Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-lcgwf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-26T06:14:45.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Grooves in forereefs act as transport channels to deliver coral rubble during tropical cyclones

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2025

Ana Vila-Concejo*
Affiliation:
Geocoastal Research Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney Faculty of Science, Australia Marine Studies Institute, The University of Sydney Faculty of Science, Australia
Lachlan A. Perris
Affiliation:
Geocoastal Research Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney Faculty of Science, Australia Marine Studies Institute, The University of Sydney Faculty of Science, Australia
Ana Paula da Silva
Affiliation:
Geocoastal Research Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney Faculty of Science, Australia Marine Studies Institute, The University of Sydney Faculty of Science, Australia
Kate Whitton
Affiliation:
Geocoastal Research Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney Faculty of Science, Australia Marine Studies Institute, The University of Sydney Faculty of Science, Australia
Liav Meoded-Stern
Affiliation:
Geocoastal Research Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney Faculty of Science, Australia Marine Studies Institute, The University of Sydney Faculty of Science, Australia
Wan-Yi Steilberg-Liu
Affiliation:
Geocoastal Research Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney Faculty of Science, Australia Marine Studies Institute, The University of Sydney Faculty of Science, Australia
Ruby Holmes
Affiliation:
One Tree Island Research Station, The University of Sydney Faculty of Science, Australia
Heinrich Breuer
Affiliation:
One Tree Island Research Station, The University of Sydney Faculty of Science, Australia
Maria Byrne
Affiliation:
Marine Studies Institute, The University of Sydney Faculty of Science, Australia Integrative Marine Biology Group, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney Faculty of Science, Australia
Thomas E. Fellowes
Affiliation:
Geocoastal Research Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney Faculty of Science, Australia Marine Studies Institute, The University of Sydney Faculty of Science, Australia Water Research Laboratory, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UNSW Sydney, Manly Vale, NSW 2093, Australia
Tristan Salles
Affiliation:
Geocoastal Research Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney Faculty of Science, Australia Marine Studies Institute, The University of Sydney Faculty of Science, Australia
Bradley D. Morris
Affiliation:
Water, Wetlands and Coasts Science, Science and Insights Division, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, NSW Government, Sydney, Australia
Eleanor Bruce
Affiliation:
Geocoastal Research Group, School of Geosciences, The University of Sydney Faculty of Science, Australia Marine Studies Institute, The University of Sydney Faculty of Science, Australia
*
Corresponding author: Ana Vila-Concejo; Email: ana.vilaconcejo@sydney.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The long-term stability of coral reef islands and associated reef top sedimentary landforms requires the delivery of sediment from the forereef, but the rates and pathways of sediment delivery to these systems remain unclear. Spurs and grooves (SAGs) are ubiquitous geomorphic features fringing coral reefs, characterised by shore-normal coral ridges (spurs) separated by channels (grooves) with either bare substrate or a relatively low sediment infill. SAGs dissipate wave energy, facilitate offshore sediment transport and enhance nutrient exchange. Here we present the first evidence that SAG can also act as channels for onshore transport of rubble during high-energy events, contributing to maintaining reef islands and rubble-based ecosystems.

Information

Type
Rapid Communication
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. (A) Location of One Tree Island on the southern Great Barrier Reef off the coast of NE Australia and track and Saffir-Simpson category for Tropical Cyclone Alfred in March 2025, note in the legend, TD= Tropical Depression and TS= Tropical Storm (Source IBTrACS (Knapp et al. 2010)); (B) LiDAR Digital Elevation Model (Vertical datum is mean sea level, MSL) with 25 cm resolution of One Tree Reef (OTR) measured in 2018 (Harris et al. 2023) showing the location of the Spotter wave buoy; (C) Wave power from the southern One Tree Island Research Station (OTIRS) wave buoy on the east flank of One Tree Reef (see B for location) during TC Alfred.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Orthomosaics of One Tree Island with adjacent rubble reef flat in November 2022 (A) and post TC Alfred in March 2025 (B); the grooves off the SE of One Tree Reef are clear of sediment in November 2024 (photo by Lachlan Perris, C) and infilled with coral rubble fans spilling sediment as SAG Fans onto the reef flat post TC Alfred in March 2025 (photo by One Tree Island Research Station, OTIRS, D); Orthomosaic of the SAG at One Tree Reef post TC Alfred (March 2025), showing the sediment fans delivered through the groove channels, and the locations of T1 and T2, the SAG bathymetry corresponds to data obtained with LiDAR in 2018(E); T1 shows a cross-section of the edges of the rubble fans extracted from the drone data (F); and, T2 demonstrates infilling of the grooves by comparing a LiDAR bathymetry from 2018 with a single beam bathymetry (T2) measured in 2025 post TC Alfred (G).

