Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-r6c6k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T14:56:04.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Development and implementation of the Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention Scoring Tool at a single pediatric institution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2024

Ann L. Wirtz*
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri, Kansas, MO, USA
Alaina N. Burns
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacy, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri, Kansas, MO, USA
Elizabeth Monsees
Affiliation:
Performance Excellence, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri, Kansas, MO, USA University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri, Kansas, MO, USA
Brian R. Lee
Affiliation:
University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri, Kansas, MO, USA Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri, Kansas, MO, USA
Joshua C. Herigon
Affiliation:
University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri, Kansas, MO, USA Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Children’s Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri, Kansas, MO, USA
*
Corresponding author: Ann L. Wirtz; Email: alwirtz@cmh.edu

Abstract

Objective:

The primary objective was to grade the potential impact of antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) interventions on patient safety at a single center using a newly developed scoring tool, the Antimicrobial Stewardship Impact Scoring Tool (ASIST).

Design:

Retrospective descriptive study.

Setting:

A 367-bed free-standing, pediatric academic medical center.

Methods:

The ASP team developed the ASIST which scored each intervention on an impact level (low, moderate, high) based on patient harm avoidance and degree of antibiotic optimization. Intervention frequency and characteristics were collected between May 1, 2022 and October 31, 2023. Intervention rates per impact level were calculated monthly.

Results:

The ASP team made 1024 interventions further classified as low (45.1%), moderate (47%), and high impact (7.9%). The interventions for general pediatrics (53.9%) and those to modify formulation (62.2%), dose/frequency (58.1%), and duration (57.5%) were frequently low impact. Hematology/oncology (12.5%), sub-specialty (11.7%), and surgical services (11.3%) had the greatest rate of high-impact interventions. Interventions to broaden antibiotics (40.8%) and those associated with antibiotics used to treat bacteremia (20.6%) were frequently classified as high-impact.

Conclusion:

The ASIST is an effective tool to link ASP interventions to prevention of antimicrobial-associated patient harm. For our ASP team, it provided meaningful data to present to hospital leadership and identified opportunities to prevent future harm and reduce ASP team workload.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Supplementary material: File

Wirtz et al. supplementary material 1

Wirtz et al. supplementary material
Download Wirtz et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 23.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wirtz et al. supplementary material 2

Wirtz et al. supplementary material
Download Wirtz et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 22.1 KB