age of 799 ± 13 Ma. Rare occurrences of 800 Ma age in the Terre Adélie Craton and/or George V Coast provide evidence for the presence of at least one late Neoproterozoic magmato-metamorphic event in the interior of Wilkes Land. The affinity of the unexposed geological domains of Wilkes Land, East Antarctica, with their Australian counterparts is discussed in the context of the Rodinia supercontinent.

Information

Type
Earth Sciences
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antarctic Science Ltd
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Geological map of exposed bedrock around East Antarctica in proximity to Wilkes Land (inferred by Ferraccioli et al.2009, Cook et al.2013) displayed over a subglacial bedrock topography map (from Bedmap2; Fretwell et al.2013) to indicate probable sediment provenance areas for the sediments we investigated at site U1359 of Integrated Oceanic Drilling Program Expedition 318. CB = Central Basin; EB = Eastern Basin; MSZ = Mertz Shear Zone; WB = Western Basin.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. A composite lithology of site U1359 (modified after Tauxe et al.2012) along with age constraints based on magnetostratigraphy and biostratigraphy. Lithostratigraphic units IIc and III representing Miocene sediments of the studied cores are also mentioned. The lithostratigraphic units are based on the observed change in facies association. WL-U7 and WL-U6 are two seismic unconformities. Locations of samples selected for the present work are shown at different depths. FOT = first occurrence of Thalassiosira inura (Tauxe et al.2012); GPTS = geomagnetic polarity timescale; mcd = measured compensated depth.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. a. Selected back-scattered electron images of metamorphic minerals observed at various depths. Green dots represent the positions of electron probe micro-analyser point analyses of respective grains. A. Fused texture of two different sub-calcic amphiboles, indicating the metamorphic nature of these minerals. B. Diopside of metamorphic affinity. C. Smooth grain boundaries of zircon, indicating a metamorphic origin. D. Subhedral grains of pyrope and augite with smooth and equilibrated grain boundaries, indicating a metamorphic origin. E. Detrital biotite grain. F. Tourmaline and chlorite. b. Selected back-scattered electron images of igneous minerals observed at various depths. Green dots represent the locations of spot analyses in the respective grains. A. Anhedral grain of pigeonite and calcic plagioclase. B. Orthopyroxene of igneous origin associated with plagioclase. C. Detrital grains of apatite, titanite and orthopyroxene. D. Phenocryst of augite coexisting with plagioclase. E. Dissociated orthopyroxene grain; the outer texture of the grain indicates the effects of hydrothermal activity. F. Anhedral altered grain of pigeonite.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Classification diagrams of pyroxene a. after Morimoto et al. (1988), showing plots of detrital pyroxene of site U1359. The abundance of augite and pigeonite is clearly visible. Isotherms are plotted to explain the stability temperature field for the formation of pigeonites and augite ranging from 800°C to 1200°C (Lindsley & Andersen 1983). b. Plot of Al2O3vs FeO + MgO for distinguishing between igneous and metamorphic orthopyroxenes from the heavy fraction of U1359 (fields after Rietmeijer et al.1983). Opx = orthopyroxene.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Discrimination diagrams of Leterrier et al. (1982) for clinopyroxenes present in the heavy media of sediments of site U1359: a. Ti vs Na + Ca (in atoms per formula unit); b. Ti vs Al (in atoms per formula unit).

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Composition plots of calcic amphiboles from the sediments of site U1359 on the classification diagram devised by Leake et al. (1997). a. (Na + K)A ≥ 0.5, showing the dominance of actinolite and magnesio-hornblende. b. (Na + K)A < 0.5, showing the dominance of edenite and pargasite. c. Composition of calcic amphiboles from the sediments of site U1359 on the Alvivs Aliv discrimination graph of Leake (1965).

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Classification of garnet, biotite and feldspar. a. Subdivision of garnet in the Fe + MFn-Mg-Ca ternary plot devised by Mange & Morton (2007), showing the presence of type A, B and C classes of garnet in the detrital sediments of site U1359. b. Classification of biotite based on the Fe/(Fe + Mg) vs Al content. Grey circles represent biotite data from the present study while black circles represent the biotite data published in Pant et al. (2013). c. Ternary phase diagram of the feldspars obtained from Greenwood & Earnshaw (1998). Diamonds represent the feldspars present in the sediments of site U1359, which are associated with the pyroxenes and amphiboles.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Various selected rock fragments. a. Representative of rock fragments collected from various depths of site U1359 in the left inlet and back-scattered electron image of the igneous-origin rock fragment 1 (RF-1) with clinopyroxene (cpx) and anorthite (an) identified as major phases and sphene present as an accessory phase. b. Back-scattered electron image of RF-2: muscovite-biotite schist (green dot represents the location of spot analyses carried out by electron probe micro-analyser). The presence of schistosity confirms its metamorphic origin. c. Back-scattered electron image of RF-3: garnet biotite schist represented by a porphyroblast of garnet with inclusions of biotite and quartz.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. a. Back-scattered electron image of monazite present in rock fragment 2 extracted from heavy mineral fractions at of depth 230–233 measured compensated depth marked with ages. b, Frequency diagram and weighted average of the age obtained from monazite. c. Weighted average indicates 799 ± 25 Ma. d. CHIME age extracted from the monazite grain, indicating an isochron age of 810 ± 20 Ma. CHIME = chemical Th-U-total Pb isochron method; MSWD = mean square of weighted deviation.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Reconstructed map of geology and linkage of Australia and East Antarctica. a. The base map of Australia is from Gerner et al. (2010) and that of East Antarctica is from An et al. (2015), made using Quantarctica (Matsuoka et al.2021). The Centralian Superbasin and its constituent basins in South Australia are inferred from Walter et al. (1995). Geologies of Adélie Land and North Victoria Land are as reported by Ménot et al. (2007) and Weaver et al. (1984), respectively. Locations of subglacial Eastern Basin (EB), Central Basin (CB) and Western Basin (WB) are from Ferraccioli et al. (2009). The probable area of extension of the Gairdner Dyke Swarm is shown by blue dashed lines in the interior of the Wilkes Subglacial Basin. b. Known geology of the study area overlaid on the ADMAP-2 aeromagnetic anomaly map (modified from Cook et al.2013, Aitken et al.2014, Golynsky et al.2018). MSZ = Mertz Shear Zone.

Supplementary material: File

Pandey et al. supplementary material

Pandey et al. supplementary material

Download Pandey et al. supplementary material(File)
File 309.1 KB