Author comment: Grooves in forereefs act as transport channels to deliver coral rubble during tropical cyclones — R0/PR1

Comments

Dear Professor Tom Spencer,

I am pleased to submit our manuscript, titled “Grooves in forereefs act as transport channels to deliver coral rubble during tropical cyclones”, for consideration as a Rapid Communication in Coastal Futures.

This study documents a rare and consequential sediment transport event following a sequence of climate-related disturbances on the Great Barrier Reef. In the early months (Austral summer) of 2024, the reef experienced the 9th global bleaching event, with catastrophic impacts at One Tree Reef, a site of longstanding significance in Geoscience. One year later, in March 2025, Tropical Cyclone Alfred remobilised the resulting rubble and transported it onto the reef flat.

While grooves (the channels of Spur and Groove systems) have long been suspected to play a role in sediment dynamics, the prevailing view has been that it is “impossible” for rubble to move upslope through them to the reef flat. Our manuscript shows the first evidence that large volumes of coral rubble are delivered to the reef flat through these grooves. We present qualitative and quantitative drone surveys and field measurements of topography and bathymetry to document this process.

These findings challenge long-standing assumptions about sediment delivery mechanisms on coral reefs. They carry immediate implications for coral island sediment budgets, interpretations of past reef-building processes, and forecasts of reef and island evolution under climate change. These insights are specially timely given their relevance to increasingly used restoration strategies (e.g., rubble stabilization) and to global sustainability efforts, particularly United Nations Sustainable Development Goals related to Small Island Developing States (SIDS) such as SDG13 (Climate action), SDG14 (Life below water), and SDG 11 (Sustainable cities and communities). These insights are especially timely given the relevance to millions of people globally whose livelihoods and sovereign marine resources are inextricably linked to coral island stability.

This Rapid Communication is well suited to Coastal Futures and will be of broad interest, to researchers studying climate impacts, island dynamics, and Earth system evolution. We did not submit to the special collection on Extreme Events at the Coast because the deadline was two months ago and in their advertisement, they did not mention Rapid Communication as one of the accepted article types. We would be happy to contribute to that collection if the editorial team think it is appropriate, and we are still on time.

Thank you for considering our submission. We believe it will make a timely and significant contribution to the journal’s readership.

Review: Grooves in forereefs act as transport channels to deliver coral rubble during tropical cyclones — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

This is an extremely interesting and novel piece of work that should be published. It details for the first time field evidence of the role of spurs and grooves in delivering sediment to the reef flats during cyclones. This finding has implications for understanding the processes of sediment delivery to reef flats and ultimately eventually to islands. Some minor suggested amendments are provided below.

Suggest to reference Tuck et al. 2019 in reference to physical models – line 59. (Megan E. Tuck, Paul S. Kench, Murray R. Ford, Gerd Masselink; Physical modelling of the response of reef islands to sea-level rise. Geology 2019;; 47 (9): 803–806. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/G46362.1)

Line 62 – suggest change ‘forereefs’ to ‘reefs’ or ‘forereefs and reef flats’ as it is not just the forereefs that produce sediment.

Line 63 – be specific about climate change disruptions – increased sea surface temps, and maybe increased intensity of tropical cyclones?

Line 86 – are these circulation cells located in grooves?

Line 95 – please indicate where this study was undertaken

Line 98 – do you mean Kan? Or the authors of this current manuscript – please clarify who these authors are

Line 111/112 – is the presence of large rubble clasts covering the bottom of the grooves? Does it build up in these grooves for example? Or is it a fine veneer?

