Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-75d7c8f48-c28dw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-13T14:02:25.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Health and Disease

Experimental Philosophy of Medicine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2026

Somogy Varga
Affiliation:
Aarhus University
Andrew James Latham
Affiliation:
Aarhus University
Edouard Machery
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh

Summary

The concepts of health and disease are fundamental to medical research, healthcare, and public health, and philosophers have long sought to clarify their meaning and implications. Increasingly, it is suggested that progress in this area could be advanced by integrating empirical methods with philosophical reflection. This Element explores the emerging field of experimental philosophy of medicine (XPhiMed), which takes this approach by applying empirical methods to longstanding philosophical debates. It begins with an overview of the philosophical debates and their methodological challenges, followed by an exploration of experimental findings on health, disease, and disorder, along with their implications for philosophy and other fields.
Get access

Information

Type
Element
Information
Online ISBN: 9781009673679
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 19 February 2026

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Element purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Bibliography

Amoretti, M. C., & Lalumera, E. (2022). Wherein is the concept of disease normative? From weak normativity to value-conscious naturalism. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 25(1), 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ananth, M. (2008). In defense of an evolutionary concept of health: Nature, norms, and human biology. Ashgate Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Barnes, E. (2023). Health problems: Philosophical puzzles about the nature of health. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaulac, J., Kristjansson, E., & Cummins, S. (2009). A systematic review of food deserts, 1966–2007. Preventing Chronic Disease, 6(3), A105.Google ScholarPubMed
Béghin, G., & Faucher, L. (2023). Does the lay concept of mental disorder necessitate a dysfunction?. In Hens, K. & de Block, A. (Eds.), Advances in experimental philosophy of medicine (pp. 71–96). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Bishop, F., & Yardley, L. (2010). The development and initial validation of a new measure of lay definitions of health: The wellness beliefs scale. Psychology and Health, 25(3), 271–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaxter, M. (1990). Health and lifestyles. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, M. (2010). Health. Polity.Google Scholar
Boorse, C. (1975). On the distinction between disease and illness. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 5, 49–68.Google Scholar
Boorse, C. (1976). What a theory of mental health should be. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 6, 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boorse, C. (1977). Health as a theoretical concept. Philosophy of Science, 44, 542–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boorse, C. (1997). A rebuttal on health. In Humber, J. M. & Almeder, R. F. (Eds.), What is disease? (pp. 3–143). Humana Press.Google Scholar
Boorse, C. (2011). Concepts of health and disease. In Philosophy of medicine (pp. 13–64). North-Holland.Google Scholar
Boorse, C. (2014). A second rebuttal on health. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 39(6), 683–724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braddon-Mitchell, D., Latham, A. J., & Varga, S. (ms). Is there a “folk” concept of dysfunction?Google Scholar
Broadbent, A. (2019). Health as a secondary property. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 70, 609–627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burgess, A., & Plunkett, D. (2013a). Conceptual ethics I. Philosophy Compass, 8(12), 1091–1101.Google Scholar
Burgess, A., & Plunkett, D. (2013b). Conceptual ethics II. Philosophy Compass, 8(12), 1102–1110.Google Scholar
Bushnell, F. K. L., Cook, T. H., Wells, N., & Johnson, R. (2000). The meaning of health to the low-income patients in a primary care center. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 11(3), 267–275.Google Scholar
Buts, J., Baker, M., Luz, S., & Engebretsen, E. (2021). Epistemologies of evidence-based medicine: A plea for corpus-based conceptual research in the medical humanities. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 24(4), 621–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calnan, M. (1987). Health and illness: The lay perspective. Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Calnan, M., & Johnson, B. (1985). Health, health risks and inequalities: An exploratory study of women’s perceptions. Sociology of Health & Illness, 7(1), 55–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, E. J. M., Scadding, J. G., & Roberts, R. S. (1979). The concept of disease. British Medical Journal, 2(6193), 757–762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canguilhem, G. (1966). Le Normal et le pathologique. Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Cappelen, H. (2018). Fixing language: An essay on conceptual engineering. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carel, H. (2007). Can I be ill and happy?. Philosophia, 35(2), 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carel, H. (2008). Illness: The cry of the flesh. Acumen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1962). Logical foundations of probability (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). Disability and health information for people with disabilities, at: www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/people.htmlGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, D. J. (2015). Why isn’t there more progress in philosophy? Philosophy, 90(1), 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, D. J. (2020). What is conceptual engineering and what should it be? Inquiry, 68(9), 2902–2919.Google Scholar
