Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-45ctf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-18T21:40:16.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Questionable validity of ‘dissociative amnesia’ in trauma victims

Evidence from prospective studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Harrison G. Pope Jr
Affiliation:
Biological Psychiatry Laboratory, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, and Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
James I. Hudson
Affiliation:
Biological Psychiatry Laboratory, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, and Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
J. Alexander Bodkin
Affiliation:
Biological Psychiatry Laboratory, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, and Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Paul Oliva
Affiliation:
Biological Psychiatry Laboratory, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, and Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Abstract

Background

We reviewed evidence from prospective studies to test whether individuals can develop amnesia for traumatic experiences, a process variously termed ‘repression’, dissociative amnesia’ or ‘psychogenic amnesia’.

Method

Using specified criteria, we selected and analysed studies which prospectively assessed memory in victims of documented traumatic experiences.

Results

In studies in which people were asked directly about a past traumatic experience, they consistently reported memories. Non-reporting occurred only in studies where subjects were not asked directly about the experience. This latter design leaves open the well-documented possibility that subjects simply did not disclose events that they actually remembered. Some prospective studies were also limited by incomplete documentation of trauma and failure to rule out other more ordinary causes of amnesia.

Conclusions

Prospective data as yet fail to demonstrate that individuals can develop dissociative amnesia for traumatic events.

Information

Type
Review Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

This journal is not currently accepting new eletters.

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.