Figure 1 – Very nice figure, but its not clear what TD and TS stand for (depression and storm?). Please include in the caption, and also add (OTR) to the caption after One Tree Reef (change from Island to match figure)

Line 126 – add month of bleaching

Line 161 – ‘reef building is more than coral growth’ – this needs further explanation. I think you need to explain the role that rubble plays in reef building as well

Figure 2 – Great pictures – but do you have an equivalent picture to D) that you could use for C) instead or as well? C shows the SAG clearly but does not show the landward section of reef so you cannot get an idea of how ‘new’ these rubble fans are (are they all rubble, or a mixture of sand too?) . The description of E) needs some additional information – this is a combo of LiDAR from 2018? Plus orthomosaic? Its not clear what data are from 2018 and what are from 2025?. In (G) suggest changing key to LiDAR bathy and drone bathy. It would be interesting to overlay the location of grooves upon E) to determine if the location of these fans are directly landward or slightly angled relative to the centre of the grooves (does one groove produce one fan, or multiple grooves?).

Review: Grooves in forereefs act as transport channels to deliver coral rubble during tropical cyclones — R0/PR3

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

This is an exceptionally valuable report on phenomena occurring at the reef edge of coral reefs during heavy swells, based on data and observations from the period around intense, infrequent tropical cyclones. Unlike sand cays, the seafloor where coral rubble accumulates and the islets composed of coral rubble are difficult to observe continuously as they change. Observations during major events like Tropical Cyclone Alfred provide a realistic and reliable opportunity to obtain evidence. The authors' initiative in successfully seizing this extremely valuable chance is commendable.

The text is concise yet contains important points and is commendable. However, Figure 2 contains many unclear points and should be improved.

Figure 2

1) Is it possible to describe where changes occurred by comparing (A) and (B)?

For example, the shape of the spite on the reef northeast of OTI has also changed (the elongated spite seaward has disappeared, and sedimentation is progressing near the island). The vegetated spite northwest has become narrower (has erosion progressed?).

2) Are (C) and (D) photographs from the same viewpoint? (C) appears to be a vertical photograph, while (D) seems to be an oblique photograph.

It is unclear what “the grooves off the SE of One Tree Reef” refers to; please indicate this with arrow(s) on the figure or add an explanatory note.

Please also add arrow(s) to photograph (D) for the description “infilled with coral rubble fans spilling sediment onto the reef flat”.

Regarding wave conditions at the reef edge during tropical cyclones, there is a paper by Watanabe et al. 2023.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115632

Note that the filling of grooves with coral gravel is also evident from observations of cross-sections of cutting through coral reefs (Kan et al. 1995, 1997). These papers are for your information. They can be viewed at the following sites.

Kan, H., Hori, N., Nakashima,Y. and Ichikawa,K. (1995) The evolution of narrow reef flats at high-latitude in the Ryukyu Islands. Coral Reefs, Vol.14, p.123-130.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00367229

Kan,H., Hori,N., Kawana,T., Kaigara,T. and Ichikawa,K. (1997) The evolution of a Holocene fringing reef and island: reefal environmental sequence and sea level change in Tonaki Island, the central Ryukyus. Atoll Research Bulletin, No.443, p.1-20.

https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/84708123/Kan_et_al_1997_Atoll_Res_Bull_Smithsonian_-libre.pdf?1650678660=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DThe_evolution_of_a_Holocene_fringing_ree.pdf&Expires=1758677739&Signature=Uvej7851~vkFT59z~0CisQaRbadJd0~8n1IG7jTapPqo1udvy6G-eU0LuYXVGL0xnUMvypX6FUluUOCLAcYhLD7DFsCVw~DLdMKfG1PHKKKvUyNE-Oc7JcKifog2bpHUC04TwUWv0mBEfds3lXaBIUaWrNmjExCU0CkGof~UEjKqbZH4TVQXfQV~WHk94S0D~dfn90clRP9-M3-Gm4HAUXap8-XGRM-rnNV92VCStnEZQYfEj5fwgtik2NMtbu1cJ19iFCGjszHN-xHueRjrpGXdy5-2NndYParJJ~RsFTUyDLfUT6Kf5x9uJujJ-v8oavg7SBHp2AEr4QBBcmJ4zQ__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA

Since I can’t seem to attach the file, I’ll provide the website instead.