Christie, J. R., Wilkinson, Z., Gawronski, S. A., & Griffiths, P. E. (2023). Concepts of function in biology and biomedicine. In Hens, K. & De Block, A. (Eds.), Advances in experimental philosophy of medicine (pp. 31–50). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. (2002). Disease. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 33(2), 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. (2005). Classifying madness. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. (2016). Health and disease. In Marcum, J. (Ed.), The Bloomsbury companion to contemporary philosophy of medicine (pp. 275–296). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. (2020). The concept of disorder revisited: Robustly value-laden despite change. In Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume (Vol. 94, No. 1, pp. 141–161). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cushman, F., & Mele, A. (2008). Intentional action: Two-and-a-half folk concepts? In Knobe, J. & Nichols, S. (Eds.), Experimental philosophy (pp. 171–188). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
d’Houtaud, A., & Field, M. G. (1984). The image of health: Variations in perception by social class in a French population. Sociology of Health and Illness, 6(1), 30–60.Google Scholar
De Block, A., Dewitte, S., & Hens, K. (2023). Causes or cures: What makes us think of attention issues as disorders? New Ideas in Psychology, 69, article 101008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Block, A., & Hens, K. (2021). A plea for an experimental philosophy of medicine. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 42(3–4), 81–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Block, A., & Hens, K. (2023). Introduction: Whither (experimental) philosophy of medicine?. In Kristien, Hens & Andreas, de Block (Eds.), Advances in experimental philosophy of medicine (pp. 1–10). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
De Block, A., & Sholl, J. (2021). Harmless dysfunctions and the problem of normal variation. In Faucher, L. & Forest, D. (Eds.), Defining mental disorder: Jerome Wakefield and his critics (pp. 495–510). The MIT Press.Google Scholar
De Jong, M. A., Wagemakers, A., & Koelen, M. A. (2020). “We Don’t assume that everyone has the same idea about health, do we?” Explorative study of citizens’ perceptions of health and participation to improve their health in a low socioeconomic city district. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 4958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vreese, L. (2017). How to proceed in the disease concept debate? A pragmatic approach. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 42(4), 424–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeVito, S. (2000). On the value-neutrality of the concepts of health and disease: Unto the breach again. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 25(5), 539–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohle, S., Schreiber, M., Wingen, T., & Baumann, M. (2022). Blaming others for their illness: The influence of health‐related implicit theories on blame and social support. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 52(4), 210–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downey, C. A., & Chang, E. C. (2013). Assessment of everyday beliefs about health: The lay concepts of health inventory, college student version. Psychology and Health, 28(7), 818–832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engelhardt, H. T. Jr (1976). Ideology and etiology. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1(3), 256–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ereshefsky, M. (2009). Defining ‘health’ and ‘disease’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 40(3), 221–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fagerberg, H. (2023). What we argue about when we argue about disease. Philosophy of Medicine, 4(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faucher, L. (2021). Facts, facts, facts: HD analysis goes factual. In Faucher, L. & Forest, D. (Eds.), Defining mental disorders: Jerome Wakefield and his critics (pp. 47–70). The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faucher, L., & Béghin, G. (2023). Experimental philosophy of psychiatry: A survey. In Hens, K. & de Block, A. (Eds.), Advances in experimental philosophy of medicine (pp. 11–30). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Favela, L. H., & Machery, E. (2023). Investigating the concept of representation in the neural and psychological sciences. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1165622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feltz, A., & Cova, F. (2014). Moral responsibility and free will: A meta-analysis. Conscious and Cognition, 30, 234–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fugelli, P., & Ingstad, B. (2001). Health-people’s perspective. Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening: tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke, 121(30), 3600–3604.Google ScholarPubMed
