Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T05:23:59.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hegel's Hyperbolic Formalism1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2013

Rocío Zambrana
Rocío Zambrana*
Affiliation:
The New School for Social Research, zambrana.rocio@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

The Science of Logic is perhaps Hegel's most notoriously impenetrable work. Despite well over a century of commentaries as well as the recent proliferation of scholarship, there exists little agreement concerning the text, whether with regard to particular details or the project of speculative logic in general. Nonetheless, the Logic has often been regarded as exemplifying totalizing metaphysics at its worst. Contemporary philosophers concerned with overcoming metaphysics have thus sought to show not only the incoherence of speculative logic but also the perils of Hegel's supposedly totalizing philosophy.

In contrast, showing the continuity between Kant and Hegel has been the strategy for establishing a ‘non-metaphysical’ view of Hegel's speculative logic. Against readings of Hegel as a metaphysical monist who defends the reality of the Absolute Idea developing in nature and spirit, speculative logic is presented as the absolute-idealist successor to Kantian transcendental logic. Hegel's speculative logic is an ‘idealist logic’, since it aims at expounding the conditions necessary for the determinacy of any possible object of thought. Speculative logic thus clarities that experience is dependent on non-empirical concepts and, ultimately, on selfconsciousness. Along this interpretative line, Hegel's Science of Logic offers an account of thinking as a norm-based activity, and of concepts as rules for fixing determinacy. The great insight of Hegel's Logic is, on this view, twofold. First, Hegel's notion of the concept [der Begriff] is understood as a holistic-inferential system of logical concepts, since it provides an account of conceptual content as determined by every other possible content. Second, Hegel's analysis of the actualization of the concept — of the concept that has ‘made itself the foundation’, in Hegel's obscure phrasing — provides an account of the fundamental role of authority involved in the process of fixing determinacy. To be bound to a rule is to acknowledge it as having authority over us and at the same time to institute it as authoritative over the states of affairs that we seek to determine. That Hegel spoke of the freedom of the concept is, therefore, crucial. It suggests that determinacy is ultimately a matter of the authorization of reason, of establishing one way of fixing intelligibility over against others.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , Spring/Summer 2010 , pp. 107 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This paper was presented at a symposium on the closing argument of Hegel's Science of Logic hosted by the Society for Systematic Philosophy and held at the 2009 Meeting of the Eastern Division of the American Philosophical Association. I would like to thank Richard Dien Winfield for his kind invitation to participate in the symposium. I am deeply grateful to Jay Bernstein, Richard Bernstein, Karen Ng, Angelica Nuzzo, and Martin Hagglund for helpful comments on and incisive questions about this essay.