Recommendation: Grooves in forereefs act as transport channels to deliver coral rubble during tropical cyclones — R0/PR4

Comments

The two reviewers provide very positive examinations of your manuscript. I agree that this work should be published with some minor / moderate revisions. These all seem relatively straightforward and think this team of authors will have no problem making the necessary revisions.

I do have some queries and confusion about the way this research is framed. It seems as though spur and groove outer reef morphologies are being described as an avenue for sediment transport for building reef islands. My understanding of reef islands comes from the GBR / Seychelles / Malaysia and for those sites, reef islands tend to build up on the leeward, rather than the windward, side of a reef platform. There are no SaGs on the leeward side of these platforms.

The study site of this paper, One Tree Island, is a shingle (rather than sand), island and a rather anomalous case for the Capricorn Bunker Group, and indeed the wider GBR as the island has formed on the windward side of the reef. To make a direct linkage between the SnG sediment stores and islands, and to claim that this work has significance for low lying island communities elsewhere seems a stretch.

The authors should either reframe, or explicitly name some reef islands (i.e. sand cays of the sort that may be populated in the Pacific, where islanders are seeing the impacts of sea-level rise) that have actually formed or been nourished through sediment transport adjacent to spur and grooves. There has been a tendency in recent years to identify sediment in any part of the reef system as an immediate saviour of reef islands. Most have no credible foundation.

Funafuti could be an example where windward islands have formed through coral rubble accumulation. The reef flats are narrow (<100m). While there is little doubt the coral rubble must have been derived from the forereef (which does have SnG), the mechanisms could be storm removal of coral and gravel along the entire forereef as opposed to SnG being the conveyor.

A broader question is why they make this link? The work is significant without leveraging off the discussion around island susceptibility to change, and is this necessary? Perhaps the article could be framed around the storage and potential flux of gravel to reef flats more generally?

Finally, in the acknowledgements section you acknowledge the first nations TOs for OTI, can you name and/ or list the groups?

Decision: Grooves in forereefs act as transport channels to deliver coral rubble during tropical cyclones — R0/PR5

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Grooves in forereefs act as transport channels to deliver coral rubble during tropical cyclones — R1/PR6

Comments

Dear Professor Tom Spencer and A/Prof Sarah Hamylton,

Thank you very much for your considering our manuscript for publication, and apologies for our delay in resubmitting. I have just returned from three weeks in the field.

We have addressed all the comments and suggestions from the Handling Editor and the two anonymous reviewers and believe the paper has improved. We are submitting a version with tracked changes, a rebuttal table and a clean version of the paper.

Thank you for considering our submission. We believe it will make a timely and significant contribution to the journal’s readership.

Sincerely,

Professor Ana Vila-Concejo on behalf of all co-authors

Recommendation: Grooves in forereefs act as transport channels to deliver coral rubble during tropical cyclones — R1/PR7

Comments

This manuscript has been much improved by the revisions - I am happy to accept without it going out to a further review, subject to a few minor amendments, as outlined in the attached version.

Well done to this research team for this valuable paper!

Decision: Grooves in forereefs act as transport channels to deliver coral rubble during tropical cyclones — R1/PR8

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Grooves in forereefs act as transport channels to deliver coral rubble during tropical cyclones — R2/PR9

Comments

Please find our new resubmission- we have addressed the Associate Editor’s comments and hope that the manuscript is now ready for publication. We thank the Associate Editor and the Editor in Chief and also the anonymous reviewers for helping us improve the manuscript.

Best wishes,

Ana

Recommendation: Grooves in forereefs act as transport channels to deliver coral rubble during tropical cyclones — R2/PR10

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Grooves in forereefs act as transport channels to deliver coral rubble during tropical cyclones — R2/PR11

Comments

No accompanying comment.