Fulford, K. W. M. (1989). Moral theory and medical practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fulford, K. W. M. (1999). Nine variations and a coda on the theme of an evolutionary definition of dysfunction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 412–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulford, K. W. M., & Colombo, A. (2004). Six models of mental disorder: A study combining linguistic-analytic and empirical methods. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 11(2), 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulford, K. W. M., & Thornton, T. (2007). Fanatical about “harmful dysfunction”. World Psychiatry, 6(3), 161.Google ScholarPubMed
Fuller, J. (2018). What are chronic diseases? Synthese, 196(7), 3197–3220.Google Scholar
Gagné-Julien, A. M. (2021). Dysfunction and the definition of mental disorder in the DSM. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology, 28, 353–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagné-Julien, A. M. (2024). Beyond conceptual analysis: Social objectivity and conceptual engineering to define disease. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, 49(2), 147–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garson, J. (2019). What biological functions are and why they matter. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garson, J., & Piccinini, G. (2014). Functions must be performed at appropriate rates in appropriate situations. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giroux, E. (2016). Introduction. Why a book on naturalism in the philosophy of health?. In Giroux, E. (Ed.), Naturalism in the philosophy of health: Issues and implications (pp. 1–18). Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. I. (2007). Philosophical intuitions: Their target, their source, and their epistemic status. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 74(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goosens, W. K. (1980). Values, health, and medicine. Philosophy of Science, 47(1), 100–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, G. (2010). The disordered mind: An introduction to philosophy of mind and mental illness. Routledge.Google Scholar
Griffiths, P. E., & Matthewson, J. (2018). Evolution, dysfunction, and disease: A reappraisal. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 69, 301–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, P. E., & Stotz, K. (2008). Experimental philosophy of science. Philosophy Compass, 3(3), 507–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, P. E., Machery, E., & Linquist, S. (2009). The vernacular concept of innateness. Mind and Language, 24(5), 605–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrero, J. D. (2010). On a naturalist theory of health: A critique. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 41(3), 272–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunderman, R. (2000). Illness as failure: Blaming patients. Hastings Center Report, 30, 7–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hausman, D. M. (2012). Health, naturalism and functional efficiency. Philosophy of Science, 79, 519–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D. M. (2014). Health and functional efficiency. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, 39(6), 634–647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hausman, D. M. (2015). Valuing health: Well-being, freedom and suffering. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hens, K., & de Block, A. (2023). Introduction: Whither (Experimental) philosophy of medicine?. In Hens, K. & de Block, A. (Eds.), Advances in experimental philosophy of medicine (pp. 1–10). Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzlich, C. (1973). Health and illness. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hesslow, G. (1993). Do we need a concept of disease?. Theoretical Medicine, 14, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiscock, R., Bauld, L., Amos, A., Fidler, J. A., & Munafò, M. (2012). Socioeconomic status and smoking: A review. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1248, 107–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huber, M., Knottnerus, J. A., Green, L., Van Der Horst, H., Jadad, A. R., Kromhout, D., Leonard, B., Lorig, K., Loureiro, M. I., van der Meer, J. W. M., Schnabel, P., Smith, R., van Weel, C., & Smid, H. (2011). How should we define health?. Bmj, 343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huber, M., van Vliet, M., Giezenberg, M., Winkens, B., Heerkens, Y., Dagnelie, P. C., & Knottnerus, J. A. (2016). Towards a ‘patient-centred’operationalisation of the new dynamic concept of health: A mixed methods study. BMJ Open, 6(1), e010091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughner, R. S., & Kleine, S. S. (2004). Views of health in the lay sector: A compilation and review of how individuals think about health. Health, 8(4), 395–422.Google ScholarPubMed