References

Brandom, R. (1991), Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays on the Metaphysics of Intentionality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. (2005), ‘Sketch of a Program for a Critical Reading of Hegel: Comparing Empirical and Logical Concepts’, Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealism us 3.Google Scholar
Burbidge, J. (1988), On Hegel's Logic: Fragments of a Commentary. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Burbidge, J. (2004), ‘Hegel's Logic’ in Woods, Gabbay and (eds.), The Rise of Modem Logic. From Leibniz to Frege, vol. 3 of The Handbook of the History of Logic. Maryland Heights: North Holland Press.Google Scholar
Burbidge, J. (2007), Hegel's Systematic Contingency. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230590366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (1982), Hegel's Dialectics: Five Hermeneutkal Studies, trans. Smith, P. Christopher. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, A. (2000), Hegel and the Problem of Multiplicity. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Hartmann, K. (1977), ‘Hegel: A Non-Metaphysical View’ in MacIntyre, Alasdair (ed.), Hegel: A Collection of Critical Essays. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Hägglund, M. (2010), ‘The Arche-Materiality of Time: Deconstruction, Evolution, and Speculative Materialism,’ in Attridge, Derek and Elliott, Jane, ed. Theory after ‘Theory’. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1969a), Wissenschaft der Logik, vols. 5 and 6 of Werke in zwanzig Bänden, ed. Moldenhauer, E. and Michel, K. M.. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1969b), Science of Logic, trans. Miller, A. V.. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1969c), Phänomenologie des Geistes, vol. 3 of Werke in zwanzig Bänden, ed. Moldenhauer, E. and Michel, K. M.. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. (1970), Philosophy of Nature: Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences (1830), Part II Hegel's Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences. Trans. Miller, A.V.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977), Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. Miller, A. V.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, D. (1967), Hegelim Kontext. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. (2005), Introduction to Hegel: Freedom, Truth, and History, 2nd ed. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. (2006), The Opening of Hegel's Logic. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Inwood, M. (1992), A Hegel Dictionary. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1965), Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Smith, Norman Kemp. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Lau, C.-F. (2006), ‘Language and Metaphysics: The Dialectics of Hegel's Speculative Proposition’ in Surber, Jere (ed.), Hegel and Language. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, B. (2007), Hegel's Critique of Metaphysics, trans. Simek, Nicole J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511487262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K. (1976), Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, trans. Mandel, Ernest, vol. 1. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
McCumber, J. (1993), The Company of Words: Hegel, Language and Systematic Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Michelet, K.L. (1876), Das System der Philosophic als exacter Wissenschaft. Berlin: Nicolaischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Nuzzo, A. (1999), ‘The Idea of “Method” in Hegel's Science of Logic—a Method or Finite Thinking and Absolute Reason’, Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 39–40.Google Scholar
Nuzzo, A. (2005), ‘The End of Hegel's Logic. Absolute Idea as Absolute Method’ in Carlson, David Gray (ed.), Hegel's Theory of the Subject. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nuzzo, A. (2006), ‘The Language of Hegel's Speculative Philosophy’ in Surber, Jere (ed.), Hegel and Language. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Nuzzo, A. (2007), ‘Dialectical Reason and Necessary Conflict: Understanding and the Nature of Terror’, Cosmos and History 3: 2–3.Google Scholar
Pinkard, T. (1979), “Hegel's Idealism and Hegel's Logic”, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 33: 2.Google Scholar
Pinkard, T. (1988), Hegel's Dialectics: The Explanation of Possibility. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Pinkard, T. (1996), Hegel's Phenomenology: The Sociality of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pinkard, T. (2002), German Philosophy 1760–1860: The Legacy of Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, R. (1989), Hegel's Idealism: The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, R. (2005), ‘Brandom's Hegel’, European Journal of Philosophy 13: 3.10.1111/j.1468-0378.2005.00235.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, R. (2008), Hegel's Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511808005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proops, I. (2005), ‘Kant's Conception of Analytic Judgment’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 20: 3.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (2002), The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Redding, P. (1996), Hegel's Hermeneutics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501737596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, P. (2007), Analytic Philosophy and the Return to Hegelian Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511487620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinaldi, G. (1992), A History of Interpretation of the Logic of Hegel. Lewiston: The Edwin Mellon Press.Google Scholar
Rockmore, T. (2005), Hegel, Idealism, and Analytic Philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, G. (1981), Hegel Contra Sociology. New Jersey: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Sallis, J. (1997), ‘Hegel's Concept of Presentation: Its Determination in the Preface to the Phenomenology of Spirit’, in Stewart, John (ed.), The Phenomenology of Spirit' Reader. Critical and Interpretive Essays. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Stern, R. (1990), Hegel, Kant and the Structure of the Object. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Surber, J. (1975), ‘Hegel's Speculative Sentence’, Hegel-Studien 10.Google Scholar
Tugenhadt, E. ( 1976), ‘Das Sein und Das Nichts,’ in Klostermann, Vittorio, ed. Durchblicke: Martin Heidegger zum 80 Geburstag. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Rohs, Peter. 1974. ‘Das Problem der vermittelten Unmittelbarkeit in der Hegelschen Logik,’ Philosophisches Jahrbuch 81.Google Scholar
Rosen, M. (1982), Hegel's Dialectics and Its Criticisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511624841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, R.M. (2005), Hegel's Philosophy of Reality, Freedom, and God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winfield, R. D. (2006), From Concept to Objectivity: Thinking Through Hegel's Subjective Logic. London: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Winfield, R. D. (2009), ‘The End of Logic’, paper presented at the Society for Systematic Philosophy, held at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Division of the American Philosophical Association.Google Scholar