Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-z2ts4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T10:10:38.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rheological properties of magnesium bentonite and sepiolite suspensions after dynamic ageing at high temperatures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2024

Georgios E. Christidis*
Affiliation:
Technical University of Crete, School of Mineral Resources Engineering, 73100 Chania, Greece
Nikolaos Athanasakis
Affiliation:
KU Leuven, Department of Material Science, Arenberg, Belgium
Dimitrios Marinakis
Affiliation:
University of Western Macedonia, Department of Mineral Resources Engineering, Kozani, Greece
*
Corresponding author: Georgios E. Christidis; Email: gchristidis@tuc.gr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The rheological properties of three Na-activated, trioctahedral Mg-bentonites (hectorite clay from the CMS Source Clay Project repository, saponite clay from Spain and stevensite clay from Rhassoul, Morocco) and a sepiolite clay from Greece were examined after dynamic ageing at temperatures up to 230°C. The 5% w/v suspensions were prepared by dispersing the clay mineral samples in distilled water. The suspensions underwent dynamic, thermal ageing for 16 h before determination of the viscosity, filtration loss, filter cake thickness and pH and the concentration of dissolved Na+ and Mg2+. Thermal ageing contributed to the dispersion of clay particles, with a direct effect on plastic and apparent viscosity, introducing pseudoplastic behaviour. With the exception of the stevensite clay at 230°C that displayed limited dissolution at 230°C and partial conversion to kerolite, the clays were stable at high temperatures. The Na-activation of all clays except for stevensite was not adversely affected by thermal ageing. Thermal ageing of stevensite at 230°C facilitated Na exchange and yielded suspension with high viscosity and low filtrate loss. Only the suspensions of hectorite and those of stevensite aged at 230°C met with American Petroleum Institute specifications. The thermal behaviour and rheological properties of the clays might be interpreted according to the intrinsic properties of the clay minerals, such as layer charge and charge distribution.

Information

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that no alterations are made and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use and/or adaptation of the article.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of the United Kingdom and Ireland
Figure 0

Table 1. Sample notation and origins of clay mineral samples used in this study.

Figure 1

Table 2. Mineralogical composition of the clays (wt.%).

Figure 2

Figure 1. XRD traces of the trioctahedral clays. (a) Original materials and (b) materials after thermal ageing at 230°C. The green arrow indicates a ~10.5 Å phase in stevensite and the red arrow indicates a 12.7 Å component in saponite. See text for discussion. Ab = albite; Bru = brucite; Cc = calcite; cps = counts per second; Dol = dolomite; Qz = quartz; Sep = sepiolite; Sme = smectite.

Figure 3

Table 3. Chemical composition and CEC of the studied clays.

Figure 4

Figure 2. Thermal analysis of the studied clays. (a) TG curves; (b) DTG curves.

Figure 5

Figure 3. Rheograms of the clay suspensions aged at different temperatures. (a) hectorite; (b) saponite; (c) stevensite; (d) sepiolite.

Figure 6

Figure 4. (a) AV and (b) PV of the suspensions as a function of temperature.

Figure 7

Table 4. PV, AV and YP of the suspensions (PV = Φ600 – Φ300, AV = Φ600/2) determined according to API 13A specifications (API 13A, 2010).

Figure 8

Figure 5. YP of the examined suspensions after ageing at various temperatures. The dashed lines indicate the minimum and maximum YP values (in Pa) accepted by API 13A (2010).

Figure 9

Table 5. pH measurements of the suspensions after 16 h of hydration (25°C) or thermal ageing.

Figure 10

Figure 6. (a) Evolution of the pH of the suspensions with temperature and (b) evolution of PV with pH.

Figure 11

Figure 7. (a) Filtration loss of the suspensions and (b) thickness of the filter cakes after ageing at various temperatures. The dashed line in (a) indicates the maximum acceptable filtrate loss according to API 13A (2010).

Figure 12

Figure 8. Filtrate loss vs filter cake thickness of the suspensions aged at various temperatures. The arrow for each clay mineral indicates the direction of increasing ageing temperature. The dashed line indicates the maximum acceptable filtrate loss according to API 13A (2010).

Figure 13

Table 6. Concentrations of Na+ and Mg2+ cations (ppm) in the filtrates at various ageing temperatures. The values in parentheses are the amounts of Na+ and Mg2+ in meq.

Figure 14

Figure 9. pH vs Mg content of the suspension filtrates after ageing at various temperatures.