Katz, J., & Fodor, J. (1962). What’s wrong with the philosophy of language?. Inquiry, 5(1–4), 197–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, M. (2005). Limits on patient responsibility. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 30(2), 189–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kingma, E. (2007). What is it to be healthy? Analysis, 67, 128–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kingma, E. (2010). Paracetamol, poison and polio: Why Boorse’s account of function fails to distinguish health and disease. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61, 241–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingma, E. (2014). Naturalism about health and disease: Adding nuance for progress. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 39(6), 590–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingma, E. (2017). Health, disease and naturalism: Hausman on the public value of health. Public Health Ethics, 10(2), 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingma, E. (2019). Contemporary accounts of health. In Adamson, P. (Ed.), Health: A history (pp. 289–318). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, S. A., Wakefield, J. C., Hsieh, D., & Pottick, K. (1999). Social context and social workers’ judgment of mental disorder. Social Service Review, 73(1), 82–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knobe, J. (2003). Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language. Analysis, 63(3), 190–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knobe, J., Buckwalter, W., Nichols, S., Robbins, P., Sarkissian, H., & Sommers, T. (2012). Experimental philosophy. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 81–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohne, A. C. J., de Graauw, L. P., der Maas, R. L., & Os, J. V. (2023). Clinician and patient perspectives on the ontology of mental disorder: A qualitative study. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1081925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kornmesser, S., Bauer, A. M., Alfano, M., Allard, A., Baumgartner, L., Cova, F., Engelhardt, P., Fischer, E., Meyer, H., Reuter, K., Sytsma, J., Thompson, K., & Wyszynski, M. (2024). Experimental philosophy for beginners: A gentle introduction to methods and tools. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraaijeveld, S. R., & Jamrozik, E. (2022). Moralization and mismoralization in public health. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 25(4), 655–669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kukla, Q. R. (2014). Medicalization,“normal function,” and the definition of health. In Arras, J. D., Fenton, E., and Kukla, R. (eds.), The Routledge companion to bioethics (pp. 515–530). Routledge.Google Scholar
Kukla, Q. R. (2019). Infertility, epistemic risk, and disease definitions. Synthese, 196(11), 4409–4428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukla, Q. R. (2022). What counts as a disease, and why does it matter?. The Journal of Philosophy of Disability, 2, 130–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lalumera, E. (2025). Conceptual engineering of medical concepts. In Isaac, M. G., Koch, S., and Scharp, K. (eds), New perspectives on conceptual engineering-Volume 3: Applied Conceptual Engineering (pp. 43–67). Springer Nature Switzerland.Google Scholar
Latham, A. J. (2019). The conceptual impossibility of free will error theory. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 15(2), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemoine, M. (2013). Defining disease beyond conceptual analysis: An analysis of conceptual analysis in philosophy of medicine. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 34, 309–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemoine, M., & Giroux, É. (2016). Is Boorse’s biostatistical theory of health naturalistic?. In Giroux, E. (Ed.). Naturalism in the philosophy of health: Issues and implications (pp. 19–38). Springer.Google Scholar
Lemoine, M., & Okholm, S. (2023). What experimental philosophy of disease should and should not be. In Hens, K. & de Block, A. (Eds.), Advances in experimental philosophy of medicine (pp. 97–110). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K., Latham, A. J., & Varga, S. (2025). A matter of standing: Praise and blame with respect to health. The Journal of Ethics, 29, 663–680.Google Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, K., Latham, A. J., & Varga, S. (ms). Risk, disease, and moral standing to praise and blame.Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. A. (2006). The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution. In The case of the female orgasm. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorente-Rovira, E., Grasa, E., Ochoa, S., Corripio, I., Peláez, T., López-Carrillero, R., Morano-Guillen, M., Gutierrez-Gea, A., Villagran, J. M., Llacer, B. & Sanjuán, J. (2020). Positive and useful voices in patients with schizophrenia: Prevalence, course, characteristics, and correlates. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 208(8), 587–592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Machery, E. (2009). Doing without concepts. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machery, E. (2016). Experimental philosophy of science. In Sytsma, J. & Buckwalter, W. (Eds.), A companion to experimental philosophy (pp. 473–490). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Machery, E. (2017). Philosophy within its proper bounds. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machery, E. (2023). The folk concept of disease. In Hens, K. & de Block, A. (Eds.), Advances in experimental philosophy of medicine (pp. 51–70). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Machery, E. (2025). A new challenge to conceptual engineering. Inquiry, 68(9), 3019–3042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machery, E., Griffiths, P., Linquist, S., & Stotz, K. (2019). Scientists’ concepts of innateness: Evolution or attraction. In Wilkenfeld, D. & Samuels, R. (Eds.), Advances in experimental philosophy of science (pp. 172–201). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Machery, E., Mallon, R., Nichols, S., & Stich, S. P. (2004). Semantics, cross-cultural style. Cognition, 92(3), B1–B12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manne, K. (2025). Unshrinking: How to face fatphobia. Random House.Google Scholar
Matthewson, J., & Griffiths, P. E. (2017). Biological criteria of disease: Four ways of going wrong. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 42(4), 447–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millstein, S. G., & Irwin, C. E. (1987). Concepts of health and illness: Different constructs or variations on a theme?. Health Psychology, 6(6), 515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, P., & Alexandrova, A. (2021). Well-being and pluralism. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(6), 2411–2433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muckler, D., & Taylor, J. S. (2020). The irrelevance of harm for a theory of disease. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 45(3), 332–349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, D. (2006). Psychiatry in the scientific image. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, D. (2021). Concepts of disease and health. In Zalta, Edward N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2021 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/health-disease/.Google Scholar
Nadelhoffer, T., Rose, D., Buckwalter, W., & Nichols, S. (2020). Natural compatibilism, indeterminism, and intrusive metaphysics. Cognitive Science, 44(8), e12873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nado, J. (2021). Conceptual engineering via experimental philosophy. Inquiry, 64(1–2), 76–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, S., & Knobe, J. (2007). Moral responsibility and determinism: The cognitive science of folk intuitions. Nous, 41(4), 663–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordenfelt, L. (1995). On the nature of health: An action-theoretic approach. Springer Science and Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordenfelt, L. (1998). On medicine and health enhancement-towards a conceptual framework. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 1(1), 51–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nordenfelt, L. (2001). On the goals of medicine, health enhancement and social welfare. Health Care Analysis, 9, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nordenfelt, L. (2007). The concepts of health and illness revisited. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 10, 5–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nordenfelt, L. (2017). On concepts of positive health. In Schramme, T. & Edwards, S. (Eds.), Handbook of the philosophy of medicine (pp. 29–43). Springer.Google Scholar
Peersman, W., Cambier, D., De Maeseneer, J., & Willems, S. (2012). Gender, educational and age differences in meanings that underlie global self-rated health. International Journal of Public Health, 57(3), 513–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pottick, K. J., Wakefield, J., Kirk, S., & Tian, X. (2003). Influence of social workers’ characteristics on the perception of mental disorder in youths. Social Service Review, 77(3), 431–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuter, K., Latham, A. J., & Varga, S. (2025). Concept(s) of health: Lifestyle at the heart of modern health. Erkenntnis, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reznek, L. (1987). The nature of disease. Routledge & Kegan.Google Scholar
Richardson, H. S. (2016). Capabilities and the definition of health: Comments on Venkatapuram. Bioethics, 30(1), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ringel, M. M., & Ditto, P. H. (2019). The moralization of obesity. Social Science and Medicine, 237, 112399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schramme, T. (2007). Lennart Nordenfelt’s theory of health: Introduction to the theme. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 10(1), 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schramme, T. (2017). Health as notion in public health. In Schramme, T. & Edwards, S. (Eds.), Handbook of the philosophy of medicine. Springer.Google Scholar
Schramme, T. (2023). Health as complete well-being: The WHO definition and beyond. Public Health Ethics, 16(3), 210–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schupbach, J. N. (2017). Experimental explication. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 94(3), 672–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, P. H. (2007a). Decision and discovery in defining ‘disease’. In Kincaid, H. & McKitrick, J. (Eds.), Establishing medical reality: Essays in the metaphysics and epistemology of biomedical science (pp. 47–63). Springer.Google Scholar
