Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-n8gtw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T11:27:39.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stimulating annuity markets*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2016

BEN J. HEIJDRA ,
JOCHEN O. MIERAU  and
TIMO TRIMBORN
BEN J. HEIJDRA
Affiliation:
Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, CESifo, Netspar, Groningen, The Netherlands
JOCHEN O. MIERAU
Affiliation:
Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Netspar, Groningen, The Netherlands
TIMO TRIMBORN
Affiliation:
Vienna University of Technology, Institute of Statistics and Mathematical Methods in Economics, Vienna, Austria (e-mail: timo.trimborn@tuwien.ac.at)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study the short-, medium-, and long-run implications of stimulating annuity markets in a dynamic general-equilibrium overlapping-generations model. We find that beneficial partial-equilibrium effects of stimulating annuity markets are counteracted by negative general-equilibrium repercussions. Balancing the positive partial-equilibrium and negative general-equilibrium forces we show that there exists an intermediate level of annuitization such that the lifetime utility of steady-state agents is maximized. Studying the transition to this optimal degree of annuitization shows that currently middle-aged individuals stand to gain most from the stimulation of annuity markets. Complementing our main analysis, we highlight the centrality of the interplay between human-capital accumulation and annuity market policy.

Keywords

C68D91J14H55Individual welfareannuity marketscomputable general equilibriumoverlapping generations

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Pension Economics & Finance , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 2017 , pp. 554 - 583
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

We thank the editor, David Love, and two anonymous referees for useful comments and suggestions. We also thank Fabian Kindermann, Laurie Reijnders and seminar participants at the Universities of New South Wales, Nuremberg, Göttingen, and Würzburg as well at the Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory, the Netherlands Economists Day, and the Paris Overlapping Generations Workshop for helpful comments and suggestions. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

Adjemian, S., Bastani, H., Juillard, M., Mihoubi, F., Perendia, G., Ratto, M., and Villemot, S. (2011) Dynare: reference manual, version 4. Dynare Working Papers 1, CEPREMAP.Google Scholar
Ben-Porath, Y. (1967) The production of human capital and the life cycle of earnings. Journal of Political Economy, 75: 352–365.Google Scholar
Bruce, N. and Turnovsky, S. J. (2013) Social security, growth, and welfare in overlapping generations economies with or without annuities. Journal of Public Economics, 101: 12–24.Google Scholar
Bütler, M. (2001) Neoclassical life-cycle consumption: a textbook example. Economic Theory, 17: 209–221.Google Scholar
Caliendo, F. N., Guob, N. L., and Hosseini, R. (2014) Social security is NOT a substitute for annuity markets. Review of Economic Dynamics, 17: 739–755.Google Scholar
Davidoff, T., Brown, J. R., and Diamond, P. A. (2005) Annuities and individual welfare. American Economic Review, 95: 1573–1590.Google Scholar
Fehr, H. and Habermann, C. (2008) Welfare effects of life annuities: some clarifications. Economics Letters, 99: 177–180.Google Scholar
Fehr, H. and Habermann, C. (2010) Private retirement savings and mandatory annuitization. International Tax and Public Finance, 17: 640–661.Google Scholar
Feigenbaum, J., Gahramanov, E., and Tang, X. (2013) Is it really good to annuitize? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 93: 116–140.Google Scholar
Girosi, F. and King, G. (2008) Demographic Forecasting. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, G. D. (1993) The cyclical and secular behaviour of the labour input: comparing efficiency units and hours worked. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 8: 71–80.Google Scholar
Hansen, G. D. and İmrohoroğlu, S. (2008) Consumption over the life cycle: the role of annuities. Review of Economic Dynamics, 11: 566–583.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. J. (1976) A life-cycle model of earnings, learning, and consumption. Journal of Political Economy, 84: S11–S44.Google Scholar
Heijdra, B. J. and Mierau, J. O. (2012) The individual life-cycle, annuity market imperfection and economic growth. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 36: 876–890.Google Scholar
Heijdra, B. J. and Reijnders, L. S. M. (2012) Human capital accumulation and the macroeconomy in an ageing society. Working Paper 4046, CESifo, München.Google Scholar
Heijdra, B. J., Mierau, J. O., and Reijnders, L. S. M. (2014) A tragedy of annuitization? Longevity insurance in general equilibrium. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 18: 1607–1634.Google Scholar
Imai, S. and Keane, M. P. (2004) Intertemporal labor supply and human capital accumulation. International Economic Review, 45: 601–641.Google Scholar
İmrohoroğlu, A., İmrohoroğlu, S., and Joines, D. H. (1995) A life cycle analysis of social security. Economic Theory, 6: 83–114.Google Scholar
Inkmann, J., Lopes, P., and Michaelides, A. (2011) How deep is the annuity market participation puzzle? Review of Financial Studies, 24: 279–319.Google Scholar
Kim, D. and Lee, C.-I. (2007) On-the-job human capital accumulation in a real business cycle model: implications for intertemporal substitution elasticity and labor hoarding. Review of Economic Dynamics, 10: 494–518.Google Scholar
Lee, R. D. and Carter, L. R. (1992) Modeling and forecasting U.S. mortality. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87: 659–671.Google Scholar
Lockwood, L. (2012) Bequest motives and the annuity puzzle. Review of Economic Dynamics, 15: 226–243.Google Scholar
Lotka, A. (1998) Analytical Theory of Biological Populations. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Ludwig, A., Schelkle, T., and Vogel, E. (2012) Demographic change, human capital and welfare. Review of Economic Dynamics, 15: 94–107.Google Scholar
Mierau, J. O. and Turnovsky, S. J. (2014) Capital accumulation and the sources of demographic change. Journal of Population Economics, 27(3): 857–894.Google Scholar
OECD (2012) Pensions at a Glance. Paris: Organization for Economic Coordination and Development.Google Scholar
Pashchenko, S. (2013) Accounting for non-annuitization. Journal of Public Economics, 98: 53–67.Google Scholar
Pecchenino, R. A. and Pollard, P. S. (1997) The effects of annuities, bequests, and aging in an overlapping generations model with endogenous growth. Economic Journal, 107: 26–46.Google Scholar
Strulik, H. and Vollmer, S. (2013) Long-run trends of human aging and longevity. Journal of Population Economics, 26(4): 1303–1323.Google Scholar
Trabandt, M. and Uhlig, H. (2011) The Laffer curve revisited. Journal of Monetary Economics, 58: 305–327.Google Scholar
Yaari, M. E. (1965) Uncertain lifetime, life insurance, and the theory of the consumer. Review of Economic Studies, 32: 137–150.Google Scholar