Schwartz, P. H. (2007b). Defining dysfunction: Natural selection, design, and drawing a line. Philosophy of Science, 74(3), 364–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, P. H. (2014). Reframing the disease debate and defending the biostatistical theory. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 39(6), 572–589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, P. H. (2017). Progress in defining disease: Improved approaches and increased impact. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 42, 485–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sholl, J. (2015). Escaping the conceptual analysis Straitjacket: Pathological mechanisms and Canguilhem’s biological philosophy. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 58, 395–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sholl, J., & Rattan, S. I. (2020). How is ‘Health’ explained across the sciences? conclusions and recapitulation. In Sholl, J. & Ratten, S. I. (Eds.), Explaining health across the sciences (pp. 541–549). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, J. G. (2007). Beyond naturalism and normativism: Reconceiving the ‘disease’ debate. Philosophical Papers, 36(3), 343–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, J. G., De Boer, J. B., Joung, I. M., Bosma, H., & Mackenbach, J. P. (2005). How is your health in general? A qualitative study on self-assessed health. The European Journal of Public Health, 15(2), 200–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, B. (2016). Concepts and causes in the philosophy of disease. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegenga, J. (2018). Medical nihilism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steiner, P. M., Atzmüller, C., & Su, D. (2016). Designing valid and reliable vignette experiments for survey research: A case study on the fair gender income gap. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, 7(2), 52–94.Google Scholar
Stich, S. P., & Machery, E. (2023). Demographic differences in philosophical intuition: A reply to Joshua Knobe. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 14(2), 401–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoljar, D. (2017). Philosophical progress: In defence of a reasonable optimism. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stotz, K., & Griffiths, P. (2004). Genes: Philosophical analyses put to the test. History and Philosophy of the Life Science, 26(1), 5–28.Google ScholarPubMed
Stroebe, W. (2011). Social psychology and health. Open University Press.Google Scholar
Stronks, K., Hoeymans, N., Haverkamp, B., Den Hertog, F. R., van Bon-Martens, M. J., Galenkamp, H., Verwei, M., & Van Oers, H. A. (2018). Do conceptualisations of health differ across social strata? A concept mapping study among lay people. BMJ Open, 8(4), e020210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sytsma, J., & Livengood, J. (2015). The theory and practice of experimental philosophy. Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Thorell, A. (2021). Distinguishing health from pathology. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 46(5), 561–585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorell, A. (2024). Health and disease: Between naturalism and normativism. Philosophy of Science, 91(2), 449–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tse, J. S., & Haslam, N. (2023). What is a mental disorder? Evaluating the lay concept of mental ill health in the United States. BMC Psychiatry, 23(1), 224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Heijden, A., Te Molder, H., Jager, G., & Mulder, B. C. (2021). Healthy eating beliefs and the meaning of food in populations with a low socioeconomic position: A scoping review. Appetite, 161, 105135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Linden, R. R., & Schermer, M. H. (2024a). Exploring health and disease concepts in healthcare practice: An empirical philosophy of medicine study. BMC Medical Ethics, 25(1), 38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Linden, R. R., and Schermer, M. H. (2024b). Conceptual engineering health: A historical-philosophical analysis of the concept of positive health. In Schermer, M. and Binney, N. (Eds.), A pragmatic approach to conceptualization of health and disease (pp. 245–268). Springer.Google Scholar
van Heteren, F., Raaphorst, N., Groeneveld, S., & Bussemaker, J. (2023). Professionals’ health conceptions of clients with psychosocial problems: An analysis based on an empirical exploration of semi-structured interviews. International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances, 5, 100120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varga, S. (2020). Epistemic authority, philosophical explication, and the Bio-Statistical Theory of disease. Erkenntnis, 85, 937–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varga, S. (2024). Science, medicine, and the aims of inquiry: A philosophical analysis. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varga, S., & Latham, A. J. (2024a). Is health the absence of disease?. Inquiry 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varga, S., & Latham, A. J. (2024b). What is mental health and disorder? Philosophical implications from lay judgments. Synthese.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varga, S., & Latham, A. J. (2025). Is “Dysfunction” a value-neutral concept?. Philosophical Studies, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varga, S., Latham, A. J., & Machery, E. (2025a). The wicked and the Ill. Philosophical Psychology, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varga, S., Latham, A. J., & Machery, E. (2025b). “They Had It Coming!” The effect of moral character on somatic and mental health judgments. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements.Google Scholar
Varga, S., Latham, A. J., & Machery, E. (2025c). Concepts of health and disease: Insights from experimental philosophy of medicine. Synthese. 1–15 (Online First).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varga, S., Latham, A. J., & Stegenga, J. (2025). Health, disease, and the medicalization of low sexual desire: A vignette-based experimental study. ERGO.Google Scholar
Varga, S., Andersen, M. M., Bueter, A., & Folker, A. P. (2024). Mental health promotion and the positive concept of health: Navigating dilemmas. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 105, 32–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venkatapuram, S. (2011). Health justice: An argument from the capabilities approach. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Venkatapuram, S. (2013). Health, vital goals, and central human capabilities. Bioethics, 27(5), 271–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakefield, J. C. (1992a). The concept of mental disorder: On the bound-ary between biological facts and social values. American Psychologist, 47, 373–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakefield, J. C. (1992b). Disorder as harmful dysfunction: A concep-tual critique of DSM-HI-R’s definition of mental disorder. Psychological Review, 99, 232–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakefield, J. C. (1999). Mental disorder as a black box essentialist concept. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108(3), 465–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakefield, J. C. (2005). On winking at the facts, and losing one’s Hare: Value pluralism and the harmful dysfunction analysis. World Psychiatry, 4(2), 88–89.Google ScholarPubMed
Wakefield, J. C. (2007). The concept of mental disorder: Diagnostic implications of the harmful dysfunction analysis. World Psychiatry, 6(3), 149.Google ScholarPubMed
Wakefield, J. C. (2010). Taking disorder seriously: A critique of psychiatric criteria for mental disorders from the harmful-dysfunction perspective. In Millon, T., Krueger, R. F., & Simonsen, E. (Eds.), Contemporary directions in psychopathology: Scientific foundations of the DSM-V and ICD-11 (pp. 275–300). The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Wakefield, J. C. (2021). Do the empirical facts support the harmful dysfunction analysis? Reply to Luc Faucher. In Faucher, L. & Forest, D. (Eds.), Defining mental disorder: Jerome Wakefield and his critics (pp. 71–96). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wakefield, J. C., & Conrad, J. A. (2020). Harm as a necessary component of the concept of medical disorder: Reply to Muckler and Taylor. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, 45(3), 350–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakefield, J. C., Kirk, S., Pottick, K., & Hsieh, D. (1999). Disorder attribution and clinical judgment in the assessment of adolescent antisocial behavior. Social Work Research, 23(4), 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakefield, J. C., Kirk, S. A., Pottick, K. J., Tian, X., & Hsieh, D. K. (2006). The lay concept of conduct disorder: Do non-professional use syndromal symptoms or internal dysfunction to distinguish disorder from delinquency?. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 51(4), 210–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, M. J., & Rogers, W. A. (2018). A new approach to defining disease. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 43, 402–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westerhof, G. J., & Keyes, C. L. M. (2010). Mental illness and mental health: The two continua model across the lifespan. Journal of Adult Development, 17(2), 110–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, R. (1983). Concepts of health: An analysis of lay logic. Sociology, 17(2), 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization. (1948). Summary Reports on Proceedings Minutes and Final Acts of the International Health Conference. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/85573Google Scholar
Wren-Lewis, S., & Alexandrova, A. (2021). Mental health without well-being. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 46(6), 684–703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The HTML of this element conforms to version 2.0 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic (A) level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.

Visual Accessibility

Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.

Structural and Technical Features

ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Health and Disease
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Health and Disease
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Health and Disease
Available formats
×